Murphy-Berman, V., & Berman, J.J. (Eds.): Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Series, vol. 49)

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-284
Author(s):  
John W. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
The Self ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences

scholarly journals Problemi istraživanja self-koncepta, posebice self-koncepta mladih

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katica Lacković-Grgin
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Psychological Constructs ◽  
The Third ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Definition Of

The results of the previous researches of the self-concept were often controversial creating so some difficulties for comparison and verification. The resource of these deficiencies was in the definition of ithe self-concept which was imprecise and unlike and also in bad metric characteristics of the instruments involved in the research. After well-known researches like Wylie (1974 and 1979) the new researches, encouraged by those, were divided lin 3 groups. In the first group authors examined the metric characteristics of the well-known and long used scales and they also constructed new scales serving for the measurement of self-concept. Those examinations showed the untenableness of some aspects concerning the uni-dimension of the self-concept. The second group examined the theoretical consistency of the self-concept and its relations to the related psychological constructs. The third group worked on the self-concept of youth which was different from the previous and it also and the cross-cultural differences. These studies supported a comprehension of th eself-concept of youth which was different from tile previous and it also supported an idea of a construct being examined within his own culture and also with the instruments available in that culture.

Cognitive gadgets: A provocative but flawed manifesto

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Twin Studies ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
Genetic Inheritance ◽  
Double Standards ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences ◽  
Cherry Picking ◽  
Dichotomous Thinking

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.

Cross-Cultural Differences in the Temporal Distribution of Autobiographical Memory

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve M. J. Janssen ◽  
Anna Gralak ◽  
Yayoi Kawasaki ◽  
Gert Kristo ◽  
Pedro M. Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autobiographical Memory ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document