Supplemental Material for What is Text Reading Fluency and Is It a Predictor or an Outcome of Reading Comprehension? A Longitudinal Investigation

2017 ◽  
Vol 41-42 ◽  
pp. 8-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Solari ◽  
Ryan Grimm ◽  
Nancy S. McIntyre ◽  
Lindsay Swain- Lerro ◽  
Matthew Zajic ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 002221942093213
Author(s):  
Nathan H. Clemens ◽  
Yu-Yu Hsiao ◽  
Kejin Lee ◽  
Amanda Martinez-Lincoln ◽  
Clinton Moore ◽  
...  

Reading comprehension tests vary in format and characteristics, which may influence the extent to which component skills are involved in test performance. With students in Grades 6 to 8 with reading difficulties, dominance analyses examined the differential importance of component reading and language skills (word- and text-reading fluency, vocabulary, listening comprehension, and working memory) on several standardized tests of reading comprehension: The Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test, 4th edition (GMRT), Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation, Gray Oral Reading Test, 5th edition (GORT-5), and the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC). Students’ word- and text-reading fluency skills were generally the most dominant predictors of performance on most reading comprehension tests, especially those with a time limit (GMRT and TOSREC). Listening comprehension was most important on the GORT-5, a test in which students read passages orally and listen to questions read by an examiner. Working memory was the least important component skill across the reading comprehension tests. Overall, results were consistent with previous work indicating that reading comprehension measures vary with regard to the skills or knowledge sources that are most important for test performance and extend these findings to struggling adolescent readers. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 448
Author(s):  
Xiangying Jiang

<em>Cross-linguistic studies on second language (L2) reading reveal that component skills of reading such as word recognition, phonemic decoding, spelling, and oral text reading are prone to the influence of first language (L1) orthography but few empirical studies have examined the possible influence of L1 orthography on these skills. This study investigates how adult ESL learners of two different L1 backgrounds (Spanish and Chinese) compare in their performances on word recognition efficiency, phonemic decoding efficiency, spelling, and oral text reading fluency and how these skills are related to their overall ability in reading comprehension. The differences in the learners’ performances on the component skills and the variations in the role of these skills in ESL reading comprehension indicated possible influence of the orthographic features of learners’ first language.</em>


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Suk Kim ◽  
Chea Hyeong Park ◽  
Richard K. Wagner

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie J. Veenendaal ◽  
Margriet A. Groen ◽  
Ludo Verhoeven

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-248
Author(s):  
Mallory A. Stevens ◽  
Matthew K. Burns

Abstract The purpose of the current study was to determine the extent to which practicing keywords increased word recognition, reading fluency and comprehension for students with intellectual disability (ID). The dependent measures included word recognition (i.e., the percentage of previously unknown keywords read correctly in the given text), reading fluency (i.e., words read correctly in 1 minute), and reading comprehension (i.e., number of questions answered correctly out of five). The participants were three fourth-grade students who were identified as having ID in early childhood with IQ scores of 45, 62, and 78. Words from reading passages were practiced with Incremental Rehearsal (IR) using a multielement, single-case design. Practicing keywords led to higher subsequent in-text recognition and generalization for a high percentage of the taught words. Additionally, there was clear experimental control for increases in reading fluency. There was not a strong effect on reading comprehension. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document