The efficacy and safety of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with refractory ALL and concomitant HBV infection

Leukemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 2790-2793
Author(s):  
Peilong Lai ◽  
Xiaomei Chen ◽  
Le Qin ◽  
Zhiwu Jiang ◽  
Chenwei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

scholarly journals Risk of HBV Reactivation in Patients With Resolved HBV Infection Receiving Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Without Antiviral Prophylaxis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Li ◽  
Lili Zhou ◽  
Shiguang Ye ◽  
Wenjun Zhang ◽  
Junbang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Antiviral Prophylaxis ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a novel treatment modality for hematologic malignancies and is predicted to experience widespread use in the near future. However, not all risks associated with this novel approach are well defined. There are few data in the risk of HBV reactivation and limited experience in management in patients with resolved HBV infection who undergo CAR-T cell therapy.MethodsWe performed a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial of anti-CD19 CAR-T (CART19) cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies, and aimed at exploring the actual risk of HBV reactivation in a cohort of patients with resolved HBV infection receiving CART19 cell therapy in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis.ResultsIn this study, we investigated the risk of HBV reactivation after CART19 cell therapy in 30 consecutive patients with B-cell malignancies and resolved HBV infection without antiviral prophylaxis, in the Tongji Hospital of Tongji University. In this cohort, two patients developed HBV reactivation 2 months and 14 months after CAR-T cell infusion, respectively, the latter of whom developed severe hepatitis. These findings showed that the incidence of HBV reactivation was 6.67% (95% CI, 0.8–22.1). Specifically, none of the 21 patients who were HBsAb positive (0.0%) versus two of nine patients who were HBsAb negative (22.2%) experienced HBV reactivation (p = 0.03), suggesting HbsAb seronegativity at baseline is a possible risk factor in this population. Although use of tocilizumab or corticosteroids has been associated with increased risk of HBV reactivation, none of the patients who received these agents had HBV reactivation in this study.ConclusionThis is the first and largest study to assess the true incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection receiving CART19 cell therapy without antiviral prophylaxis. This study highlights that this population are at risk of developing HBV reactivation and indicates that close monitoring of HBV DNA is required in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. In addition, antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in the HBsAb-negative subpopulation.

scholarly journals Decitabine in Combination with Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide As Lymphodepletion Regimen Followed By CD19/CD22 Bispecific Targeted CAR-T Therapy Significantly Improves Survival in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL Patients: A Pilot Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1754-1754
Author(s):  
Yunju Ma ◽  
Changju Qu ◽  
Haiping Dai ◽  
Sining Liu ◽  
Qingya Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Abstract Background: CD19/CD22 bispecific targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has achieved impressive progress in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), with high rates of complete remission (CR). However, T cell exhaustion caused by de novo DNA methylation restricts the capacity of CAR-T. Decitabine (DAC), a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, has been demonstrated to reverse exhaustion-associated DNA-methylation programs, promote the rejuvenation of CAR-T cells and enhance anti-leukemic effect of CAR-T cells in vitro. To date, there are limited reports about the use of DAC as a part of lymphodepletion therapy before CAR-T cell therapy. Here, we report efficacy and safety of DAC in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) regimen followed by CD19/CD22 CAR-T cell therapy for patients with R/R B-ALL. Method:We conducted a phase 1/2 clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of CD19/CD22 CAR-T in the treatment of R/R B-ALL (NCT03614858). Fourteen patients were treated with DAC (total dose 100mg/m 2 in 3 days) followed by FC regimen (fludarabine 30mg/m 2 × 3d and cyclophosphamide 300mg/m 2 × 3d) (DAC group), while twelve patients received FC regimen prior to CAR-T cell infusion (CON group). A total of 1 or 2 × 10 7 CAR-T cells/kg were infused at dose escalation. Results: Baseline characteristics of patients in both groups had no significant differences except previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There were more patients with relapse after HSCT in DAC group (42.9% versus 0%, P=0.017). All patients did not achieve remission before lymphodepletion. The day 28 CR rates were 100% in DAC group and 91.7% in CON group. Furthermore, minimal residual disease (MRD) negative CR rates were 71.4% and 58.3%, respectively (P = 0.683). There was no significant difference in the proportion of nontransplant patients after CAR-T treatment between two groups. Among the nontransplant patients after CAR-T infusion in DAC group, 16.7% (1/6) of patients relapsed at 4 months. However, among 4 nontransplant patients in CON group, 1 patient achieved NR after CAR-T therapy and 3 patients relapsed at 1.5, 5, and 10 months. There were significant differences in overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) between two groups: 3-year OS, 88.9% (DAC) versus 33.3% (CON), P = 0.01 and 3-year LFS, 92.3% (DAC) versus 21.8% (CON), P = 0.002. Multivariable analysis showed that addition of DAC to the lymphodepletion regimen was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.107, [95% CI, 0.013-0.875], P = 0.037) and LFS (HR 0.081, [95% CI, 0.01-0.65], P = 0.018). Cytokine release syndrome was observed in all patients. Conclusion: In summary, DAC in combination with FC regimen followed by CD19CD22 CAR-T cells was feasible and well tolerated. Our study demonstrated DAC combined with FC was an independent prognostic factor correlated with better survival in relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel Administration in Lymphoma Patients With Secondary CNS Involvement: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
XiaoQin Wu ◽  
XinYue Zhang ◽  
RenDe Xun ◽  
MengSi Liu ◽  
Zhen Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients with a history of/active secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded from the licensing trials conducted on two widely used CAR-T cell products, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel). Hence, the objective of the present review was to assess whether secondary CNS lymphoma patients would derive a benefit from Axi-cel or Tisa-cel therapy, while maintaining controllable safety.MethodTwo reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library independently in order to identify all records associated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel published prior to February 15, 2021. Studies that included secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel and reported or could be inferred efficacy and safety endpoints of secondary CNS lymphoma patients were included. A tool designed specifically to evaluate the risk of bias in case series and reports and the ROBINS-I tool applied for cohort studies were used.ResultsTen studies involving forty-four patients were included. Of these, seven were case reports or series. The other three reports were cohort studies involving twenty-five patients. Current evidence indicates that secondary CNS lymphoma patients could achieve long-term remission following Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment. Compared with the non-CNS cohort, however, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be shorter. This was possibly due to the relatively small size of the CNS cohort. The incidence and grades of adverse effects in secondary CNS lymphoma patients resembled those in the non-CNS cohort. No incidences of CAR-T cell-related deaths were reported. Nevertheless, the small sample size introduced a high risk of bias and prevented the identification of specific patients who could benefit more from CAR-T cell therapy.ConclusionSecondary CNS lymphoma patients could seem to benefit from both Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment, with controllable risks. Thus, CAR-T cell therapy has potential as a candidate treatment for lymphoma patients with CNS involvement. Further prospective studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are warranted and recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document