Arithmetic Fact Retrieval

2015 ◽  
Vol 223 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Busch ◽  
Claudia Schmidt ◽  
Dietmar Grube

When diagnosing children with learning disorders (as per ICD-10), their scholastic performance has to be significantly below the level of intelligence. Although this discrepancy criterion has received much criticism in the field of literacy, few researchers in mathematics have examined it. We used a two (mathematical performance) by two (intelligence) factorial design to analyze the arithmetic fact retrieval of low-performing children in mathematics who met the criterion (developmental dyscalculia) or did not (mathematical difficulties) and of two groups of average-achieving children matched for intelligence. The four groups (each n = 27 third-graders) were matched for their attention span and their literacy skills. Children solved addition verification tasks with numbers up to 10 and 20 under standard and under dual task conditions requiring further working memory capacity to evaluate the potential use of counting strategies. Performance in addition tasks proved to be associated with mathematical achievement especially in the higher number range, whereas dual task performance did not point to the use of counting strategies among low performers in mathematics. No interaction between mathematics and intelligence was identified, which would have confirmed the discrepancy criterion. These results illustrate that stable knowledge of arithmetic facts is essential for mathematical achievement, regardless of whether the discrepancy criterion is met.

2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf Träff ◽  
Kenny Skagerlund ◽  
Linda Olsson ◽  
Rickard Östergren

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Jost ◽  
Patrick H. Khader ◽  
Michael Burke ◽  
Siegfried Bien ◽  
Frank Rösler

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1279-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Clemens ◽  
Stefanie Jung ◽  
Mikhail Zvyagintsev ◽  
Frank Domahs ◽  
Klaus Willmes

2010 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-299
Author(s):  
B. Prieto-Corona ◽  
M. Rodríguez-Camacho ◽  
J. Silva-Pereyra ◽  
E. Marosi ◽  
J. Bernal ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 468 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belén Prieto-Corona ◽  
Mario Rodríguez-Camacho ◽  
Juan Silva-Pereyra ◽  
Erzsébet Marosi ◽  
Thalía Fernández ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2603-2614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier Guzmán Muñoz

The main objective of this study was to influence implicit learning through two different classical manipulations and to inspect whether working memory capacity (WMC) and personality were related to the different measures of learning. With that purpose, in Experiment 1 we asked 172 undergraduate students of psychology to perform a serial reaction time (SRT) task under single- or dual-task conditions and to complete a WMC task and a personality test. In Experiment 2, 164 students performed the SRT task under incidental or intentional conditions and also filled a WMC task and a personality test. In both experiments, WMC influenced learning, but this relation was found only when attention was not loaded (Experiment 1) or when intentional instructions were given (Experiment 2). The pattern of relations with personality, although more varied, also showed a commonality between both experiments: learning under the most implicit conditions correlated positively with extraversion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document