Determinants of Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Dependence

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Murphy ◽  
Paul A. Fishman ◽  
Sterling M. McPherson ◽  
Dennis G. Dyck ◽  
John M. Roll
1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolley E. Johnson ◽  
Thomas Eissenberg ◽  
Maxine L. Stitzer ◽  
Eric C. Strain ◽  
Ira A. Liebson ◽  
...  

Life Sciences ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 54 (17) ◽  
pp. 1215-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Amass ◽  
Warren K. Bickel ◽  
Stephen T. Higgins ◽  
Gary J. Badger

2021 ◽  
Vol 278 ◽  
pp. 563-569
Author(s):  
Jeffrey F. Scherrer ◽  
Joanne Salas ◽  
Richard Grucza ◽  
Mark D. Sullivan ◽  
Patrick J. Lustman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Jesús Ruíz Ruíz ◽  
José María Martínez Delgado ◽  
Nuria García ◽  
Bartolomé Baena

Abstract Objective Methadone and buprenorphine are the most prevalent types of opioid maintenance programs in Andalusia. The main objective is comparing the functional and health status of patients with pharmacological opioid maintenance treatments according to different socio-demographic characteristic, disabilities and sexual functioning difficulties. Methods A total of 593 patients from the Andalusia community, 329 were undergoing methadone treatment and 264 were undergoing buprenorphine treatment. The patients were interviewed by socio-demographic and opioid-related variables, assessed by functional disability and health variables ( WHODAS 2.0. ) and for sexual dysfunction ( PRSexDQ-SALSEX ). Results We found significant differences in the socio-demographic and the opioid-related variables as the onset of opioid use, being on previous maintenance programs, opioid intravenous use, the length of previous maintenance programs, polydrug use and elevated seroprevalence rates (HCV and HIV) between the methadone group and the buprenorphine group. There were differences in the Understanding and communication domain, Getting around domain, Participation in society domain and in the WHODAS 2.0. simple and complex score, favoring buprenorphine-treated patients. The methadone group had elevated sexual dysfunction than the buprenorphine group. Opioid-related variables as seroprevalence rates, other previous lifetime maintenance program, the daily opioid dosage and the daily alcohol use are the most discriminative variables between both groups. Participation in society variables and sexual problems were the most important clinical variables in distinguishing the methadone group from the buprenorphine group. Conclusions The methadone group showed higher prevalence in opioid dependence-related variables, elevated disabilities in participation in society activities and sexual problems compared with the buprenorphine group.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Murphy ◽  
Paul A. Fishman ◽  
Sterling McPherson ◽  
Dennis G. Dyck ◽  
John R. Roll

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1177-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis W. Raisch ◽  
Heather M. Campbell ◽  
David A. Garnand ◽  
Mark A. Jones ◽  
Mike R. Sather ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 2136-2143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S Goodwin ◽  
Diana G Wilkins ◽  
Olga Averin ◽  
Robin E Choo ◽  
Jennifer R Schroeder ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Buprenorphine is under investigation as a pharmacotherapeutic agent for treating opioid dependence in pregnant women. We hypothesized that there would be a relationship between the cumulative maternal dose of buprenorphine during pregnancy and the concentration of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in maternal and infant hair. Methods: This study examined buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations in hair obtained from 9 buprenorphine-maintained pregnant women and 4 of their infants. Specimens were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with limits of quantification of 3.0 pg/mg. All maternal hair specimens were washed with methylene chloride before analysis, and when sufficient amounts of maternal hair were available, specimens also were analyzed without washing. Infant hair specimens were not washed. Results: Buprenorphine concentrations were significantly greater in unwashed hair than washed hair (P = 0.031). Norbuprenorphine concentrations were significantly greater than buprenorphine concentrations in both maternal (P = 0.0097) and infant hair (P = 0.0033). There were statistically significant associations between the cumulative maternal dose of buprenorphine administered and the concentrations of buprenorphine (washed, P <0.0001; unwashed, P = 0.0004), norbuprenorphine (washed, P <0.0001; unwashed, P = 0.0005), and buprenorphine plus norbuprenorphine (washed, P <0.0001; unwashed, P = 0.0005) for both washed and unwashed maternal hair specimens. There was a significant positive association between concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in maternal hair (washed, P <0.0001; unwashed, P = 0.0003), a trend for this association in infant hair (P = 0.08), and an association between buprenorphine concentrations in maternal unwashed hair and infant hair (P = 0.0002). The buprenorphine:norbuprenorphine ratio increased in distal segments. Conclusion: Buprenorphine treatment during gestation provides an opportunity for monitoring drug disposition in maternal and fetal tissues under controlled conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document