scholarly journals The need for multidisciplinarity in specialist training to optimize future patient care

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 508-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison C. Tree ◽  
Victoria Harding ◽  
Aneel Bhangu ◽  
Venkatesh Krishnasamy ◽  
Dion Morton ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-332
Author(s):  
Julian Klodmann ◽  
Christopher Schlenk ◽  
Anja Hellings-Kuß ◽  
Thomas Bahls ◽  
Roland Unterhinninghofen ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review Robotic assistance systems for diagnosis and therapy have become technically mature and widely available. Thus, they play an increasingly important role in patient care. This paper provides an overview of the general concepts of robotically assisted surgical systems, briefly revisiting historical and current developments in the surgical robotics market and discussing current focus areas of research. Comprehensiveness cannot be achieved in this format, but besides the general overview, references to further readings and more comprehensive reviews with regard to particular aspects are given. Therefore, the work at hand is considered as an introductory paper into the topic and especially addresses investigators, researchers, medical device manufacturers, and clinicians, who are new to this field. Recent Findings The current research in Robotically Assisted Surgical Systems (RASS) increasingly uses established robotic platforms. To minimize the patient trauma while optimizing the dexterity of the surgeon, miniaturized instruments and semi-autonomous assistance functions are developed. To provide the surgeon with all necessary information in an adequate manner, novel imaging sensors as well as techniques for multimodal sensory feedback and augmented reality are investigated. The Surgical Data Science applies data management and processing approaches including machine learning on medical data to provide optimal, individualized and contextual support to the surgeon. Summary Robotic systems will significantly influence future patient care. Since they must fulfill manifold medical, technical, regulatory and economic requirements, their development calls for a close, active and interdisciplinary cooperation between stakeholders from hospitals, industry and science.


2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Levy ◽  
David A Bradley ◽  
Moya J Morison ◽  
Michael T Swanston ◽  
Sylvia Harvey
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 52-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Levy ◽  
David A Bradley ◽  
Moya J Morison ◽  
Michael T Swanston ◽  
Sylvia Harvey
Keyword(s):  

OTO Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473974X1769277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Spielman ◽  
Wayne D. Hsueh ◽  
Karen Y. Choi ◽  
John P. Bent

Objective Measure the effects of a structured morbidity and mortality conference format on the attitudes of resident and faculty participants. Study Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Otorhinolaryngology–head and neck surgery residency training program. Subjects and Methods Two changes were implemented to the structure of our morbidity and mortality conference: (1) we adopted a recently described presentation framework called situation-background-assessment-recommendation and (2) appointed a faculty moderator to lead the conference. Surveys were distributed to residents and faculty before and after these modifications were implemented to measure changes in attitude of conference attendees. Results After implementing the above changes to the morbidity and mortality conference, participant engagement increased from “moderately engaged” to “extremely engaged” ( P < .01). Among both faculty and residents, the perceived educational value of conference also improved from “moderately educational” to “extremely educational” ( P < .01). Finally in the attending cohort, the impact on future patient care increased from “no change” to “greatly enhanced” ( P < .01). Conclusion By implementing the situation-background-assessment-recommendation framework and appointing a faculty moderator to morbidity and mortality conference, participants reported significantly enhanced engagement during the conference, increased educational value of the session, and a positive impact on future patient care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Dr. Stefanie M. Croghan ◽  
Dr. Evelyn P. Murphy ◽  
Dr. Aideen Madden ◽  
Dr. Robert P. Murphy ◽  
Prof. Rustom P. Manecksha

To explore the perceptions of higher specialist trainees and fellows in Ireland with respect to the Irish Department of Health’s recent proposal to implement a drafted, non-negotiated, consultant contract under a new model for healthcare, termed the Sláintecare plan. A customized survey, incorporating multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions and a free-text option, was disseminated to doctors enrolled in Irish higher specialist training (HST) programmes and pre-consultant HST graduates (fellows). Responses were compiled and analysed. There were a total of 1109 respondents across all specialities. Trainees were particularly concerned regarding the Sláintecare contract’s potential impact on their abilities to engage in patient advocacy and provide optimal patient care in the future, the maintenance of specialist skillsets, their ownership of intellectual property and a stable location of the practice.  Of respondents, 93.7% (1003/1070) indicated that they would consider working abroad rather than accept the proposed contract. This study highlights the perceptions and concerns of the higher specialist trainees and fellows of Ireland. A large proportion may emigrate rather than accept the Sláintecare proposals.  Concerns exist surrounding the ability to advocate for patients, to provide patient care, the proposed working conditions and perceived potential to deskill under this contract’s terms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document