Reviewing the Evidence on the Effectiveness of Early Childhood Intervention

2011 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Burchinal ◽  
Martha Moorehouse ◽  
C. Cybele Raver ◽  
John Love ◽  
Herbert P. Ginsburg

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulina Brahm ◽  
Alejandra Cortázar ◽  
María Paz Fillol ◽  
María Verónica Mingo ◽  
Constanza Vielma ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Dunst

Findings from three field tests evaluations of early childhood intervention practitioner performance checklists and three parent practice guides are reported. Forty-two practitioners from three early childhood intervention programs reviewed the checklists and practice guides and made (1) social validity judgments of both products, (2) judgments of the compatibility of the checklists and practice guides, and (3) suggestions for improving the intervention products and materials. Results showed that practitioner feedback and suggestions yielded valuable information for improving the products where changes made in response to the practitioners’ social validity ratings and suggestions from the first field test had discernible effects on judgments and feedback of revised products. The importance of striving to develop intervention products and materials that are judged as socially important and acceptable is described.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Carl J. Dunst ◽  
Mary Beth Bruder ◽  
Susan P. Maude ◽  
Melissa Schnurr ◽  
Angela Van Polen ◽  
...  

Findings from research syntheses of adult learning and in-service training studies identified the importance of professional development as a factor influencing practitioner use of recommended and evidence-based intervention practices. These relationships were used to test the hypothesis that practice-specific evidence-based capacity-building professional development would be related to early childhood practitioners’ reported use of recommended early childhood intervention practices. The participants were practitioners working with birth to 3-year-old, 3- to 5-year-old, or birth to 5-year-old children with identified disabilities, developmental delays, or at-risk conditions in home-based or center-based programs or both. The predictors included three practitioner background variables (e.g., years of professional experience) and three professional development variables (e.g., evidence-based professional development practices). Results indicated that the three professional development practice variables accounted for significant amounts of variance in the practitioners’ reported use of 10 different practices beyond that accounted for by the three background variables. The findings highlight the importance of evidence-based capacity-building professional development as a factor influencing practitioners’ judgments of their use of recommended practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document