Doctor's use of e-prescribing systems linked to formulary data can boost drug cost savings

2009 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 576-583
Author(s):  
Chloé Herledan ◽  
Florence Ranchon ◽  
Vérane Schwiertz ◽  
Amandine Baudouin ◽  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4786-4786
Author(s):  
Holly Trautman ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
Francesco Lo-Coco ◽  
Elizabeth James ◽  
Susan Gabriel ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Neutropenia is a common complication in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies. Severe and febrile neutropenia are associated with prolonged hospitalization, serious infections and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, increased medical costs, and increased mortality. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are often administered to reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy patients. The present analysis estimated the budget impact of increasing utilization of patient (home)-administered tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy from a US payer perspective. Methods: An interactive budget impact model was developed to estimate the changes in drug costs associated with projected increases in the market share of tbo-filgrastim from 5% to 10% and filgrastim-sndz from 10% to 12% (with a corresponding decrease in filgrastim market share from 85% to 78%) for a 1 million-member health plan. Patient self-administration at home was assumed for 20% of patients receiving short-acting G-CSF treatment; all products were purchased through the patient's pharmacy benefit and were assumed to have Tier 3 formulary status with a patient co-pay of $54 per prescription. Base-case data were derived from publicly available resources. The overall plan budget impact was calculated using a 1-year time horizon, along with the difference in per-member per-year (PMPY) cost between the current and future scenarios; one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The effective annual plan per-patient drug cost totaled between $16,961 and $27,199, depending on dose and presentation, for tbo-filgrastim, between $16,216 and $26,015 for filgrastim-sndz, and between $19,134 and $30,663 for filgrastim. The estimated overall annual plan cost associated with short-acting G-CSFs was $53,298,217 (PMPY = $53.30) in the current scenario and $52,828,832 (PMPY = $52.82) in the future scenario. Estimated cost savings totaled $469,385 (PMPY = $0.48). The model was most sensitive to changes in the overall proportion of patients self-administering G-CSFs at home and to the wholesale acquisition cost for filgrastim. Conclusions: The effective annual plan per-patient drug cost for tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz was lower by 11% and 15%, respectively, as compared with filgrastim. The present analysis estimated an annual US health plan cost savings approaching $0.5 million overall or $0.50 PMPY following an increase of market share by approximately 5% for tbo-filgrastim and 2% for filgrastim-sndz. Disclosures Trautman: Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Szabo:Eli Lilly & Company; Zoetis: Equity Ownership; Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCORI): Consultancy. Lo-Coco:Teva, Lundbeck: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Teva, Novartis, Baxalta, Pfizer: Consultancy. James:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Gabriel:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pathak:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tang:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6550-6550
Author(s):  
Di Maria Jiang ◽  
Nazanin Fallah-Rad ◽  
Roy Lee ◽  
Pamela Ng ◽  
Alan D. Smith ◽  
...  

6550 Background: Cabazitaxel is indicated for mCRPC, but is associated with substantial DW and financial strain on hospital budgets. It is only available in single-dose 60mg vials and has short reconstituted drug stability of < 24 hours. We aimed to determine feasibility and cost savings of an aggressive batching strategy to facilitate vial sharing of Cabazitaxel. Methods: Our mitigation strategy was to administer Cabazitaxel 20mg/m2 q3-weekly (without prophylactic G-CSF) on a single weekday whenever possible. Drug was prepared after patient (pt) arrival. Remaining amount from each vial was saved for subsequent pts on the same day. Amount administered, discarded and number of (#) vials used were obtained from pharmacy records. We estimated drug cost without batching by assigning 1 vial/treatment, and drug cost with batching from the actual # vials used. Cost of DW was determined from the amount discarded. All cost calculations were based on market price ($96.7CAD/mg) accounting for Sanofi’s discount incentive (5 vials for the price of 4), allowing a real-world cost assessment. Results: Between 09/2015 and 09/2018, 74 pts received 404 Cabazitaxel treatments on 164 days using 319 vials. Multiple pts were batched on 68% treatment days. Every 3 pts batched saved 1 vial. Average dose/treatment was 37mg (20-45mg). Among 10 treatment cancellations, prepared drug was administered for subsequent pts in 9 cases. Drug and DW costs over the 3-year period with and without batching are shown in Table. Conclusions: Batching ≥3 pts on a single weekday was feasible and significantly lowered drug cost of Cabazitaxel by reducing wastage. This strategy could help mitigate costs associated with wastage for other oncology drugs. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Amit Sanyal ◽  
Daniel Wellner ◽  
James Thomas ◽  
James M. Heun

Background: Ibrutinib, a small molecule inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is approved for use in a variety of lymphomas. Priced at $130,000/year, Ibrutinib imposes a significant financial burden on patients and society[1]. The study serving as the basis for the currently approved dose [2] demonstrated &gt;95% BTK receptor occupancy at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg. Data suggests that lower doses of Ibrutinib are equally effective[3] and dose reductions[4, 5] do not compromise outcome. Objective: To evaluate patient outcomes and cost savings with clinically indicated low dose (LD) of Ibrutinib in a community practice in hematological malignancies. Method: All patients treated with standard and LD Ibrutinib between January 2014 and July 2020 were identified. Reason for dose modification and best responses were abstracted. Patients with inadequate follow up or less than a week of treatment were excluded from the analysis. Responses were defined based on the iwCLL response criteria for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Lugano criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and International Working Group on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM), as applicable. To calculate drug cost at lower doses of Ibrutinib, cumulative number of patient-months on different dose levels of ibrutinib was calculated by adding the number of months each patient had remained at the dose level at the time of data cut-off. Drug cost at LD was calculated by multiplying monthly wholesale acquisition price for different dose levels of ibrutinib by the cumulative number of patient-months at that dose level. Cost differential between actual drug cost and projected drug cost at full dose was calculated. Results: 98 patients were identified. 10 were excluded from the analysis based on drug not started (3), inadequate follow-up (3), other (4). Median length of follow up for all patients was 20 months (4-70 months) and on LD Ibrutinib 12.5 months (1-60 months). 10 and 12 patients received 140 mg and 280 mg of Ibrutinib respectively due to side effects. 61 patients had CLL, 9 WM, 15 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 2 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Response rates were similar across diagnoses and dose levels (TABLE 1 and FIGURE 1). Progressive disease (PD) at low dose was seen in 2 CLL patients with complex cytogenetics, deletion 17p and extensive prior therapy. The one WM patient with PD had been extensively pretreated. Cumulative patient-months at the 140 mg and 280 mg dose levels of Ibrutinib was 177 and 123 months respectively. Drug cost for the 140 mg and 280 mg Ibrutinib cohorts were $712,276 and $989,943 respectively, for a total cost of $1,702,219. Potential drug cost for the 420 or 560 mg dose of Ibrutinib for the same duration of therapy was $3,621,828. Cumulative cost avoidance on LD Ibrutinib was $1,919, 608. Conclusions: Clinically indicated low dose Ibrutinib was equally effective and produced significant cost savings. References: 1. Qiushi Chen, N.J., Turgay Ayer, William G. Wierda, Christopher R. Flowers, Susan M. O'Brien, Michael J. Keating, Hagop M. Kantarjian, and Jagpreet Chhatwal, Economic Burden of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Era of Oral Targeted Therapies in the United States. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017: p. 166-174. 2. Ranjana H. Advani, J.J.B., Jeff P. Sharman , Sonali M. Smith , Thomas E. Boyd , Barbara GrantKathryn S. Kolibaba , Richard R. Furman , Sara Rodriguez , Betty Y. Chang , Juthamas Sukbuntherng , Raquel Izumi , Ahmed Hamdy , Eric Hedrick , Nathan, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Has Significant Activity in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013: p. 88-94. 3. Lisa S. Chen, P.B., Nichole D. Cruz , Yongying Jiang , Qi Wu , Philip A. Thompson , Shuju Feng , Michael H. Kroll , Wei Qiao , Xuelin Huang , Nitin Jain , William G. Wierda , Michael J. Keating , Varsha Gandhi, A pilot study of lower doses of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood, 2018: p. 2249-2259. 4. Lad DP, Malhotra P, Khadwal A, Prakash G, Jain A, Varma S. Reduced Dose Ibrutinib Due to Financial Toxicity in CLL. Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2018. 35(2): p. 260-264. 5. Othman S. Akhtar, K.A., Ian Lund, Ryan Hare, Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri & Pallawi Torka, Dose reductions in ibrutinib therapy are not associated with inferior outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Leukemia & Lymphoma, 2019. 60(7): p. 1650-1655. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib is approved at a dose of 420 mg orally daily or 560 mg orally daily in different lymphoproliferative disorders.


1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 1352A
Author(s):  
G. deL. Dear ◽  
K. P. King ◽  
W. C. Gilbert ◽  
D. A. Lubarsky
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document