Personality testing and the assessment center: Incremental validity for managerial selection.

1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 746-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Goffin ◽  
Mitchell G. Rothstein ◽  
Norman G. Johnston
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Lievens ◽  
Etienne Van Keer ◽  
Ellen Volckaert

Although computerization and standardization might make assessment center (AC) exercises easier to administer and score, drawbacks are that most of such exercises have a static and multiple-choice format. This study reports on the development and initial validation of a computerized and standardized AC exercise that simulates key managerial tasks. This AC exercise capitalizes not only on the benefits of computerization and standardization (efficiency and cost savings) but at the same time aims to avoid their usual drawbacks (lower response fidelity and interactivity). The composite exercise score was significantly related to several criteria of interest and had incremental validity beyond cognitive ability. The exercise was also significantly related to candidates’ people management competencies.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leaetta M. Hough ◽  
Frederick L. Oswald

As the title suggests, this article takes a broad perspective on personality as it is conceptualized and measured in organizational research, and in the spirit of this Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology journal, we framed the article as a series of 7 questions. These 7 questions deal with (1) personality and multidimensional models of performance, (2) personality taxonomies and the five-factor model, (3) the effects of situations on personality–performance relationships, (4) the incremental validity of personality over cognitive ability, (5) the need to differentiate personality constructs from personality measures, (6) the concern with faking on personality tests, and (7) the use of personality tests in attempting to address adverse impact. We dovetail these questions with our perspectives and insights in the hope that this will stimulate further discussion with our readership.


1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Dakin ◽  
V. Nilakant ◽  
Ross Jensen

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
HAROLD W. GOLDSTEIN ◽  
KENNETH P. YUSKO ◽  
ERIC P. BRAVERMAN ◽  
D. BRENT SMITH ◽  
BETH CHUNG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document