Social goal orientation differentially influences exposure to interpersonal and noninterpersonal trauma.

Author(s):  
Rachael Shaw ◽  
Craig R. Colder ◽  
Jennifer P. Read
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie S. Churchyard ◽  
Karen J. Pine ◽  
Shivani Sharma ◽  
Ben (C) Fletcher

Abstract. Diary studies of personality have shown that personality is variable, and can help the person deal appropriately with the different interpersonal demands they encounter. This study aims to demonstrate how interpersonal context predicts personality states. Thirty-six participants (9 male, 27 female, Mage = 24.72, SD = 7.11) kept an online diary for one month. The diary recorded measurements of HEXACO personality states, momentary interpersonal factors including current interpersonal role (with friend, family member, partner, as employee/student, alone), and social goal orientation (socializing with others, avoidance of others, asserting yourself, personal/work achievement), and dispositional anxiety and depression. Individuals’ personality states were found to vary considerably across measurements in a normal distribution. Multilevel modelling analyses showed that interpersonal factors did predict within subject personality variation. Social goal orientations had a greater relative impact than interpersonal roles. Depression had a significant effect on between subject variance in state emotionality. These findings highlight the importance of interpersonal context in predicting stable personality variation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 1518-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen D. Rudolph ◽  
Jamie L. Abaied ◽  
Megan Flynn ◽  
Niwako Sugimura ◽  
Anna Monica Agoston

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adar Ben-Eliyahu ◽  
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia ◽  
Martha Putallaz

The relations of academic and social goal orientations to academic and social behaviors and self-concept were investigated among academically talented adolescents ( N = 1,218) attending a mastery-oriented academic residential summer program. Results supported context effects in that academic mastery goal orientations predicted academic (in-class engagement, scholastic self-concept) and general outcomes (global self-worth self-concept) more than any other goal orientation. There were also gender differences such that academic mastery goal orientations predicted course performance and responsible classroom behavior only for girls, whereas for boys, academic mastery goal orientations were positively related to close friendship self-concept. The relation of social goal orientations to social outcomes also varied by gender. For instance, social development goal orientations were uniquely associated with social self-concept for girls, whereas there were some unique patterns regarding social demonstration-avoidance goal orientations for boys. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 9886
Author(s):  
Kwangho Lee ◽  
Hae-Deok Song

The purpose of this study is to identify the structural relationships among social goal orientation, knowledge sharing, employee engagement and innovative behavior on employees of an organization. This study used a data sample of office workers in Korean companies by survey. The findings are as follows. First, knowledge sharing plays a significant role in the relationship between social goal orientation type and innovative behavior. Second, employee engagement plays a mediating role between social goal orientation and innovative behavior. Third, the dual mediating effect of knowledge sharing and employee engagement is important between social goal orientation and innovative behavior. Our findings have important theoretical implications, which suggest that not only psychological motivations of individuals but also their social motivations should be considered to promote innovative behavior. Therefore, it is important to provide an appropriate knowledge sharing and employee engagement environment for employees according to their social goal orientation type rather than requiring innovative behavior.


2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1116-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis M. Wilson ◽  
Philip C. Rodkin ◽  
Allison M. Ryan

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren C. K. Chiu ◽  
Humphrey Leung ◽  
Kaylee Kong ◽  
Cynthia Lee

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton V. Cahoon ◽  
Aaron Watson ◽  
Jack P. Olin ◽  
Eric A. Surface

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document