scholarly journals Trajectories of in-session change language in brief motivational interventions with mandated college students.

2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Borsari ◽  
Timothy R. Apodaca ◽  
Kristina M. Jackson ◽  
Anne Fernandez ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. JCPSY-D-21-00004
Author(s):  
Yasmine Omar

Evidence indicates that motivation early in treatment is critical to treatment outcome, and motivational interviewing (MI) has addressed this finding by helping individuals work through ambivalence about change. Not only has it demonstrated improvements in treatment outcome across treatment populations and settings, it has been adapted with success into brief motivational interventions. This special issue explores the use of MI with populations at great risk for ambivalence in therapy, including college students violating campus policy, individuals who have been trafficked, and individuals in exposure therapy. The papers further highlight the versatility of MI-based interventions, as well as their limitations, that may help inform future directions for adapting MI as we move toward digital and web-based interventions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 988-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel F. Acuff ◽  
Andrew T. Voss ◽  
Ashley A. Dennhardt ◽  
Brian Borsari ◽  
Matthew P. Martens ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Borsari ◽  
Erica Eaton Short ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
John T.P. Hustad ◽  
Tracy O’Leary Tevyaw ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. P. Hustad ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Lan Kong ◽  
Rachel Urwin ◽  
Suzanne Zeman ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Wogksch ◽  
Jeremiah Weinstock ◽  
Garret Ash ◽  
Linda Pescatello

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (14) ◽  
pp. 1883-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Bernstein ◽  
Grayson L. Baird ◽  
Miryam Yusufov ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Kate B. Carey ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Borsari ◽  
Timothy R. Apodaca ◽  
Kristina M. Jackson ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Molly Magill ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
TaShauna U. Goldsby ◽  
Jeremiah Weinstock ◽  
Nancy M. Petry ◽  
Jeffery Capizzi ◽  
Linda S. Pescatello

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document