Profile of the Psychiatric Inpatient Population in a Major Hospital

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Kolb ◽  
E. K. Eric Gunderson ◽  
Patricia Coben
1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Kolb ◽  
E. K. Eric Gunderson ◽  
Patricia Coben

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Alexandre ◽  
Raquel Ribeiro ◽  
Graça Cardoso

Drug Safety ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 919-990
Author(s):  
A Konstantinidis ◽  
U Moser ◽  
R Grohmann ◽  
A Horvath ◽  
R Engel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S307-S308
Author(s):  
S. Madero Gómez ◽  
C. Oliveras-Salvà ◽  
M.T. Pons ◽  
M. Sague ◽  
H. López-Pelayo ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Horen Sheila ◽  
P. Leichner Pierre ◽  
J. Stuart Lawson

Objective This study attempted to estimate the prevalence of dissociative symptoms and disorders in a Canadian adult psychiatric inpatient population and also attempted to determine the extent to which dissociative disorders were recognized by the attending clinical staff. Method All appropriate and consenting adult psychiatric inpatients at the Kingston Psychiatric Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, were given the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Patients scoring 25 or greater were interviewed with the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders. Admission or discharge diagnoses data were used to determine whether or not dissociative disorders were being recognized. Results A total of 48 patients completed the Dissociative Experiences Scale and 14 (29%) scored 25 or greater. The prevalence of dissociative disorders in this hospital population was estimated to be 17%. Dissociative identity disorder was found in six percent, dissociative amnesia in eight percent and dissociative disorder not otherwise specified in two percent of the population. These disorders tended to be under-recognized. Conclusion Research on more extensive populations is required to establish the true prevalence of dissociative symptoms and disorders in psychiatric inpatients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L Baranowski ◽  
Scott B Patten

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of dysgraphia and constructional apraxia for delirium among psychiatric inpatients. Method: Data were collected from 2 sources. First, a series of nondelirious psychiatric inpatients that had participated in a previous study was selected to determine the specificity of various indices of dysgraphia and constructional apraxia. Second, a series of 56 psychiatric inpatients with delirium as identified using electronic administrative data and clinical records was selected to evaluate sensitivity. Results: Of the various indices of dysgraphia examined, only a global rating of writing quality and evidence of jagged or angled letter loops were informative clinical signs. The predictive value of constructional apraxia resembled the predictive value of the 2 dysgraphia indices. Conclusions: Dysgraphia and constructional apraxia are useful clinical signs of delirium in the psychiatric inpatient population. Evaluation of these functions can substantially impact diagnostic decisions where diagnostic uncertainty exists. An evaluation of writing and constructional praxis can be easily incorporated into bedside mental status examinations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document