Integration of coal utilization and environmental control in integrated gasification combined cycle systems

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1982-1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Christopher Frey ◽  
Edward S. Rubin
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz Kotowicz ◽  
Anna Skorek-osikowska ◽  
Katarzyna Janusz-szymańska

Membrane separation of carbon dioxide in the integrated gasification combined cycle systemsIntegrated gasification combined cycle systems (IGCC) are becoming more popular because of the characteristics, by which they are characterized, including low pollutants emissions, relatively high efficiency of electricity production and the ability to integrate the installation of carbon capture and storage (CCS). Currently, the most frequently used CO2capture technology in IGCC systems is based on the absorption process. This method causes a significant increase of the internal load and decreases the efficiency of the entire system. It is therefore necessary to look for new methods of carbon dioxide capture. The authors of the present paper propose the use of membrane separation. The paper reviews available membranes for use in IGCC systems, indicates, inter alia, possible places of their implementation in the system and the required operation parameters. Attention is drawn to the most important parameters of membranes (among other selectivity and permeability) influencing the cost and performance of the whole installation. Numerical model of a membrane was used, among others, to analyze the influence of the basic parameters of the selected membranes on the purity and recovery ratio of the obtained permeate, as well as to determine the energetic cost of the use of membranes for the CO2separation in IGCC systems. The calculations were made within the environment of the commercial package Aspen Plus. For the calculations both, membranes selective for carbon dioxide and membranes selective for hydrogen were used. Properly selected pressure before and after membrane module allowed for minimization of energy input on CCS installation assuring high purity and recovery ratio of separated gas.


Author(s):  
Henry A. Long ◽  
Ting Wang

Abstract The baseline Integrated Mild-Partial Gasification Combined (IMPGC) Cycle model developed in Part 1 is compared with other established power system designs, including the likes of subcritical and ultra-supercritical (USC) Rankine cycle systems, Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) systems, and Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) systems. A comprehensive comparison and analysis of the pros and cons, the thermodynamic performance, and environmental impact of each system are performed. The results show that, with a very conservative approach, IMPGC consistently outperforms all other forms of coal-based power, being outclassed only (expectedly) by NGCC. IMPGC is more efficient than the standard subcritical Rankine cycle by nine percentage points, more than a USC Rankine cycle by nearly four points, and more than IGCC by seven points.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document