Brain activation in response to facial signals of dominance and submission: The role of implicit power motivation

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Wirth ◽  
Steven J. Stanton ◽  
Christian E. Waugh ◽  
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz ◽  
Oliver C. Schultheiss
2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver C. Schultheiss ◽  
Michelle M. Wirth ◽  
Christian E. Waugh ◽  
Steven J. Stanton ◽  
Elizabeth A. Meier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paola Pinti ◽  
Andrea Devoto ◽  
Isobel Greenhalgh ◽  
Ilias Tachtsidis ◽  
Paul W Burgess ◽  
...  

Abstract Anterior prefrontal cortex (PFC, Brodmann area 10) activations are often, but not always, found in neuroimaging studies investigating deception, and the precise role of this area remains unclear. To explore the role of the PFC in face-to-face deception, we invited pairs of participants to play a card game involving lying and lie detection while we used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to record brain activity in the PFC. Participants could win points for successfully lying about the value of their cards or for detecting lies. We contrasted patterns of brain activation when the participants either told the truth or lied, when they were either forced into this or did so voluntarily and when they either succeeded or failed to detect a lie. Activation in the anterior PFC was found in both lie production and detection, unrelated to reward. Analysis of cross-brain activation patterns between participants identified areas of the PFC where the lead player’s brain activity synchronized their partner’s later brain activity. These results suggest that during situations that involve close interpersonal interaction, the anterior PFC supports processing widely involved in deception, possibly relating to the demands of monitoring one’s own and other people’s behaviour.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 247054701882149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Braeden A. Terpou ◽  
Maria Densmore ◽  
Janine Thome ◽  
Paul Frewen ◽  
Margaret C. McKinnon ◽  
...  

Background The innate alarm system, a network of interconnected midbrain, other brainstem, and thalamic structures, serves to rapidly detect stimuli in the environment prior to the onset of conscious awareness. This system is sensitive to threatening stimuli and has evolved to process these stimuli subliminally for hastened responding. Despite the conscious unawareness, the presentation of subliminal threat stimuli generates increased activation of limbic structures, including the amygdala and insula, as well as emotionally evaluative structures, including the cerebellum and orbitofrontal cortex. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with an increased startle response and decreased extinction learning to conditioned threat. The role of the innate alarm system in the clinical presentation of PTSD, however, remains poorly understood. Methods Here, we compare midbrain, brainstem, and cerebellar activation in persons with PTSD (n = 26) and matched controls (n = 20) during subliminal threat presentation. Subjects were presented with masked trauma-related and neutral stimuli below conscious threshold. Contrasts of subliminal brain activation for the presentation of neutral stimuli were subtracted from trauma-related brain activation. Group differences in activation, as well as correlations between clinical scores and PTSD activation, were examined. Imaging data were preprocessed utilizing the spatially unbiased infratentorial template toolbox within SPM12. Results Analyses revealed increased midbrain activation in PTSD as compared to controls in the superior colliculus, periaqueductal gray, and midbrain reticular formation during subliminal threat as compared to neutral stimulus presentation. Controls showed increased activation in the right cerebellar lobule V during subliminal threat presentation as compared to PTSD. Finally, a negative correlation emerged between PTSD patient scores on the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory for the Depersonalization/Derealization subscale and activation in the right lobule V of the cerebellum during the presentation of subliminal threat as compared to neutral stimuli. Conclusion We interpret these findings as evidence of innate alarm system overactivation in PTSD and of the prominent role of the cerebellum in the undermodulation of emotion observed in PTSD.


1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver C. Schultheiss ◽  
Kenneth L. Campbell ◽  
David C. McClelland

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 3406-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erina Hara ◽  
Lubica Kubikova ◽  
Neal A. Hessler ◽  
Erich D. Jarvis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document