Champion's Health Belief Model Scale--Indonesian Version

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Triana Kesuma Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Model Scale ◽  
Belief Model

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Romanian Version of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale for Breast Self-examination

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adelina Mihaela Stefanut ◽  
Mona Vintilă ◽  
Paul Sârbescu
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Criterion Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Breast Self Examination ◽  
Model Scale ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Self Examination

Abstract Background: This study set out to translate Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale and to test its properties on a Romanian sample. Methods: The study included 502 participants. The structural validity, convergent validity, criterion validity and reliability were evaluated for the Romanian version. Results: The exploratory factor analysis highlighted six factors. The confirmatory factor analysis upheld the correctness of the six-subscale model as presenting a good fit for the 34-item version. Convergent validity was supported by the fact that the constructs included in the model correlated significantly with similar constructs evaluated using other questionnaires. In terms of criterion validity, those women who perceived fewer barriers and more cues to action and had greater self-efficacy practiced more frequent breast self-examination. α Cronbach coefficients ranged between 0.74 and 0.87 and test-retest correlation coefficients for the six subscales fell between 0.47 and 0.69. Conclusions: The Romanian version of the Champion Health Belief Model Scale is valid and reliable tool.

scholarly journals Evidências de Validade da Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale para o Brasil

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Brasil Moreira ◽  
Ana Fátima Carvalho Fernandes ◽  
Victoria Champion ◽  
Virginia Susan Dahinten ◽  
Vanessa da Silva Carvalho Vila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Model Scale ◽  
Belief Model

Health Belief Model Scale--Colorectal Cancer Screening

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin-Young Lee ◽  
Eunice E. Lee ◽  
Young Sun Rhee ◽  
Eun Young Yang ◽  
Jeong Ha Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Model Scale ◽  
Belief Model

scholarly journals Adaptation and validation of the health belief model scale for colorectal cancer screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-363
Author(s):  
Shin‐Young Lee ◽  
Eunice E. Lee ◽  
Young Sun Rhee ◽  
Eun Young Yang ◽  
Jeong Ha Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Model Scale ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
The Health Belief Model

scholarly journals Maltese Translation and Adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for Breast Screening Among Maltese Women

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danika Marmarà ◽  
Vincent Marmarà ◽  
Gill Hubbard
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Breast Screening ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Illness Perception ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Process Step ◽  
Model Scale ◽  
Illness Perception Questionnaire ◽  
Belief Model

Background and Purpose: Translating, adapting, and piloting Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS) and Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) among Maltese women. Methods: The Maltese questionnaire (Maltese Breast Screening Questionnaire [MBSQ]) was developed through 9 steps. Bilingual women (n = 15) completed MBSQ at 2 time points. Results: During forward-backward translations (Steps 1–4), 4 English controversial terms were raised. Twelve experts agreed on terminologies during adaptation process (Step 5). Following face validity (n = 6; Step 6), 3 items were deleted. Following reconciliation (Step 7) and proofreading (Step 8), MBSQ consisted of 121 items. Pilot testing (Step 9) showed positive correlation (CHBMS-MS = .87, IPQ-R = .85; p < .001); high Cronbach’s alpha (CHBMS-MS = .93, IPQ-R = .92); overall acceptable internal consistency (CHBMS-MS = .69–.83, IPQ-R = .75–.93); and acceptable test–retest reliability correlations: CHBMS-MS (Maltese = .62–.76; English = .61–.84), IPQ-R (Maltese = .63–.82; English = .61–.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Maltese and English scale items demonstrated high reliability and validity preliminary values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document