Hypermnesia occurs in both free recall and cued recall tests

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Payne ◽  
Jeffrey S. Anastasi
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 278-285
Author(s):  
Takashi Yamagishi ◽  
Takuya Sato ◽  
Atsushi Sato ◽  
Toru Imamura

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Laumann ◽  
Rogers Elliott

This study examined age-related differences in the reporting of a filmed domestic scene, in which a mother was either ambiguously caring or ambiguously abusive toward her daughter. Three age groups were used (3- to 4-yr.-old, 6- to 7-yr.-old, and adult), and three modes of questioning were used (free recall, short-answer cued-recall, and leading questions either consistent or inconsistent with what was observed). There were 119 subjects in all: 39 3- to 4-yr.-olds, 39 6- to 7-yr.-olds, and 41 adults. Developmental trends were found in the subjects' ability to answer free-recall questions and cued-recall questions. Although 6- to 7-yr.-olds were significantly lower than adults in their accuracy scores on the cued-recall questions, they were still highly accurate. There were also significant age-related differences in the subjects' suggestibility, with the 3- to 4-yr.-olds being relatively suggestible, the 6- to 7-yr.-olds less so, and the adults virtually unsuggestible. When the leading questions that concerned the central theme of the film (i.e., Was the mother abusive or not?) were isolated, however, no significant age-related differences in suggestibility were found.


1988 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Cornoldi ◽  
Adele Cavedon ◽  
Rossana De Beni ◽  
Alvaro Pra Baldi

In the literature, a memory advantage for bizarre items over common ones has been found only in a few studies, especially with materials prepared ad hoc by the experimenter and with free recall rather than cued recall tests. These results contrast with the widespread conviction that bizarreness helps recall. The present paper explores the role of some variables involved in the “bizarreness” effect: (1) It examines the typical self-generation procedure in which the subject is asked to create an interaction between a pair of nouns, as well as the case in which only one noun is given. Higher freedom in generating sentences appears to correspond to higher free recall of bizarre items. (2) It is shown that bizarre items must be distinguished from “unusual” ones, which have different effects on memory. (3) By contrasting groups instructed to use either imagery or verbal elaboration, it is shown that the bizarreness effect is linked to the use of imagery. Instructions to use imagery without the possibility of creating bizarre representations do not improve the recall of common items. (4) The classification of parts of sentences generated reveals that, under common instructions, one subject's choice of verb and noun is more likely to be shared by other subjects. This fact may explain the different effects found by previous research in cued and free recall. (5) The overestimation of the recallability of bizarre items appears less evident than in previous research, probably because subjects had direct experience of the difficulties met in generating bizarre images.


1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Grober ◽  
Rosanne M. Leipzig ◽  
Richard B. Lipton ◽  
Wendy Wisniewski ◽  
Mary Schroeder ◽  
...  

Enhanced cued recall, a procedure which circumvents inattention and induces semantic processing, was used to determine if scopolamine produces direct impairment of specific memory mechanisms or indirect impairment of memory secondary to impairment of other cognitive processes. In two studies, cognitively normal young adults given moderate or high doses of scopolamine maintained maximum cued recall in spite of a dose-dependent decrement in free recall. This finding suggests that cholinergic blockade may impair memory indirectly through effects on other cognitive processes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1103-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Coluccia ◽  
Nadia Gamboz ◽  
Maria A. Brandimonte

1987 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Richard Hanley ◽  
Peter Morris

Johnson-Laird, Gibbs and de Mowbray (1978) and Ross (1981) have argued that amount of processing, as indexed by the overall number of decisions a subject makes, provides a good predictor of incidental memory performance. Conversely, McClelland, Rawles and Sinclair (1981) have provided evidence that it is normally the number of positive decisions rather than the overall number of decisions per se that determines level of recall. The present study replicated and extended the findings of McClelland and his colleagues. In free recall (Experiment 1 and 3), cued recall (Experiment 3) and recognition in the presence or absence of context cues (Experiments 2 and 3), an account based on number of positive decisions provided by far the better explanation. Experiment 3 also revealed that the experimental manipulations had a somewhat greater effect on recall than recognition. This is explained in terms of Tulving and Pearlstone's (1966) distinction between availability and accessibility. It is suggested that words associated with negative decisions are not only less accessible in memory, there are also fewer of them available for recall and recognition.


2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-304
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Toyota

Two experiments compared the effectiveness of three types of elaboration on incidental and intentional memory for a story: self-generated, self-choice, and experimenter-provided elaboration. In Exp. 1, using the incidental memory paradigm, second graders listened to a fantastic story and then, in the self-generated condition, answered a “why” question about a particular topic in the story. In the self-choice condition, they chose one of the alternative answers to the question and in the experimenter-provided condition, judged the appropriateness of each of two provided answers. This was followed by free-recall and cued-recall tests. Subjects were categorized into two groups, good and poor academic achievers in terms of academic scores in four subject matter areas. For good academic achievers, self-choice elaboration led to a better cued recall than the other two elaboration types. The cued-recall performance of poor achievers was not different with the three conditions. In Exp. 2, using the intentional memory paradigm, the subjects intended to learn a different story and then performed the same procedure as Exp. 1. For poor achievers, self-choice elaboration led to a worse free recall than the other elaboration types, but the free recall of good achievers was not significantly different for the three types of elaboration. The results were interpreted as showing that the effects of self-choice elaboration on incidental and intentional memory were correlated with subjects' academic performance.


2007 ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Monaghan ◽  
Alex Blaszczynski

This study compared differences in rates of free and cued recall for messages displayed on electronic gaming machines (EGMs) delivered in one of two display modes: static or dynamic. Rates of recall were investigated in a laboratory setting using 92 university students (75.0% female) with a mean age of 19.3 years (SD = 2.4 years). The static mode consisted of a fixed government-mandated message placed on the frame of an EGM directly next to the gaming buttons. In the dynamic mode, an identical message was presented in the form of a translucent display scrolling across the screen during play. Results showed that significantly more of the information presented in dynamic mode was recalled, and with greater accuracy, in both free recall and cued recall conditions compared with static government-mandated messages. It was concluded that the method of displaying signs influences awareness and recall of harm minimization messages.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. e1312-e1321
Author(s):  
Edmarie Guzmán-Vélez ◽  
Jairo Martínez ◽  
Kate Papp ◽  
Ana Baena ◽  
Clara Vila-Castelar ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine whether performance on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) is associated with PET in vivo markers of brain pathology and whether it can distinguish those who will develop dementia later in life due to autosomal-dominant Alzheimer disease (AD) from age-matched controls.MethodsTwenty-four cognitively unimpaired Presenilin-1 E280A carriers (mean age 36 years) and 28 noncarriers (mean age 37 years) underwent Pittsburg compound B-PET (amyloid), flortaucipir-PET (tau), and cognitive testing, including the FCSRT (immediate and delayed free and cued recall scores). Linear regressions were used to examine the relationships among FCSRT scores, age, mean cortical amyloid, and regional tau burden.ResultsFree and total recall scores did not differ between cognitively unimpaired mutation carriers and noncarriers. Greater age predicted lower free recall and delayed free and total recall scores in carriers. In cognitively impaired carriers, delayed free recall predicted greater amyloid burden and entorhinal tau, while worse immediate free recall scores predicted greater tau in the inferior temporal and entorhinal cortices. In turn, in all carriers, lower free and total recall scores predicted greater amyloid and regional tau pathology.ConclusionsFCSRT scores were associated with in vivo markers of AD–related pathology in cognitively unimpaired individuals genetically determined to develop dementia. Difficulties on free recall, particularly delayed recall, were evident earlier in the disease trajectory, while difficulties on cued recall were seen only as carriers neared the onset of dementia, consistent with the pathologic progression of the disease. Findings suggest that the FCSRT can be a useful measure to track disease progression in AD.


1993 ◽  
Vol 77 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1235-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruo Kikuno

This study was conducted to examine the memory for coins of 7-yr.-old children and junior college students. Subjects in the free-recall group were asked to draw a coin from memory. Those in the cued-recall group used another coin as a retrieval cue to draw a coin. Analysis showed that students recalled significantly more distinctive features than children, but there were no significant differences on common and covariant features recalled by students and children. These results suggest that adults have elaborated schemata with more distinctive features for coins than do children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document