Comparison of Global and Depressive Rumination and Their Relationship to Current and Future Dysphoria

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaylene Brinker
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilla Nóra Kovács ◽  
Dániel Baksa ◽  
Dóra Dobos ◽  
Nóra Eszlári ◽  
Kinga Gecse ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The main goal of this research was to explore whether migraineurs had a higher level of perceived stress than healthy controls during the times of the coronavirus and related restrictive measures, and to examine the relationship between different subtypes of rumination and perceived stress in these groups. We measured two facets of depressive rumination, brooding and reflection, along with rumination about the current COVID-19 situation to see whether these different subtypes of rumination explained perceived stress among migraineurs and healthy controls. Methods Healthy adults (n = 64) and migraine patients (n = 73) filled out self-report questionnaires online. A multiple linear regression model was used to test whether depressive rumination (i.e. brooding and reflection) and COVID-related rumination explained perceived stress among adults with and without migraine during the times of COVID-19, after controlling for gender, age, migraine/control group status and migraine disability. Results Although we did not find any difference in the level of perceived stress among migraineurs and the control group, perceived stress was more strongly associated with brooding as well as COVID-related rumination among migraineurs than healthy controls. COVID-related rumination and brooding (but not reflection) explained the level of perceived stress after controlling for gender, age, migraine/control group status and migraine disability. Conclusions The similar degree of perceived stress among migraineurs and the control group may imply that there is great variation in the personal experience of people regarding the pandemic, that may be determined by numerous other factors. Our results demonstrate that ruminating about the pandemic and related difficulties, as well as brooding (but not reflection) appear to be associated with higher level of perceived stress during the times of the coronavirus. This association was slightly stronger among migraineurs, hinting at the increased vulnerability of this patient group in stressful situations like the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results also suggest that ruminating about the pandemic and its consequences is weakly associated with trait-level depressive rumination, thus may be more contingent on specific factors.


2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1021-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannette M. Giorgio ◽  
Jacqueline Sanflippo ◽  
Evan Kleiman ◽  
Dan Reilly ◽  
Rachel E. Bender ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1450919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Hasegawa ◽  
Yoshihiko Kunisato ◽  
Hiroshi Morimoto ◽  
Haruki Nishimura ◽  
Yuko Matsuda ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 761-787
Author(s):  
Marta M. Maslej ◽  
Benoit H. Mulsant ◽  
Paul W. Andrews

Introduction: Researchers have proposed several theories of depressive rumination. To compare among them, we conducted a joint factor analysis. Methods: An online sample (n = 498) completed four rumination questionnaires and the Beck Depression Inventory. We examined associations between emerging factors and depressive symptoms. Results: Most commonly, people ruminated about solving problems in their lives, followed by the causes or consequences of negative situations. They least commonly ruminated about their symptoms and sadness. Thoughts about symptoms and causes or consequences of negative situations uniquely related to depressive symptoms. There was a circular covariance relation between depressive symptoms, thoughts about causes or consequences, and problem-solving, suggesting that symptoms are regulated by a negative feedback loop involving problem-solving. This feedback was not present unless models included thoughts about causes or consequences, suggesting that these thoughts benefit problem-solving. Discussion: Depressive rumination may be a dynamic process involving various thoughts, with different combinations of thoughts having different consequences for depression.


2008 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Costas Papageorgiou ◽  
Adrian Wells

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1581-1589
Author(s):  
Eleanor Leigh ◽  
Ailsa Lee ◽  
Hannah M. Brown ◽  
Simone Pisano ◽  
Argyris Stringaris

Abstract Although youth irritability is linked with substantial psychiatric morbidity and impairment, little is known about how personal characteristics influence its course. In this study we examined the prospective associations between angry and depressive rumination and irritability. A sample of 165 school pupils aged 12–14 years were assessed at two time points six months apart. They completed measures of irritability at Times 1 and 2 and depressive and angry rumination at Time 1. In line with our hypotheses, we found that angry rumination is significantly associated with irritability six months later, over and above baseline irritability and depressive rumination. The present findings suggest angry rumination is relevant to the genesis of irritability in adolescents, and point to possible routes for prevention and early intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document