Social decision-making following interpersonal transgressions: Word to the wise.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikan Eghbali ◽  
C. Ward Struthers ◽  
Joshua R. Guilfoyle
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Interpersonal Transgressions ◽  
Social Decision Making

Formal Models of Dilemmas in Social Decision-making

1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn M. Dawes
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Formal Models ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Social Decision Making

Less Power or Powerless? Egocentric Empathy Gaps and the Irony of Having Little vs. No Power in Social Decision Making

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Handgraaf ◽  
Eric van Dijk ◽  
Riël C. Vermunt ◽  
Henk Wilke ◽  
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Social Decision Making

scholarly journals Social Value Orientation Modulates Fairness Processing During Social Decision-Making: Evidence From Behavior and Brain Potentials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmu Hu ◽  
Xiaoqin Mai
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Frontal Negativity ◽  
Social Decision Making

Abstract Social value orientation (SVO) characterizes stable individual differences by an inherent sense of fairness in outcome allocations. Using the event-related potential (ERP), this study investigated differences in fairness decision-making behavior and neural bases between individuals with prosocial and proself orientations using the Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral results indicated that prosocials were more prone to rejecting unfair offers with stronger negative emotional reactions compared with proselfs. ERP results revealed that prosocials showed a larger P2 when receiving fair offers than unfair ones in a very early processing stage, whereas such effect was absent in proselfs. In later processing stages, although both groups were sensitive to fairness as reflected by an enhanced medial frontal negativity (MFN) for unfair offers and a larger P3 for fair offers, prosocials exhibited a stronger fairness effect on these ERP components relative to proselfs. Furthermore, the fairness effect on the MFN mediated the SVO effect on rejecting unfair offers. Findings regarding emotional experiences, behavioral patterns, and ERPs provide compelling evidence that SVO modulates fairness processing in social decision-making, whereas differences in neural responses to unfair vs. fair offers as evidenced by the MFN appear to play important roles in the SVO effect on behavioral responses to unfairness.

Information processing and age differences in social decision-making.

1986 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-chen Chao ◽  
George P. Knight ◽  
Alan F. Dubro
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Social Decision Making

scholarly journals The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in social decision-making

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 3072-3085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Bitsch ◽  
Philipp Berger ◽  
Arne Nagels ◽  
Irina Falkenberg ◽  
Benjamin Straube
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
The Right ◽  
Social Decision Making

Equipping with Mature Moral Judgment (Social Decision Making)

2015 ◽  
pp. 235-270
Author(s):  
Granville Bud Potter ◽  
John C. Gibbs ◽  
Molly Robbins ◽  
Peter E. Langdon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Social Decision Making
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document