Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments.

1967 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert C. Kelman
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jilles Heringa ◽  
Joseph Dute

Abstract The Commission has proposed a regulation ‘on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use’ to introduce one regulatory framework for clinical trials in the European Union. This regulation should replace the current clinical trials directive (2001/20/EC). In this article we describe and critically review the main provisions of the proposed regulation. We assess the consequences for a sound authorisation procedure of clinical trials and the level of protection for human subjects. We note that the proposed regulation is inconsistent with applicable international legal documents, such as the Biomedicine Convention and the Declaration of Helsinki. We conclude that the proposed regulation does not ensure a “high level of human health protection” — required by its legal basis in the TFEU — because it may force Member States concerned to accept a reporting Member States’ approval of — in their estimation — an unethical clinical trial.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 1091-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor D. Quintanilla ◽  
Rachel A. Allen ◽  
Edward R. Hirt

When claimants press their claims without counsel, they fail at virtually every stage of civil litigation and overwhelmingly fail to obtain meaningful access to justice. This research program harnesses psychological science to experimentally test a novel hypothesis: mainly, a claimant's pro se status itself sends a signal that biases decision making about the claimant and her claim. We conducted social psychological experiments with the public (N = 157), law students (N = 198), and employment discrimination lawyers (N = 39), holding the quality and merit of a Title VII sex discrimination case constant. In so doing, we examined whether a claimant's pro se status itself shapes stereotypes held about the claimant and biases decision making about settlement awards. These experiments reveal that pro se status influences stereotypes of claimants and settlement awards received. Moreover, the signaling effect of pro se status is exacerbated by socialization in the legal profession. Among law-trained individuals (i.e., law students and lawyers), a claimant's pro se status generates negative stereotypes about the claimant and these negative stereotypes explain the adverse effect of pro se status on decision making about settlement awards.


2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Radford ◽  
Andy Pilny ◽  
Ashley Reichelmann ◽  
Brian Keegan ◽  
Brooke Foucault Welles ◽  
...  

Experimental research in traditional laboratories comes at a significant logistic and financial cost while drawing data from demographically narrow populations. The growth of online methods of research has resulted in effective means for social psychologists to collect large-scale survey-based data in a cost-effective and timely manner. However, the same advancement has not occurred for social psychologists who rely on experimentation as their primary method of data collection. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of one online laboratory for conducting experiments, Volunteer Science, and report the results of six studies that test canonical behaviors commonly captured in social psychological experiments. Our results show that the online laboratory is capable of performing a variety of studies with large numbers of diverse volunteers. We advocate for the use of the online laboratory as a valid and cost-effective way to perform social psychological experiments with large numbers of diverse subjects.


Author(s):  
Tünde Sipos

A tanulmány a rapport (összhang) jelenségét járja körül, bemutatva, hogyan, milyen feltételek mellett épül ki természetes módon, milyen előnyöket jelentett az evolúció folyamán, és milyen hasznot jelenthet napjainkban a tárgyalások során a partnerek számára. Rámutat arra is, hogy az összhang „mesterséges úton” is létrehozható, az interakciós partner viselkedésének tudatos utánzása által. A tudatos utánzás során az összhang valamennyi előnye megmarad a felek számára, és az utánzó fél úgy jut többletnyereséghez, hogy partnere nyereségét is növeli. A tanulmány elsősorban olyan szociálpszichológiai kísérleteket mutat be, amelyek tárgyalási szituációkra épülnek, és amelyekből hasznos gyakorlati következtetések vonhatók le a mindennapi tárgyalásokra vonatkozóan. ________ The benefit of the strategic behavioral mimicry on the efficiency of the negotiation. The paper focuses on the phenomenon of „rapport”, examining how and under what conditions it developes in a natural way, what benefits it had during the course of human evolution and what advantages it can hold nowadays for negotiating parties. The paper also points out that rapport can be established in an „artificial way”, by conscious imitation the behavior of interaction partners. During this conscious behavioral mimicry, all benefits of the rapport are reserved for the parties where the mimicking party gains extra benefits while increasing the benefits of the other party as well. The study presents certain social psychological experiments built around bargaining situations where useful practical conclusions can be drawn for everyday negotiating practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document