scholarly journals Ediacaran survivors

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Simon Conway Morris

Ediacaran taxa are a characteristic element of latest Precambrian biotas, with an effectively global distribution. Their time range is not well understood, but with one possible exception from western Canada Ediacaran faunas appear always to post-date the late Precambrian glaciations. There is also growing evidence that many Ediacaran taxa disappeared before the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. These disappearances traditionally have been ascribed to changes in taphonomic circumstances, but a series of extinctions is a plausible alternative. Ediacaran fossils pose two major problems: Notwithstanding the reasons for their disappearance shortly before the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary, was their demise total or did some forms persist into the Cambrian? Second, is the traditional view that Ediacaran taxa are metazoans, many of a cnidarian grade, correct? Recently Seilacher, Bergström and others have argued that the Ediacaran organisms have a distinctive bauplan, difficult to reconcile with known phyla and possibly different from any metazoan.In the Cambrian, Burgess Shale-type faunas are the principal source of information on soft-bodied metazoans. The differences between them and Ediacaran assemblages are largely self-evident, but there is now unequivocal evidence for at least one Ediacaran survivor from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. This is a sea-pen-like animal, known from three specimens (one adult about 20 cm in length, and two juveniles). The fossils consist of a broad frond, with branches arising from a central axis on one side, while the opposite side is smooth apart from longitudinal ridges. The frond extends into a blunt holdfast that presumably was embedded in the muddy silt of the sea floor. This fossil is strikingly similar to the Ediacaran taxon Charniodiscus, best known from South Australia. The Burgess Shale example shows two important features. The first are pustule-like structures, possibly zooids, both on the branches and adjacent to the axis. The second feature is evidence for connections between the branches and axis, possibly representing canals. These features both support a comparison with extant pennatulaceans, and suggest that at least some Ediacaran taxa are correctly assigned to the metazoans.Also occurring in the Burgess Shale is an enigmatic bag-like organism Mackenzia costalis. Clear evidence exists for it being benthic, but its mode of feeding is uncertain. The interior appears to have consisted largely of a spacious cavity, probably sub-divided by longitudinal partitions. In addition, an elongate strand may represent a discrete organ, perhaps connected with digestion or reproduction. No exact equivalent to Mackenzia appears to occur in Ediacaran assemblages, but bag-like taxa are a common component. These include erniettids, best known from Namibia, and Platypholina, from the White Sea region of Russia.

The geological setting, biotic diversity and taphonomy of Cambrian soft-bodied Lagerstätten are reviewed with special reference to the Lower Cambrian Emu Bay Shale (South Australia) and Kinzers Formation (Pennsylvania), and the Middle Cambrian Stephen Formation (Burgess Shale and adjacent localities, British Columbia). Brief mention is made also of a number of more minor occurrences in the U.S.A., China and Spain. Exceptional preservation in the Upper Cambrian is discussed by K. J. Müller (this symposium). These soft-bodied Lagerstätten afford a series of special insights into the nature of Cambrian life. Emphasis is laid on the information they provide with regards (i) levels of diversity and the proportion of skeletized taxa; (ii) the origin and relative success of bodyplans; (iii) community ecology and evolution.


1992 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 48-50
Author(s):  
J.S Peel ◽  
S.C Morris ◽  
J.R Ineson

The German mining term lagerstatten, referring to a rock of any composition containing constituents of economic interest, has been widely applied to occurrences of abundant or unusually well preserved fossils (cf. Seilacher et al., 1985). The Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of western Canada is perhaps the most famous of all fossil-lagerstatt, with many of the approximately 140 known species preserving exquisite details of the soft anatomy of members of a community of organisms that was fossilised more than 500 million years ago (Whittington, 1985: Conway Morris, 1979, 1986; Gould, 1989). Other well known examples include the Upper Cambrian 'Orsten' of southern Sweden, the Lower Devonian Hunsruck Slate and the Jurassic Solnhofen Limestone of Germany (Stürmer et al.. 1980; Muller, 1985; Barthel et al. 1990; summary in Briggs & Crowther, 1990, pp. 266–297). The term can be applied aptly to the Sirius Passet fauna of central North Greenland, where a wealth of exceptionally preserved fossils (e.g. Fig. 1) from tile Lower Cambrian Buen Formation has been recorded from a small locality in western Peary Land, near the south-western end of the broad valley known as Sirius Passet (Fig. 2). The locality yielding the Sirius


1995 ◽  
Vol 347 (1321) ◽  
pp. 305-358 ◽  

Articulated halkieriids of Halkieria evangelista sp. nov. are described from the Sirius Passet fauna in the Lower Cambrian Buen Formation of Peary Land, North Greenland. Three zones of sclerites are recognizable: obliquely inclined rows of dorsal palmates, quincuncially inserted lateral cultrates and imbricated bundles of ventro-lateral siculates. In addition there is a prominent shell at both ends, each with radial ornamentation. Both sclerites and shells were probably calcareous, but increase in body size led to insertion of additional sclerites but marginal accretion of the shells. The ventral sole was soft and, in life, presumably muscular. Recognizable features of internal anatomy include a gut trace and possible musculature, inferred from imprints on the interior of the anterior shell. Halkieriids are closely related to the Middle Cambrian Wixaxia , best known from the Burgess Shale: this clade appears to have played an important role in early protostome evolution. From an animal fairly closely related to Wixaxia arose the polychaete annelids; the bundles of siculate sclerites prefigure the neurochaetae whereas the dorsal notochaetae derive from the palmates. Wixaxia appears to have a relic shell and a similar structure in the sternaspid polychaetes may be an evolutionary remnant. The primitive state in extant polychaetes is best expressed in groups such as chrysopetalids, aphroditaceans and amphinomids. The homology between polychaete chaetae and the mantle setae of brachiopods is one line of evidence to suggest that the latter phylum arose from a juvenile halkieriid in which the posterior shell was first in juxtaposition to the anterior and rotated beneath it to provide the bivalved condition of an ancestral brachiopod. H. evangelista sp. nov. has shells which resemble those of a brachiopod; in particular the posterior one. From predecessors of the halkieriids known as siphogonuchitids it is possible that both chitons (polyplacophorans) and conchiferan molluscs arose. The hypothesis of halkieriids and their relatives having a key role in annelid—brachiopod—mollusc evolution is in accord with some earlier proposals and recent evidence from molecular biology. It casts doubt, however, on a number of favoured concepts including the primitive annelid being oligochaetoid and a burrower, the brachiopods being deuterostomes and the coelom being an archaic feature of metazoans. Rather, the annelid coelom arose as a functional consequence of the transition from a creeping halkieriid to a polychaete with stepping parapodial locomotion.


1909 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-281
Author(s):  
Vincent A. Smith

I now proceed to discuss in detail the ascertained facts of each reign, inscriptions, of course, being the principal source of information, and in doing so shall permit myself a certain amount of latitude in digressions upon cognate topics. The inscriptions of the greatest value for establishing the genealogy of the royal family are Nos. 3, 8, and 19–22 of my List.


2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1138-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Bernard Caron ◽  
David M. Rudkin ◽  
Stuart Milliken

The discovery of a new naraoiid nektaspid in the Upper Silurian (Pridolian) of southeastern Ontario significantly extends the range of this unusual group. Nektaspids are nonmineralized arthropods typical of Early and Middle Cambrian soft-bottom communities, but were thought to have become extinct in the Late Ordovician. The unique holotype specimen of Naraoia bertiensis n. sp. comes from a Konservat–Lagerstätte deposit renowned for its eurypterid fauna (the Williamsville Member of the Bertie Formation). Naraoia bertiensis lacks thoracic segments and is morphologically similar to Naraoia compacta from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, save for the presence of a long ventral cephalic doublure and a subtly pointed posterior shield. To examine the phylogenetic relationships of the new naraoiid, we coded characters of the holotype specimen and of nine previously described nektaspids. The results confirm a sister taxon relationship between Naraoia compacta and Naraoia bertiensis and the monophyly of nektaspid forms lacking thoracic segments (family Naraoiidae). This latter group may have arisen from an ancestral segment-bearing form through heterochronic loss of thoracic segments early in the Cambrian. The disjunct occurrence of a naraoiid nektaspid in the Late Silurian resembles the reappearance of other “Lazarus taxa” that were thought to have been eliminated during mass extinction events. The naraoiid lineage survived the Late Ordovician biotic crisis, but in this case the “Lazarus effect” seems likely to be taphonomic in origin.


1996 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond Collins

The remarkable “evolution” of the reconstructions of Anomalocaris, the extraordinary predator from the 515 million year old Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia, reflects the dramatic changes in our interpretation of early animal life on Earth over the past 100 years. Beginning in 1892 with a claw identified as the abdomen and tail of a phyllocarid crustacean, parts of Anomalocaris have been described variously as a jellyfish, a sea-cucumber, a polychaete worm, a composite of a jellyfish and sponge, or have been attached to other arthropods as appendages. Charles D. Walcott collected complete specimens of Anomalocaris nathorsti between 1911 and 1917, and a Geological Survey of Canada party collected an almost complete specimen of Anomalocaris canadensis in 1966 or 1967, but neither species was adequately described until 1985. At that time they were interpreted by Whittington and Briggs to be representatives of “a hitherto unknown phylum.”Here, using recently collected specimens, the two species are newly reconstructed and described in the genera Anomalocaris and Laggania, and interpreted to be members of an extinct arthropod class, Dinocarida, and order Radiodonta, new to science. The long history of inaccurate reconstruction and mistaken identification of Anomalocaris and Laggania exemplifies our great difficulty in visualizing and classifying, from fossil remains, the many Cambrian animals with no apparent living descendants.


2016 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID A. LEGG ◽  
STEVE PATES

AbstractUtahcaris orion Conway Morris & Robison, 1988, from the lower middle Cambrian (Series 3, Stage 5) Spence Shale Member situated in Utah, USA, is redescribed based on a restudy of the original material. Newly recognized features, including ventral lateral eyes, trunk appendages, and a bulbous cephalic shield with subtriangular extension, reinforce similarities with Sanctacaris uncata from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Both are assigned to the new family, Sanctacarididae. Sanctacaridids represent the oldest chelicerates. Their ecology and that of their nearest non-chelicerate relatives indicate that Chelicerata were plesiomorphically predatory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document