Carbohydrate Force Fields: The Role of Small Partial Atomic Charges in Preventing Conformational Collapse

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan D. Lazar ◽  
Farideh B. Akher ◽  
Neil Ravenscroft ◽  
Michelle M. Kuttel
Keyword(s):  
Force Fields ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Partial Atomic Charges

Benchmarking Electronic Structure Methods for Accurate Fixed-Charge Electrostatic Models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Zhou ◽  
Michael Schauperl ◽  
Paul Nerenberg
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Structure ◽  
Gas Phase ◽  
Condensed Phase ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Dipole Moments ◽  
Fixed Charge ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Molecular Dipole ◽  
Partial Atomic Charges

<p>The accuracy of classical molecular mechanics (MM) force fields used for condensed phase molecular simulations depends strongly on the accuracy of modeling nonbonded interactions between atoms, such as electrostatic interactions. Some popular fixed-charge MM force fields use partial atomic charges derived from gas phase electronic structure calculations using the Hartree-Fock method with the relatively small 6-31G* basis set (HF/6-31G*). It is generally believed that HF/6-31G* generates fortuitously overpolarized electron distributions, as would be expected in the higher dielectric environment of the condensed phase. Using a benchmark set of 47 molecules we show that HF/6-31G* overpolarizes molecules by just under 10% on average with respect to experimental gas phase dipole moments. The overpolarization of this method/basis set combination varies significantly though and, in some cases, even leads to molecular dipole moments that are lower than experimental gas phase measurements. We further demonstrate that using computationally inexpensive density functional theory (DFT) methods, together with appropriate augmented basis sets and a continuum solvent model, can yield molecular dipole moments that are both more strongly and more uniformly overpolarized. These data suggest that these methods – or ones similar to them – should be adopted for the derivation of accurate partial atomic charges for next-generation MM force fields.<br></p>

Benchmarking Electronic Structure Methods for Accurate Fixed-Charge Electrostatic Models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Zhou ◽  
Michael Schauperl ◽  
Paul Nerenberg
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Structure ◽  
Gas Phase ◽  
Condensed Phase ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Dipole Moments ◽  
Fixed Charge ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Molecular Dipole ◽  
Partial Atomic Charges

<p>The accuracy of classical molecular mechanics (MM) force fields used for condensed phase molecular simulations depends strongly on the accuracy of modeling nonbonded interactions between atoms, such as electrostatic interactions. Some popular fixed-charge MM force fields use partial atomic charges derived from gas phase electronic structure calculations using the Hartree-Fock method with the relatively small 6-31G* basis set (HF/6-31G*). It is generally believed that HF/6-31G* generates fortuitously overpolarized electron distributions, as would be expected in the higher dielectric environment of the condensed phase. Using a benchmark set of 47 molecules we show that HF/6-31G* overpolarizes molecules by just under 10% on average with respect to experimental gas phase dipole moments. The overpolarization of this method/basis set combination varies significantly though and, in some cases, even leads to molecular dipole moments that are lower than experimental gas phase measurements. We further demonstrate that using computationally inexpensive density functional theory (DFT) methods, together with appropriate augmented basis sets and a continuum solvent model, can yield molecular dipole moments that are both more strongly and more uniformly overpolarized. These data suggest that these methods – or ones similar to them – should be adopted for the derivation of accurate partial atomic charges for next-generation MM force fields.<br></p>

Benchmarking Electronic Structure Methods for Accurate Fixed-Charge Electrostatic Models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Zhou ◽  
Michael Schauperl ◽  
Paul Nerenberg
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Structure ◽  
Gas Phase ◽  
Condensed Phase ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Dipole Moments ◽  
Fixed Charge ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Molecular Dipole ◽  
Partial Atomic Charges

<div><div><div><p>The accuracy of classical molecular mechanics (MM) force fields used for condensed phase molecular simulations depends strongly on the accuracy of modeling nonbonded interactions between atoms, such as electrostatic interactions. Some popular fixed-charge MM force fields use partial atomic charges derived from gas phase electronic structure calculations using the Hartree-Fock method with the relatively small 6-31G* basis set (HF/6-31G*). It is generally believed that HF/6-31G* generates fortuitously overpolarized electron distributions, as would be expected in the higher dielectric environment of the condensed phase. Using a benchmark set of 47 molecules, we show that HF/6-31G* does not uniformly overpolarize molecules and in some cases even leads to molecular dipole moments that are lower than experimental gas phase measurements. We further demonstrate that using computationally inexpensive density functional theory (DFT) methods, together with appropriate augmented basis sets and a continuum solvent model, can yield molecular dipole moments that are both more strongly and more uniformly overpolarized. These data suggest that these methods – or ones similar to them – should be adopted for the derivation of accurate partial atomic charges for next-generation MM force fields.</p></div></div></div>

Hydration Free Energies of Organic Molecules in the FreeSolv Database Calculated with Polarized Atom In Molecules Atomic Charges and the GAFF Force Field.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Riquelme ◽  
Alejandro Lara ◽  
David L. Mobley ◽  
Toon Vestraelen ◽  
Adelio R Matamala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Force Field ◽  
Functional Groups ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Chemical Elements ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Molecular Systems ◽  
Solvent Model

<div>Computer simulations of bio-molecular systems often use force fields, which are combinations of simple empirical atom-based functions to describe the molecular interactions. Even though polarizable force fields give a more detailed description of intermolecular interactions, nonpolarizable force fields, developed several decades ago, are often still preferred because of their reduced computation cost. Electrostatic interactions play a major role in bio-molecular systems and are therein described by atomic point charges.</div><div>In this work, we address the performance of different atomic charges to reproduce experimental hydration free energies in the FreeSolv database in combination with the GAFF force field. Atomic charges were calculated by two atoms-in-molecules approaches, Hirshfeld-I and Minimal Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS). To account for polarization effects, the charges were derived from the solute's electron density computed with an implicit solvent model and the energy required to polarize the solute was added to the free energy cycle. The calculated hydration free energies were analyzed with an error model, revealing systematic errors associated with specific functional groups or chemical elements. The best agreement with the experimental data is observed for the MBIS atomic charge method, including the solvent polarization, with a root mean square error of 2.0 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for the 613 organic molecules studied. The largest deviation was observed for phosphor-containing molecules and the molecules with amide, ester and amine functional groups.</div>

Using Atomic Charges to Model Molecular Polarization.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Force Fields ◽  
Atomic Charge ◽  
Electric Polarization ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Electrical Polarization

We review different models for introducing electrical polarization in force fields, with special focus on methods where polarization is modelled at the atomic charge level. While electric polarization has been...

scholarly journals Predicting partial atomic charges in siliceous zeolites

2019 ◽  
Vol 277 ◽  
pp. 184-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarod J. Wolffis ◽  
Danny E.P. Vanpoucke ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Keith V. Lawler ◽  
Paul M. Forster
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Partial Atomic Charges

scholarly journals Determining Partial Atomic Charges for Liquid Water: Assessing Electronic Structure and Charge Models

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bowen Han ◽  
Christine Isborn ◽  
Liang Shi
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Structure ◽  
Dipole Moment ◽  
Charge Transfer ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Quantum Chemical ◽  
Water Dimer ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Molecular Dipole ◽  
Molecular Dipole Moment ◽  
Partial Atomic Charges

Partial atomic charges provide an intuitive and efficient way to describe the charge distribution and the resulting intermolecular electrostatic interactions in liquid water. Many charge models exist and it is unclear which model provides the best assignment of partial atomic charges in response to the local molecular environment. In this work, we systematically scrutinize various electronic structure methods and charge models (Mulliken, Natural Population Analysis, CHelpG, RESP, Hirshfeld, Iterative Hirshfeld, and Bader) by evaluating their performance in predicting the dipole moments of isolated water, water clusters, and liquid water as well as charge transfer in the water dimer and liquid water. Although none of the seven charge models is capable of fully capturing the dipole moment increase from isolated water (1.85 D) to liquid water (about 2.9 D), the Iterative Hirshfeld method performs best for liquid water, reproducing its experimental average molecular dipole moment, yielding a reasonable amount of intermolecular charge transfer, and showing modest sensitivity to the local water environment. The performance of the charge model is dependent on the choice of the density functional and the quantum treatment of the environment. The computed molecular dipole moment of water generally increases with the percentage of the exact Hartree-Fock exchange in the functional, whereas the amount of charge transfer between molecules decreases. For liquid water, including two full solvation shells of surrounding water molecules (within about 5.5 A of the central water) in the quantum-chemical calculation converges the charges of the central water molecule. Our final pragmatic quantum-chemical charge assigning protocol for liquid water is the Iterative Hirshfeld method with M06-HF/aug-cc-pVDZ and a quantum region cutoff radius of 5.5 A.<br>

The role of nuclear charges in unifying the descriptions of neural networks (NN)-based force fields

2020 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 128262
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Chu ◽  
Yiming Zhang ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Qing Huang ◽  
Xiaogang Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Force Fields
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document