Coping with chronic illness: A study of illness controllability and the influence of coping strategies on psychological adjustment.

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Felton ◽  
Tracey A. Revenson
1994 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Edelmann ◽  
Kevin J. Connolly ◽  
Helen Bartlett

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 769-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiying Xiong ◽  
Yuchun Zhou

In this study, we explore East Asian graduate students’ socio-cultural and psychological adjustment in a U.S. Midwestern University. Eight participants were interviewed about their acculturation challenges as well as their effective coping strategies. Data were analyzed using open-coding techniques and five themes emerged: three themes summarized the challenges, including challenges due to cultural differences, lack of support in a foreign environment, and financial stress; and the other two themes that described the coping strategies were utilizing external resources and developing self-adjustment strategies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1286-1306
Author(s):  
Stacy C. Parenteau ◽  
Katrina Hurd ◽  
Haibo Wu ◽  
Cassie Feck

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e001475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrianna Murphy ◽  
Catherine McGowan ◽  
Martin McKee ◽  
Marc Suhrcke ◽  
Kara Hanson

BackgroundExperiencing illness in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) can incur very high out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for healthcare and, while the existing literature typically focuses on levels of expenditure, it rarely examines what happens when households do not have the necessary money. Some will adopt one or more ‘coping strategies’, such as borrowing money, perhaps at exorbitant interest rates, or selling assets, some necessary for their future income, with detrimental long-term effects. This is particularly relevant for chronic illnesses that require consistent, long-term OOP payments. We systematically review the literature on strategies for financing OOP costs of chronic illnesses in LMICs, their correlates and their impacts on households.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EconLit, EMBASE, Global Health and Scopus on 22 October 2018 for literature published on or after 1 January 2000. We included qualitative or quantitative studies describing at least one coping strategy for chronic illness OOP payments in a LMIC context. Our narrative review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines.ResultsForty-seven papers were included. Studies identified coping strategies for chronic illness costs that are not traditionally addressed in financial risk protection research (eg, taking children out of school, sending them to work, reducing expenditure on food or education, quitting work to give care). Twenty studies reported socioeconomic or other correlates of coping strategies, with poorer households and those with more advanced disease more vulnerable to detrimental strategies. Only six studies (three cross-sectional and three qualitative) included evidence of impacts of coping strategies on households, including increased labour to repay debts and discontinuing treatment.ConclusionsMonitoring of financial risk protection provides an incomplete picture if it fails to capture the effect of coping strategies. This will require qualitative and longitudinal research to understand the long-term effects, especially those associated with chronic illness in LMICs.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 845-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. K. Stein ◽  
Dorothy Jones Jessop

The ongoing care needed by children with chronic physical illness is a topic of national concern. The Pediatric Ambulatory Care Treatment Study (PACTS) is a classic pretest-posttest randomized experiment designed to evaluate a Pediatric Home Care (PHC) program in which an interdisciplinary team provides comprehensive primary health care, support, coordination, patient advocacy, and education to chronically ill children and their families. Home interviews were conducted by an independent research team with the 219 families at enrollment, 6 months, and 1 year; 80% completed all three interviews. Analyses indicate that pediatric home care is effective in improving the satisfaction of the family with care, in improving the child's psychological adjustment, and in lessening the psychiatric symptoms of the mother. The functional status of the children was equally well maintained in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the impact of the illness on the family between the two groups. There are indications that there may be a dose-related effect with respect to the child's psychological adjustment with those in the program for the longest period of time showing the greatest benefit. Such a home care program can be an effective intervention for minimizing the social and psychological consequences of chronic illness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document