Predicting object features across saccades: Evidence from object recognition and visual search.

2014 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 1903-1922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvid Herwig ◽  
Werner X. Schneider
2010 ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
J Wagemans ◽  
K Verfaillie ◽  
E Ver Eecke ◽  
G d’Ydewalle

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2753
Author(s):  
Frederik Beuth ◽  
Danny Kowerko ◽  
Fred H. Hamker

2008 ◽  
Vol 364 (1515) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L Hoffman ◽  
N.K Logothetis

Learning about the world through our senses constrains our ability to recognise our surroundings. Experience shapes perception. What is the neural basis for object recognition and how are learning-induced changes in recognition manifested in neural populations? We consider first the location of neurons that appear to be critical for object recognition, before describing what is known about their function. Two complementary processes of object recognition are considered: discrimination among diagnostic object features and generalization across non-diagnostic features. Neural plasticity appears to underlie the development of discrimination and generalization for a given set of features, though tracking these changes directly over the course of learning has remained an elusive task.


Author(s):  
Delowar Hossain ◽  
Genci Capi ◽  
Mitsuru Jindai ◽  
Shin-ichiro Kaneko

Purpose Development of autonomous robot manipulator for human-robot assembly tasks is a key component to reach high effectiveness. In such tasks, the robot real-time object recognition is crucial. In addition, the need for simple and safe teaching techniques need to be considered, because: small size robot manipulators’ presence in everyday life environments is increasing requiring non-expert operators to teach the robot; and in small size applications, the operator has to teach several different motions in a short time. Design/methodology/approach For object recognition, the authors propose a deep belief neural network (DBNN)-based approach. The captured camera image is used as the input of the DBNN. The DBNN extracts the object features in the intermediate layers. In addition, the authors developed three teaching systems which utilize iPhone; haptic; and Kinect devices. Findings The object recognition by DBNN is robust for real-time applications. The robot picks up the object required by the user and places it in the target location. Three developed teaching systems are easy to use by non-experienced subjects, and they show different performance in terms of time to complete the task and accuracy. Practical implications The proposed method can ease the use of robot manipulators helping non-experienced users completing different assembly tasks. Originality/value This work applies DBNN for object recognition and three intuitive systems for teaching robot manipulators.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089198872110160
Author(s):  
Francesco Cimminella ◽  
Giorgia D’Innocenzo ◽  
Sergio Della Sala ◽  
Alessandro Iavarone ◽  
Caterina Musella ◽  
...  

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients underperform on a range of tasks requiring semantic processing, but it is unclear whether this impairment is due to a generalised loss of semantic knowledge or to issues in accessing and selecting such information from memory. The objective of this eye-tracking visual search study was to determine whether semantic expectancy mechanisms known to support object recognition in healthy adults are preserved in AD patients. Furthermore, as AD patients are often reported to be impaired in accessing information in extra-foveal vision, we investigated whether that was also the case in our study. Twenty AD patients and 20 age-matched controls searched for a target object among an array of distractors presented extra-foveally. The distractors were either semantically related or unrelated to the target (e.g., a car in an array with other vehicles or kitchen items). Results showed that semantically related objects were detected with more difficulty than semantically unrelated objects by both groups, but more markedly by the AD group. Participants looked earlier and for longer at the critical objects when these were semantically unrelated to the distractors. Our findings show that AD patients can process the semantics of objects and access it in extra-foveal vision. This suggests that their impairments in semantic processing may reflect difficulties in accessing semantic information rather than a generalised loss of semantic memory.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 525
Author(s):  
Jing Xu ◽  
Alejandro Lleras ◽  
Simona Buetti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document