Air combat training: Good Stick Index validation.

Author(s):  
Samuel B Moore
Keyword(s):  
Electronics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianbing Zhang ◽  
Guoqing Liu ◽  
Chaojie Yang ◽  
Jiang Wu

With the development of information technology, the degree of intelligence in air combat is increasing, and the demand for automated intelligent decision-making systems is becoming more intense. Based on the characteristics of over-the-horizon air combat, this paper constructs a super-horizon air combat training environment, which includes aircraft model modeling, air combat scene design, enemy aircraft strategy design, and reward and punishment signal design. In order to improve the efficiency of the reinforcement learning algorithm for the exploration of strategy space, this paper proposes a heuristic Q-Network method that integrates expert experience, and uses expert experience as a heuristic signal to guide the search process. At the same time, heuristic exploration and random exploration are combined. Aiming at the over-the-horizon air combat maneuver decision problem, the heuristic Q-Network method is adopted to train the neural network model in the over-the-horizon air combat training environment. Through continuous interaction with the environment, self-learning of the air combat maneuver strategy is realized. The efficiency of the heuristic Q-Network method and effectiveness of the air combat maneuver strategy are verified by simulation experiments.


1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (19) ◽  
pp. 1300-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Houck ◽  
Gary S. Thomas ◽  
Herbert H. Bell

The objective of this investigation was to identify air combat mission tasks that could be trained using existing multiship simulator technology. Forty-two mission ready F-15 pilots and 16 tactical air controllers rated their need for additional training on 41 air combat tasks. These pilots and controllers then participated in four days of air combat training using McDonnell Aircraft Company's simulation facility. This training allowed the participants to practice two-ship tactics in an unrestricted combat environment which included multiple air and ground threats, electronic combat, and real-time kill removal. Following training, the participants rated the value of their current unit training and training provided by the multiship simulation. Pilots rated the multiship simulator training superior to their current unit training for 22 of the 41 air combat tasks. Pilots also rated their need for additional training in those 22 combat tasks from “very” to “extremely” desirable. The controllers indicated that all combat tasks were better trained in the multiplayer simulation than in their current unit training program. Interviews and questionnaires also identified a number of strengths and weaknesses of the simulation that provide “lessons learned” for the development and use of future multiplayer air combat simulations.


1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-382
Author(s):  
James W. Dees ◽  
Timothy R. Cornett
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Sarah M. Sherwood ◽  
Kelly J. Neville ◽  
Angus L. M. T. McLean ◽  
Melissa M. Walwanis ◽  
Amy E. Bolton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document