Mapping the Bimolecular Interface of the Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)−PTH1 Receptor Complex:  Spatial Proximity between Lys27(of the Hormone Principal Binding Domain) and Leu261(of the First Extracellular Loop) of the Human PTH1 Receptor†

Biochemistry ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (28) ◽  
pp. 8142-8152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvi Greenberg ◽  
Alessandro Bisello ◽  
Dale F. Mierke ◽  
Michael Rosenblatt ◽  
Michael Chorev
2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (43) ◽  
pp. 32485-32495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Dean ◽  
Ashok Khatri ◽  
Zhanna Potetinova ◽  
Gordon E. Willick ◽  
Thomas J. Gardella

The principal receptor-binding domain (Ser17–Val31) of parathyroid hormone (PTH) is predicted to form an amphiphilic α-helix and to interact primarily with the N-terminal extracellular domain (N domain) of the PTH receptor (PTHR). We explored these hypotheses by introducing a variety of substitutions in region 17–31 of PTH-(1–31) and assessing, via competition assays, their effects on binding to the wild-type PTHR and to PTHR-delNt, which lacks most of the N domain. Substitutions at Arg20 reduced affinity for the intact PTHR by 200-fold or more, but altered affinity for PTHR-delNt by 4-fold or less. Similar effects were observed for Glu substitutions at Trp23, Leu24, and Leu28, which together form the hydrophobic face of the predicted amphiphilic α-helix. Glu substitutions at Arg25, Lys26, and Lys27 (which forms the hydrophilic face of the helix) caused 4–10-fold reductions in affinity for both receptors. Thus, the side chains of Arg20, together with those composing the hydrophobic face of the ligand's putative amphiphilic α-helix, contribute strongly to PTHR-binding affinity by interacting specifically with the N domain of the receptor. The side chains projecting from the opposite helical face contribute weakly to binding affinity by different mechanisms, possibly involving interactions with the extracellular loop/transmembrane domain region of the receptor. The data help define the roles that side chains in the binding domain of PTH play in the PTH-PTHR interaction process and provide new clues for understanding the overall topology of the bimolecular complex.


2012 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. E813-E821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjitha Katikaneni ◽  
Tulasi Ponnapakkam ◽  
Hirofumi Suda ◽  
Shigeru Miyata ◽  
Joshua Sakon ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 768-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Stratford ◽  
V.U. Christopher ◽  
Joshua Sakon ◽  
Ranjitha Katikaneni ◽  
Robert Gensure ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 721-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.F. Mierke ◽  
L. Mao ◽  
M. Pellegrini ◽  
A. Piserchio ◽  
J. Plati ◽  
...  

Over the years, the association of peptide ligands to Family B GPCRs (G-protein coupled receptors) has been characterized by a number of experimental and theoretical techniques. For the PTH (parathyroid hormone) ligand–receptor system, important insight has been provided by photoaffinity labelling experiments and the elucidation of direct contact points between ligand and receptor. Our research has focused on the structural elucidation of the receptor domains shown to be involved in the binding of PTH. Employing a combination of carefully designed receptor domains, solution-state NMR carried out in the presence of membrane mimetics and extensive computer simulations, we have obtained a well-resolved model of the ligand–receptor complex for PTH. Here, we review the development of this model and highlight some inherent limitations of the methods employed and their consequences on interpretation of the ligand–receptor model.


1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1269-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Lee ◽  
M D Luck ◽  
H Jüppner ◽  
J T Potts ◽  
H M Kronenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document