Religious ritual and implicit social cognition: How posture and prayer elevates conformity and prosociality

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Nocera ◽  
Omar Haque ◽  
Kyle Thomas ◽  
Steven Pinker
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition ◽  
Religious Ritual

Experiencing implicit social cognition

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Nosek
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition

International Employment Discrimination and Implicit Social Cognition: New Directions for Theory and Research

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia T. Chao ◽  
Harold W. Willaby
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Employment Discrimination ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition ◽  
New Directions

Review of Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications.

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-242
Author(s):  
Allison J. Ouimet ◽  
Adam S. Radomsky
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Measurement Theory ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition

Implicit Social Cognition and Mental Representation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Keith Payne ◽  
C. Darryl Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Mental Representation ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition

A Memory Systems Model of Implicit Social Cognition

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Amodio ◽  
Kyle G. Ratner
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Memory Systems ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition ◽  
Systems Model

scholarly journals Implicit Social Cognition

2012 ◽  
pp. 31-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Nosek ◽  
Carlee Beth Hawkins ◽  
Rebecca S. Frazier
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition

scholarly journals The role of recoding in implicit social cognition: Investigating the scope and interpretation of the ReAL model for the implicit association test

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0250068
Author(s):  
Jimmy Calanchini ◽  
Franziska Meissner ◽  
Karl Christoph Klauer
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Tree Model ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Model

The ReAL model is a multinomial processing tree model that quantifies the contribution of three qualitatively distinct processes–recoding, associations, and accuracy–to responses on the implicit association test (IAT), but has only been validated on a modified version of the IAT procedure. The initial goal of the present research was to validate an abbreviated version of the ReAL model (i.e., the Brief ReAL model) on the standard IAT procedure. Two experiments replicated previous validity evidence for the ReAL model on the modified IAT procedure, but did not produce valid parameter estimates for the Brief ReAL model on the standard IAT procedure. A third, pre-registered experiment systematically manipulated all of the task procedures that vary between the standard and modified IAT procedures–response deadline, number of trials, trial constraints–to determine the conditions under which the Brief ReAL model can be validly applied to the IAT. The Brief ReAL model estimated theoretically-interpretable parameters only under a narrow range of IAT conditions, but the ReAL model generally estimated theoretically-interpretable parameters under most IAT conditions. We discuss the application of these findings to implicit social cognition research, and their implications to social cognitive theory.

Can we really understand implicit social cognition from a relational (propositional) perspective?

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Hughes ◽  
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition

A Future History of Implicit Social Cognition and the Law

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Kang ◽  
Kristin Lane
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Social Cognition ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law

scholarly journals Smart Gods, Dumb Gods, and the Role of Social Cognition in Structuring Ritual Intuitions

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Barrett
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Social Cognition ◽  
Religious Activities ◽  
Cognitive Capacities ◽  
Religious Ritual ◽  
Religious Rituals ◽  
Ritual Action ◽  
Religious System ◽  
Within Subjects

AbstractReligious activities of the Pomio Kivung people of Melanesia challenges a specific claim of Lawson & McCauley's (1990) theory of religious ritual, but does it challenge the general claim that religious rituals are underpinned by ordinary cognitive capacities? To further test the hypothesis that ordinary social cognition informs judgments of religious ritual efficacy, 64 American Protestant college students rated the likelihood of success of a number of fictitious rituals. The within-subjects manipulation was the manner in which a successful ritual was modified, either by negating the intentions of the ritual actor or by altering the ritual action. The between-subjects manipulation was the sort of religious system in which the rituals were to be performed: one with an all-knowing god ("Smart god") versus one with a fallible god ("Dumb god"). Participants judged performing the correct action as significantly more important for the success of rituals in the Dumb god condition than in the Smart god condition. In the Smart god condition, performing the correct action was rated significantly less important for the success of the rituals than having appropriate intentions while performing the ritual.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document