scholarly journals Sulfur isotope constraints on the petrogenesis of the Kimberley kimberlites

Author(s):  
Angus Fitzpayne ◽  
Andrea Giuliani ◽  
Nivea Magalhães ◽  
Ashton Soltys ◽  
Marco L. Fiorentini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
◽  
Yuansheng Du ◽  
Yuansheng Du ◽  
Thomas J. Algeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja M. Meyer ◽  
◽  
Angus Williams ◽  
Jamie Johnson ◽  
Christopher K. Junium ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Benson ◽  
◽  
Edward M. Ripley ◽  
Chusi Li ◽  
Robert Mahin
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mikael Vasilopoulos ◽  
Ferenc Molnár ◽  
Hugh O’Brien ◽  
Yann Lahaye ◽  
Marie Lefèbvre ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Juomasuo Au–Co deposit, currently classified as an orogenic gold deposit with atypical metal association, is located in the Paleoproterozoic Kuusamo belt in northeastern Finland. The volcano-sedimentary sequence that hosts the deposit was intensely altered, deformed, and metamorphosed to greenschist facies during the 1.93–1.76 Ga Svecofennian orogeny. In this study, we investigate the temporal relationship between Co and Au deposition and the relationship of metal enrichment with protolith composition and alteration mineralogy by utilizing lithogeochemical data and petrographic observations. We also investigate the nature of fluids involved in deposit formation based on sulfide trace element and sulfur isotope LA-ICP-MS data together with tourmaline mineral chemistry and boron isotopes. Classification of original protoliths was made on the basis of geochemically immobile elements; recognized lithologies are metasedimentary rocks, mafic, intermediate-composition, and felsic metavolcanic rocks, and an ultramafic sill. The composition of the host rocks does not control the type or intensity of mineralization. Sulfur isotope values (δ34S − 2.6 to + 7.1‰) and trace element data obtained for pyrite, chalcopyrite, and pyrrhotite indicate that the two geochemically distinct Au–Co and Co ore types formed from fluids of different compositions and origins. A reduced, metamorphic fluid was responsible for deposition of the pyrrhotite-dominant, Co-rich ore, whereas a relatively oxidized fluid deposited the pyrite-dominant Au–Co ore. The main alteration and mineralization stages at Juomasuo are as follows: (1) widespread albitization that predates both types of mineralization; (2) stage 1, Co-rich mineralization associated with chlorite (± biotite ± amphibole) alteration; (3) stage 2, Au–Co mineralization related to sericitization. Crystal-chemical compositions for tourmaline suggest the involvement of evaporite-related fluids in formation of the deposit; boron isotope data also allow for this conclusion. Results of our research indicate that the metal association in the Juomasuo Au–Co deposit was formed by spatially coincident and multiple hydrothermal processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document