scholarly journals Phase II randomised proof-of-concept study of the urokinase inhibitor upamostat (WX-671) in combination with gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with non-resectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 766-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Heinemann ◽  
M P Ebert ◽  
R P Laubender ◽  
P Bevan ◽  
C Mala ◽  
...  
Pancreatology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. S88-S89
Author(s):  
Nelide De Lio ◽  
Enrico Vasile ◽  
Mario Antonio Belluomini ◽  
Francesca Costa ◽  
Carla Cappelli ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4017-4017
Author(s):  
Masato Ozaka ◽  
Makoto Ueno ◽  
Hiroshi Ishii ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Hiroshi Katayama ◽  
...  

4017 Background: FOLFIRINOX, consisting of leucovorin (LV), fluorouracil (FU), irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), and GnP, consisting of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nPTX), have shown superior efficacy over GEM in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Although several studies have reported the efficacy of FOLFIRINOX or GnP for pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), no randomized controlled trial to compare the two regimens has been conducted in those pts. To select the most promising chemotherapy for LAPC, a randomized phase II selection design trial (JCOG1407) was conducted to compare between modified FOLFIRINOX (FOLFIRINOX with dose reduction of IRI and without bolus FU; Arm A) and GnP (Arm B) for pts with LAPC. Methods: In Arm A, 85 mg/m2 of L-OHP, 200 mg/m2 of l-LV, 150 mg/m2 of IRI, followed by 2,400 mg/m2 of continuous FU over 46 hours are infused every 2 weeks. In Arm B, 125 mg/m2 of nPTX followed by 1,000 mg/m2 of GEM are infused on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (the proportion of 1-year OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) and response rate in pts with target lesions. The planned sample size was 124 pts to select more effective regimen in 1-year OS with a probability of at least 0.85 and to test the null hypothesis of 53% in 1-year OS with a one-sided alpha of 5% and 80% Results: From 2015 to 2019, a total of 126 pts was enrolled from 29 Japanese institutions, and were allocated to Arm A (n = 62) or Arm B (n = 64). The median (range) age was 66 (44-75) years and 58.7% were male. At the analysis, after a median (range) follow-up of 1.52 (0.55-3.99) years, 75 (59.5%) pts died. The proportion of 1-year OS was better in Arm B, 77.4% [95% CI 64.9–86.0] vs. 82.5% [95% CI 70.7–89.9], but 2-year OS was better in Arm A, 48.2% [95% CI 33.3–61.7] vs. 39.7% [95% CI 28.6–52.5]. Median OS was 2.0 years [95% CI 1.6-2.7] in Arm A and 1.8 years [95% CI 1.5-2.0] in Arm B. 1-year PFS for Arm A/B was 47.5 % [95% CI 34.5-59.4]/40.2% [95% CI 27.8-52.3], and 1-year MFS was 64.2 % [95% CI 50.9-74.8]/57.3% [95% CI 43.9-68.6]. Arm A was better OS in pts with CA19-9 <1000 U/mL and the opposite trend was observed in pts with CA19-9>1000 U/mL. Response rate was 30.9% [95% CI 19.1-44.8] in Arm A, and 41.4% [95% CI 28.6-55.1]) in Arm B. Incidences of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities for Arm A and Arm B were 66.1% and 67.2%, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: This study was the first randomized trial comparing the two regimens. The 1-year OS of the primary endpoint in GnP was better than mFOLFIRINOX, but mFOLFIRINOX achieved longer survival in 2-year OS. It is required to confirm longer OS and safety profiles which regimen should be selected as a standard regimen in LAPC. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180085.


1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. TH. Wagener ◽  
Q. G. C. M. van Hoesel ◽  
S. H. Yap ◽  
W. J. Hoogenraad ◽  
Th. Wobbes ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4100-4100 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Krempien ◽  
M. W. Münter ◽  
C. Timke ◽  
P. E. Huber ◽  
H. Friess ◽  
...  

4100 Background: The induction of EGFR targeting with cetuximab in radiation based therapy of solid tumors has yielded promising results. Thus, we initiated a prospective Phase II trial designed to analyze the feasibility and effectivity of trimodal therapy with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and cetuximab in locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer. Methods: In this phase 2 study, pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer without prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with radiotherapy (RT), gemcitabine weekly (300 mg/m2), and cetuximab weekly (loading dose 400 mg/m2 day 1, and concomitant with radiation day 8,15,22,29,36 250 mg/m2). RT was delivered by using an integrated IMRT boost concept (54 Gy GTV, 45 Gy CTV) over 5 weeks. RT was followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) weekly × 3 in 4 weeks. Response evaluation using computed tomography followed at week 12. All amenable patients were intended for surgical treatment between week 12–15. Results: 24 pts were enrolled until now. Preliminary results are presented on 20 pts with the following characteristics: pancreatic adenocarcinoma c2 T4 N1 20/20, median age = 63.5 (range 51–79); M/F = 13/7; ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 2/12/6; median days on treatment: 90 (range 70–100). Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 16 pts. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (n = 4), fatigue (n = 2), nausea (n = 3), neutropenia (n = 6), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and vomiting (n = 2). 18/20 pts developed some acneiforme rush during therapy. No omittance of cetuximab therapy was necessary. 1 patient died during RT due to tumor bleeding. Median follow-up at present is 6 month, median survival has not been reached. Partial remissions 8/20, stable disease 9/20, progressive disease 3/20. 12/20 patients were amenable for secondary potentially curative resection. 4 patients could be resected, while 3 patients were found to have abdominal metastatic spread. Conclusions: Early data from trimodal therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with chemoradiation (IMRT), gemcitabine, and cetuximab indicate feasibility without increased toxicity profile. The local response appears to be very promising in pancreatic cancer, potentially allowing neoadjuvant treatment. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document