Cool temperature hinders flux from glucose to sucrose during cellulose synthesis in secondary wall stage cotton fibers

Cellulose ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 339-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Kirt Martin ◽  
Candace H. Haigler
Planta ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Montezinos ◽  
Deborah P. Delmer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanîa M. Shiga ◽  
Haibing Yang ◽  
Bryan W. Penning ◽  
Anna T. Olek ◽  
Maureen C. McCann ◽  
...  

Abstract A modified TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of the solvent-exposed glucosyl units of cellulose to uronic acids, followed by carboxyl reduction with NaBD 4 to 6-deutero- and 6,6-dideuteroglucosyl units, provided a robust method for determining relative proportions of disordered amorphous, ordered surface chains, and anhydrous core-crystalline residues of cellulose microfibrils inaccessible to TEMPO. Both glucosyl residues of cellobiose units, digested from amorphous chains of cellulose with a combination of cellulase and cellobiohydrolase, were deuterated, whereas those from anhydrous chains were undeuterated. By contrast, solvent-exposed and anhydrous residues alternate in surface chains, so only one of the two residues of cellobiosyl units was labeled. Although current estimates indicate that each cellulose microfibril comprises only 18 to 24 (1 , 4)- b eta-D-glucan chains, we show here that microfibrils of walls of Arabidopsis leaves and maize coleoptiles, and those of secondary wall cellulose of cotton fibers and poplar wood, bundle into much larger macrofibrils, with 67 to 86% of the glucan chains in the anhydrous domain. These results indicate extensive bundling of microfibrils into macrofibrils occurs during both primary and secondary wall formation. We discuss how, beyond lignin, the degree of bundling into macrofibrils contributes an additional recalcitrance factor to lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic or chemical catalytic conversion to biofuel substrates.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 4421-4438 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.-B. Han ◽  
Y.-B. Li ◽  
H.-Y. Wang ◽  
X.-M. Wu ◽  
C.-L. Li ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1540-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuijin Hua ◽  
Xuede Wang ◽  
Shuna Yuan ◽  
Mingyan Shao ◽  
Xiangqian Zhao ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Tanaka ◽  
Kazumasa Murata ◽  
Muneo Yamazaki ◽  
Katsura Onosato ◽  
Akio Miyao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
W.R. Goynes ◽  
B. F. Ingber ◽  
B.A. Triplett

Secondary wall thickness is considered to be a function of maturity in cotton fibers. Normal fibers are formed from a single epidermal cell of a fertilized ovule. Development of these cells into fibers occurs in two, possibly overlapping, stages. Fibers begin to elongate at anthesis, and elongation continues for approximately 20 days postanthesis (DPA). As this elongation period ends, deposition of secondary wall begins, and continues for 25-30 days until the boll “matures” and opens. The exact period of elongation and secondary thickening is dependent on factors such as variety, growing temperature, and light level. Between six and nine weeks, wall thickening terminates as bolls begin to open.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e105088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Chen ◽  
Fengjuan Lv ◽  
Jingran Liu ◽  
Yina Ma ◽  
Youhua Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (27) ◽  
pp. E6366-E6374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Watanabe ◽  
Rene Schneider ◽  
Sarah Barkwill ◽  
Eliana Gonzales-Vigil ◽  
Joseph L. Hill ◽  
...  

In plants, plasma membrane-embedded CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) enzyme complexes deposit cellulose polymers into the developing cell wall. Cellulose synthesis requires two different sets of CESA complexes that are active during cell expansion and secondary cell wall thickening, respectively. Hence, developing xylem cells, which first undergo cell expansion and subsequently deposit thick secondary walls, need to completely reorganize their CESA complexes from primary wall- to secondary wall-specific CESAs. Using live-cell imaging, we analyzed the principles underlying this remodeling. At the onset of secondary wall synthesis, the primary wall CESAs ceased to be delivered to the plasma membrane and were gradually removed from both the plasma membrane and the Golgi. For a brief transition period, both primary wall- and secondary wall-specific CESAs coexisted in banded domains of the plasma membrane where secondary wall synthesis is concentrated. During this transition, primary and secondary wall CESAs displayed discrete dynamic behaviors and sensitivities to the inhibitor isoxaben. As secondary wall-specific CESAs were delivered and inserted into the plasma membrane, the primary wall CESAs became concentrated in prevacuolar compartments and lytic vacuoles. This adjustment in localization between the two CESAs was accompanied by concurrent decreased primary wall CESA and increased secondary wall CESA protein abundance. Our data reveal distinct and dynamic subcellular trafficking patterns that underpin the remodeling of the cellulose biosynthetic machinery, resulting in the removal and degradation of the primary wall CESA complex with concurrent production and recycling of the secondary wall CESAs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document