The Role of Personality Testing in Managerial Selection

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Dakin ◽  
V. Nilakant ◽  
Ross Jensen
1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz S. Ones ◽  
Chockalingam Viswesvaran ◽  
Angelika D. Reiss

Author(s):  
Hairong Li ◽  
Jinyan Fan ◽  
Guoxiang Zhao ◽  
Minghui Wang ◽  
Lu Zheng ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley A. Scroggins ◽  
Steven L. Thomas ◽  
Jerry A. Morris

This article is the first in a three-part series that examines the development of selection testing. Part I focuses on the historical development of personnel selection testing from the late 19th century to the present, with particular attention given to personality testing. Attention is given to the efforts of early industrial psychologists that shaped and defined the role of testing in the scientific selection of employees. Part II examines the development of methods and standards in employment testing with particular emphasis on selection validity and utility. Issues of selection fairness and discrimination in selection are explored as they relate to psychological testing. Part III explores the development and application of personality testing. The transient nature of models of personality is noted, and current paradigms and the utility and fairness of personality testing for modern organizations are discussed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 746-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Goffin ◽  
Mitchell G. Rothstein ◽  
Norman G. Johnston

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document