How Would You Test This? - Works-in-Progress Forum for Human Factors/Ergonomics Test and Evaluation Initiatives

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Grier ◽  
Karla Eve Allan
1979 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 574-575
Author(s):  
H. McIlvaine Parsons ◽  
Robert C. Williges ◽  
Donald A. Topmiller ◽  
Edward R. Jones ◽  
Hal W. Hendrick ◽  
...  

This symposium will review the technical findings of an Air Force-contractor study that comprehensively examined the needs of human factors engineering in the research, development, test-and-evaluation and operations process for Air Force systems. A nine-month team effort concluded in September 1979 constituted one of the most intensive and extensive inquiries into the human factors field that has been undertaken.


1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Kuhr ◽  
Leonard W. Tobias

Development of satellite communication systems for military use involves human factors engineering in such new areas as digital data handling and computer assistance, besides the well-known areas: function allocation, task analysis, control and display arrangement, workplace layout and personnel subsystem test and evaluation. This paper deals with contributions made during definition, design and verification of the Air Force Satellite Communication System and associated Navy and Army versions. The description of system development provides an up-to-date case study of human factors engineering problems in a military procurement setting. Recommendations are made concerning future system planning.


1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Michael L. Fineberg

The present paper will describe the construction and pilot testing of a human factors evaluation instrument. The instrument was constructed using psychometric procedures generally applied to development of attitude scales. The goal of the instrument was the quantification of operator preference in helicopter design within four major areas of human factors consideration: handling qualities, comfort/discomfort, human engineering design and safety. Each area had a common scale against which 10 specific parameters were evaluated. The ten items within each area were chosen using system operators' expertise, human factors standards, human factors experimental literature and the experience of the authors. The instrument was validated using a sample of 16 aviators during the conduct of an actual operational test. The results of these validation studies indicated a test-retest reliability of .85 (P < .001) and an inter-rater reliability of .93 (P < .001). Use of the instrument did provide statistically significant differences among aircraft candidates under various operational test conditions as measured within each of the four indices within the instrument. It is concluded that the instrument provides an effective method of quantifying the preference of operational aviators. The scrupulous development process using inputs from experienced aviators, experts in aviation field test design, and experts in test construction has provided a high measure of construct validity to the instrument.


1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1146-1148
Author(s):  
Michael L. Frazier ◽  
Bruce H. Taylor

Despite widespread policy support and increasingly sophisticated measurement tools, the evaluation of human factors issues within operational test and evaluation (OT&E) continues to lag behind the evaluation of other system elements. This situation can be traced, in part, to difficulties in integrating human factors findings with system performance measures. The present paper discusses one approach to this problem that is being implemented in the OT&E of the Consolidated Space Operations Center (CSOC).


1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 1306-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A. Storey

This report describes a methodology of simulation research which is designed to accomplish requirements of a human factors engineering simulation, plan. This approach, accompanied by detailed test plans and schedules will fulfill the data item DI-H-7052 (Human Engineering Dynamic Simulation Plan) for intended use of dynamic simulation techniques in support of human engineering analysis, design support and test and evaluation. This methodology will cover the need for dynamic simulation, evaluation techniques, procedures and guidelines, and the behavioral, subjective and physiological methods recommended for use in human engineering evaluations.


1977 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 528-531
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Malone ◽  
Phillip J. Andrews ◽  
Warren Lewis ◽  
James McGuinness

A Navy surface ship represents one of the most complex man-machine systems in existence today. Performance capabilities of personnel required in the propulsion systems, weapon systems, command-control systems, operations systems, supply systems and auxiliary systems should demand that human factors engineering (HFE) receive primary consideration in the design of ships. And yet there is no formal HFE program for ship acquisition. HFE responsibilities are not integrated with each other or with ship systems engineering efforts. There is little or no standardization of HFE methods and data beyond that provided in the design work study approach. Finally, HFE has no formal status within the ship acquisition process. The Navy Sea Systems Command recently moved to correct these problems in implementation of HFE for ships. A ship HFE technology program has been established which has as its primary objectives the integration of available applicable HFE techniques, methods, principles and data into the ship acquisition process. The effort to integrate HFE technology into the ship acquisition process began with a definition of the process itself, with emphasis on the specific events and milestones within the process. The next step entailed identification of HFE requirements appropriate for each event. HFE requirements were described in terms of activities to be completed and products to be provided to the ship design effort. HFE requirements were developed for five major functional areas: manning and training, design for operability, design for maintainability, design for habitability, and test and evaluation. After identification of HFE requirements in each of these areas, determinations were made of the degree to which available HFE technologies were appropriate to satisfy the requirements. HFE technologies consisted of HFE principles, data, methods and techniques which have been reported in the HFE literature. These technology assessments represented the best estimates of the research team concerning the applicability of available technologies for specific HFE requirements.


1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 584-588
Author(s):  
D. Todd Jones

During the past two (2) years the U. S. Coast Guard's Office of Research and Development has conducted numerous operational evaluations of “advanced marine vessels” (AMV). Among these are: Small Wetted Area Twin Hull (SWATH); Hydrofoil; and Surface Effect Ships (SES). This paper outlines the broad-based human factors RDT&E effort to support Coast Guard AMV test and evaluation needs to: Improve existing AMV vessel designs and vessel systems through Human Factors Engineered systems designs, Examine and assess AMV concepts and key subsystems to determine man/ machine problems and possible solutions, Develop, if necessary, new capabilities to monitor, control, and correct Human Factors Engineering problems uncovered during further AMV tests and evaluations, and Test and evaluate new and existing AMVs and technology systems and subsystems to determine their impact on the man/ machine interface. The generation and distribution of new and available HFE technical data to the AMV T&E team (and vessel designers/ users) as necessary, aid to the AMV T&E team (and the user) in the integration of HFE technology to the AMV end product represent key deliverables of this research effort. This research does not address a single marine vehicle, system concept, or Coast Guard program, but is structured to provide the framework for identifying, developing, assessing, and disseminating human factors technology in support of the AMV test and evaluation program. Current research efforts and results will be discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document