Adolescent Risk Behavior in Italy and The Netherlands

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Ciairano ◽  
Wendy Kliewer ◽  
Emanuela Rabaglietti

Jessor et al.’s (2003) model of relationships among protective factors (models protection, controls protection, support protection), risk factors (models risk, opportunity risk, vulnerability risk), and adolescent risk behavior (delinquency, problem drinking, marijuana use, tobacco use, sexual activity) was investigated in adolescent samples of both genders from Italy (n = 488, M age = 17 years) and the Netherlands (n = 480, M age = 17 years). After accounting for sociodemographic variables, risk and protective factors and their interactions accounted for 46–52% of additional variation in risk behavior. Although levels of risk, protection, and risk behavior differed by country and by sex, the association of risk and protective factors with risk behavior was similar for Italian and Dutch youth and for boys and girls. Controls protection (e.g., intolerance of deviancy, parental control and disapproval, friends’ disapproval) and models of risk (family and peer models of risk behavior) had the strongest associations with adjustment. Additionally, controls protection moderated the influence of models risk among the Italians while support protection buffered vulnerability risk among the Dutch. These data support the utility of the explanatory model in these national contexts.

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Maslowsky ◽  
Daniel P. Keating ◽  
Christopher S. Monk ◽  
John Schulenberg

Risk behavior contributes to substantial morbidity and mortality during adolescence. This study examined neurocognitive predictors of proposed subtypes of adolescent risk behavior: planned (premeditated) versus unplanned (spontaneous). Adolescents (N = 69, 49% male, M = 15.1 [1.0] years) completed neurocognitive tasks (Iowa Gambling Task [IGT], and Game of Dice Task [GDT]) and a self-report measure indicating whether past-year risk behaviors were planned or unplanned. As hypothesized, identifying more beneficial choices on the neurocognitive tasks and perceiving benefits of risk behavior to outweigh costs predicted engagement in planned versus unplanned risk behavior. This study is the first to use neurocognitive assessments to differentiate planned and unplanned subtypes of risk behavior. Understanding mechanisms underlying these subtypes may inform prevention programs targeting specific contributors to adolescent risk behavior.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismaini Zain ◽  
Kartika Fithiasari ◽  
Erma Permatasari ◽  
Tyas Nastiti ◽  
Mardyono Mardyono ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kay Jankowski ◽  
Harriet J. Rosenberg ◽  
Anjana Sengupta ◽  
Stanley D. Rosenberg ◽  
George L. Wolford

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-412
Author(s):  
Jung Yeon Lee ◽  
Wonkuk Kim ◽  
Judith S. Brook ◽  
Stephen J. Finch ◽  
David W. Brook

1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 683
Author(s):  
Marvin D. Krohn ◽  
Richard Jessor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document