Response of the low‐level jet to precession and its implications for proxies of the Indian monsoon

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chetankumar Jalihal ◽  
Jayaraman Srinivasan ◽  
Arindam Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Indian Monsoon ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Jet

Remote influences on the Indian monsoon Low-Level Jet intraseasonal variations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Izumo ◽  
Maratt Satheesan Swathi ◽  
Matthieu Lengaigne ◽  
Jérôme Vialard ◽  
Dr Ramesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Indian Ocean ◽  
Indian Summer Monsoon ◽  
Arabian Sea ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Indian Monsoon ◽  
Westerly Wind ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Intraseasonal Variations ◽  
The Indian Ocean ◽  
Low Level Jet

<p>A strong Low-Level Jet (LLJ), also known as the Findlater jet, develops over the Arabian Sea during the Indian summer monsoon. This jet is an essential source of moisture for monsoonal rainfall over the densely-populated Indian subcontinent and is a key contributor to the Indian Ocean oceanic productivity by sustaining the western Arabian Sea upwelling systems. The LLJ intensity fluctuates intraseasonally within the ~20- to 90-day band, in relation with the northward-propagating active and break phases of the Indian summer monsoon. Our observational analyses reveal that these large-scale regional convective perturbations  only explain about half of the intraseasonal LLJ variance, the other half being unrelated to large-scale convective perturbations over the Indian Ocean. We show that convective fluctuations in two regions outside the Indian Ocean can remotely force a LLJ intensification, four days later. Enhanced atmosphericdeep convection over the northwestern tropical Pacific yields westerly wind anomalies that propagate westward to the Arabian Sea as baroclinic atmospheric Rossby Waves. Suppressed convection over the eastern Pacific / North American monsoon region yields westerly wind anomalies that propagate eastward to the Indian Ocean as dry baroclinic equatorial Kelvin waves. Those largely independent remote influences jointly explain ~40% of the intraseasonal LLJ variance that is not related to convective perturbations over the Indian Ocean (i.e. ~20% of the total), with the northwestern Pacific contributing twice as much as the eastern Pacific. Taking into account these two remote influences should thus enhance the ability to predict the LLJ.</p><p> </p><p>Related reference: Swathi M.S, Takeshi Izumo, Matthieu Lengaigne, Jérôme Vialard and M.R. Ramesh Kumar:Remote influences on the Indian monsoon Low-Level Jet intraseasonal variations, accepted in Climate Dynamics.</p>

scholarly journals Response of the low-level jet to precession and its implications for proxies of the Indian monsoon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chetankumar Jalihal ◽  
Jayaraman Srinivasan ◽  
Arindam Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Indian Monsoon ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Jet

Remote influences on the Indian monsoon low-level jet intraseasonal variations

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 2221-2236
Author(s):  
M. S. Swathi ◽  
Takeshi Izumo ◽  
Matthieu Lengaigne ◽  
Jérôme Vialard ◽  
M. R. Ramesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Indian Monsoon ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Intraseasonal Variations ◽  
Low Level Jet

scholarly journals Intriguing Aspects of the Monsoon Low-Level Jet over Peninsular India Revealed by High-Resolution GPS Radiosonde Observations

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1413-1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Roja Raman ◽  
M. Venkat Ratnam ◽  
M. Rajeevan ◽  
V. V. M. Jagannadha Rao ◽  
S. Vijaya Bhaskara Rao
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Indian Monsoon ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Vertical Variation ◽  
Peninsular India ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Jet ◽  
Core Height ◽  
Gps Radiosonde ◽  
Monsoon Dynamics

Abstract The strong cross-equatorial flow in the lower troposphere, widely known as the monsoon low-level jet (MLLJ), plays an important role in the Indian summer monsoon (ISM) rainfall during June–September. Using high-resolution GPS radiosonde observations over Gadanki (13.5°N, 79.2°E), some new aspects of MLLJ have been reported. In the present study it is found that, on average, the MLLJ exists at 710 hPa over southeastern peninsular India, rather than at 850 hPa as reported by earlier studies. It is observed that the ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA)-Interim data provide better results on the spatial, temporal, and vertical variation of MLLJ. Further, the characteristics of the MLLJ during the active and break spells of ISM are also investigated; higher MLLJ core height and intensity are found during active phases of the Indian monsoon. This study emphasizes the use of high-resolution measurements for studying monsoon dynamics in detail.

Understanding the influence of ENSO on the Great Plains low-level jet in CMIP5 models

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1537-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Danco ◽  
Elinor R. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Jet

scholarly journals Nocturnal Low-Level Jet in a Mountain Basin Complex. Part II: Transport and Diffusion of Tracer under Stable Conditions

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 740-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Darby ◽  
K. Jerry Allwine ◽  
Robert M. Banta
Keyword(s):  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Salt Lake ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Stable Conditions ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Flow Features ◽  
Transport And Diffusion ◽  
Low Level Jet ◽  
The City ◽  
And Diffusion

Abstract Differences in nighttime transport and diffusion of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer in an urban complex-terrain setting (Salt Lake City, Utah) are investigated using surface and Doppler lidar wind data and large-scale surface pressure differences. Interacting scales of motion, as studied through the URBAN 2000 field program combined with the Vertical Transport and Mixing (VTMX) experiment, explained the differences in the tracer behavior during three separate intensive operating periods. With an emphasis on nighttime stable boundary layer conditions, these field programs were designed to study flow features responsible for the nighttime transport of airborne substances. This transport has implications for air quality, homeland security, and emergency response if the airborne substances are hazardous. The important flow features investigated included thermally forced canyon and slope flows and a low-level jet (LLJ) that dominated the basin-scale winds when the surface pressure gradient was weak. The presence of thermally forced flows contributed to the complexity and hindered the predictability of the tracer motion within and beyond the city. When organized thermally forced flows were present, the tracer tended to stay closer to the city for longer periods of time, even though a strong basin-scale LLJ did develop. When thermally forced flows were short lived or absent, the basin-scale low-level jet dominated the wind field and enhanced the transport of tracer material out of the city.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document