Mantle Cell Lymphoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract in a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 111 (7) ◽  
pp. 922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Homayoun Shojamanesh ◽  
Frank Melgoza
2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bal Kampalath ◽  
Nashwa Abed ◽  
Christopher R Chitambar ◽  
Peter vanTuinen ◽  
Gargi Chakrabarty ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S1422-S1423
Author(s):  
Barrett Attarha ◽  
Satish Maharaj ◽  
Ciel Harris ◽  
Ron Schey ◽  
Ammar Nassri ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-148
Author(s):  
Hugh James Freeman

A74-year-old male with a history of a tonsillar lymphoma developed diarrhea. Investigations led to detection of extensive intestinal lymphomatous polyposis (mantle cell lymphoma). After an aggressive clinical course with associated nodal and peripheral blood involvement, death followed within three months. Postmortem studies revealed widespread dissemination within the entire gastrointestinal tract, including the esophagus, stomach, and small and large intestines. Although this type of lymphoma is rare and accounts for only about 1% to 8% of all forms of primary B cell gastrointestinal lymphomas in North America, separation from other subtypes has become more important because of reported responses of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphomas to antibiotics aimed atHelicobacter pylorieradication.


Author(s):  
Patrícia Colombo Corrêa ◽  
Íris Mattos Santos-Pirath ◽  
Chandra Chiappin Cardoso ◽  
Camila Mattiolo ◽  
Bruno Vieira Dias ◽  
...  

Aims: We report a rare case of therapy-related AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) that occurred after treatment for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Presentation of Case: A 52 years-old male patient was diagnosed with MCL in leukemic phase. The treatment consisted in R-CHOP rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone, then patient experienced remission. Three months later, he presented a lump that was diagnosed as OSCC, which was surgically removed and treated with cisplatin and radiotherapy. Then, the patient’s hemogram presented 35.0% of blasts and, after morphologic, phenotypic and molecular analysis, it was classified as AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1). However, due to the previous historic of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the final diagnosis was t-AML. Discussion: The correct diagnosis of therapy related malignancies is important due to its severity as they are very aggressive and, usually, considered incurable. t-AMLs with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) is considered as favorable karyotype, still, it has a poorer outcome compared with its de novo counterpart. Conclusion: t-AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) is rare and few cases are described in the literature. More reports are necessary to better elucidate the mechanisms involved in this disease to define better treatment strategies to prevent these events and to improve the poor outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document