A guided design approach to teaching general chemistry

1980 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Hoggard
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Swinbank ◽  
Mary Whitehouse ◽  
Robin Millar

In this contribution we outline how the York Science project is using a ‘backward design’ approach to teaching science to students aged 11–14. We then present some examples of formative assessment tasks and show how simple selected-response questions can be modified to provide teachers with detailed information about students’ ideas. Finally we indicate how such tasks can help promote active learning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Aigerim Mukhambetova ◽  
Åsa Maria Camnert ◽  
Ariane Williams

Author(s):  
Medhat Moussa ◽  
William David Lubitz

This paper presents an approach to teaching engineering design that is based on involving instructors with students during the design process using structured meetings called Professor In The Loop (PITL) meetings. The main idea is to enhance the transfer of design skills from instructors to students by providing instructors with a window for observing students working on their design. The instructors are able to provide the students with immediate feedback about their design approach and skills on an ongoing basis throughout the project. PITL meetings have been tested in a third year engineering design course taken by all students enrolled in engineering programs at the University of Guelph. Information is given on how a meeting is conducted, how it is evaluated, and the types and nature of instructor feedback. The effectiveness of these meetings is validated using data from focussed end-of-term surveys.


Author(s):  
Aishling Flaherty ◽  
Anne O’Dwyer ◽  
JJ Leahy ◽  
Oliver Richardson

Teaching introductory modules and classes of undergraduate programmes can present a number of subjective and objective challenges. Objective challenges include a high degree of variation in students’ prior learning experiences combined with a high student-teacher ratio. Subjective challenges include the transitional changes which first year students undergo that include cognitive, affective and physiological changes as they make the leap from the often small and secluded secondary-level environment to the all-consuming tertiary-level environment. For introductory chemistry modules, such as General Chemistry, the pertinence of these challenges can have negative repercussions on students’ acquirement of basic chemical concepts in first year which could inherently go on to hinder their successful progression through their third-level education. In an effort to tackle the challenges posed against effective learning in General Chemistry modules, this exploratory research study set out to understand how the potential incorporation of a new approach to teaching and learning would be received by the three main cohorts involved. The attitudes and recommendations of undergraduate students, post-graduate students who have a role as laboratory demonstrators and module leaders towards the potential incorporation of Student-Inquiry activities and laboratories into General Chemistry were investigated. All three cohorts welcomed the incorporation of Student-Inquiry as part of the approach to teaching and learning. While the researchers and module leaders had an initial awareness of the challenges that come with teaching General Chemistry, little was known of the potential significance of the opportunity which lay amongst these challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document