Calcium-channel blockers linked to reduced risk of Parkinson's disease

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 240-241
2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh G.N. Ton ◽  
Susan R. Heckbert ◽  
W.T. Longstreth ◽  
Mary Anne Rossing ◽  
Walter A. Kukull ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kapil Gudala ◽  
Raju Kanukula ◽  
Dipika Bansal

Aim. To pool the data currently available to determine the association between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD).Methods. Literature search in PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane library was undertaken through March 2014, looking for observational studies evaluating the association between CCBs use and PD. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity Analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis were also performed.Results. Six studies were included in our meta-analysis according to the selection criteria, including three cohort studies and three case-control studies involving 27,67,990 subjects including 11,941 PD cases. We found CCBs use was associated with significant decreased risk of PD, compared with not using CCBs (random effects model pooled RR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69–0.95)); a significant heterogeneity was found between studies (P=0.031;I254.6%). Both the classes of CCB, that is, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DiCCB) (0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.98)P=0.032) and non-DiCCB (0.70 (95% CI, 0.53–0.92)P=0.013), were found to be reducing the risk of PD.Conclusion. In our analysis, we found that CCBs use was associated with a Significantly decreased risk of PD compared with non-CCB use.


2009 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Ritz ◽  
Shannon L. Rhodes ◽  
Lei Qian ◽  
Eva Schernhammer ◽  
Jorgen Olsen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 175 (7) ◽  
pp. 627-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Pasternak ◽  
Henrik Svanström ◽  
Nete M. Nielsen ◽  
Lars Fugger ◽  
Mads Melbye ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonne Lintunen ◽  
Markku Lähteenvuo ◽  
Jari Tiihonen ◽  
Antti Tanskanen ◽  
Heidi Taipale

AbstractRelapses remain common among individuals with schizophrenia indicating a need for improved treatments. Creating a completely new drug molecule is expensive and time consuming, and therefore drug repurposing should be considered. Aim of this study was to investigate the risk of psychiatric rehospitalization associated with use of adenosine modulators (AMs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in schizophrenia. Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (N = 61,889) in inpatient care between 1972–2014 in Finland were included. The follow-up lasted from 1996 to 2017. Main exposures were use of AMs (allopurinol and dipyridamole) and CCBs (dihydropyridines, diltiazem, and verapamil). Thiazide diuretics were used as a negative control. Within-individual models in stratified Cox regression were used and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Use of AMs was associated with a reduced risk of psychiatric rehospitalization on drug class level (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84, P < 0.0001), as well as on the level of individual drugs (allopurinol HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97, P = 0.02; dipyridamole HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55–0.77, P < 0.0001). Use of CCBs was associated with a reduced risk of psychiatric rehospitalization on drug class level (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77–0.86, P < 0.0001). From the different CCBs, only exposure to dihydropyridines was associated with a reduced risk (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74–0.84, P < 0.0001). No effect was observed for the negative control, thiazide diuretics (HR 0.96, 0.90–1.02, P = 0.20). The effects of dipyridamole and dihydropyridines were more pronounced among younger persons and combination of AMs, and CCBs was associated with a lower risk than either drug class as monotherapy. These results indicate a need for randomized controlled trials of these drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document