Relationship of vocational personality and research training environment to the research productivity of counseling psychologists.

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 362-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Krebs ◽  
James W. Smither ◽  
Robert B. Hurley
1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Gelso ◽  
Brent Mallinckrodt ◽  
Ann Brust Judge

This study sought to enhance the reliability of the Research Training Environment Scale (RTES) at the subscale level and to determine the relationship of the research training environment to several variables theorized to be either related or unrelated to that environment. One hundred seventy-three graduate students from 6 doctoral programs in counseling, clinical, and school psychology responded to the measures. Internal consistency and retest reliability of the RTES were substantially improved Consistent with our hypotheses, all 9 subscales and the total score of the revised RTES correlated positively with research self-efficacy and changes in attitudes toward research during graduate education; likewise, as expected, the RTES was unrelated to participants' interest in the practitioner role and minimally related to their general self-esteem. Contrary to the hypotheses, RTES was minimally related to interest in the role of scientist.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202
Author(s):  
John M. McConnell ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Eric M. Brown ◽  
Christin J. Fort ◽  
Donna R. Azcuna ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey H. Kahn ◽  
Charles J. Gelso

The factor structure of the Research Training Environment Scale-Revised was examined in a sample of 270 graduate students in counseling psychology. This confirmatory factor analysis assessed the fit of a nine-factor model corresponding to the respective subscales on the measure, as well as the fit of a second-order factor structure suggested by an exploratory factor analysis of data. The second-order factor structure fit very well when conducted on manifest (i.e., observed) subscale total scores; the results were more ambiguous when first-order latent factors were included in the factor structure. The analyses suggested that an instructional dimension and an interpersonal dimension are global factors of the research training environment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (124) ◽  
pp. 44-84
Author(s):  
Kristine R Brancolini ◽  
Marie R Kennedy

Research self-efficacy – or research confidence – has been shown to be a predictor of research productivity. There is also some evidence that it is a mediating factor between the research training environment and research productivity. To explore the connection between research training and research self-efficacy, the authors developed, validated, and later expanded a scale to measure research self-efficacy among academic librarians. They used the expanded 38-item scale to measure the research self-efficacy of participants from a three-year research training workshop for academic librarians, comparing results before and after the workshop. Participants experienced significant increases in research self-efficacy across all 38-questions, within the annual cohorts and across all three years. The question-level results were used to make changes to the summer workshops in Years 2 and 3, in order to improve the effectiveness of the summer workshop to increase research self-efficacy. This study confirms that a measurement of research self-efficacy can be a useful tool in assessing the effectiveness of research training and improving that training.


Psychotherapy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Gelso ◽  
Ellen C. Baumann ◽  
Harold T. Chui ◽  
Alexandra E. Savela

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Gelso ◽  
Brent Mallinckrodt ◽  
Ann Brust Judge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document