scholarly journals Outcomes following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients treated with standard chemotherapy with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia

Author(s):  
Cécile Pautas ◽  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
Juliette Lambert ◽  
Ollivier Legrand ◽  
Sylvain Chantepie ◽  
...  

AbstractThe phase 3 ALFA-0701 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with fractionated-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) combined with standard chemotherapy vs. standard chemotherapy alone in adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We examined post-transplant outcomes and occurrence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) in patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as follow-up therapy in ALFA-0701. Patients aged 50–70 years were randomized to standard chemotherapy with or without GO (3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, and 7 of induction and day 1 on each of two consolidation courses). Allogeneic HSCT was recommended for patients in first complete remission with matched (related or unrelated) donor, except those with core-binding factor AML or normal karyotype and either NPM1+/FLT3-ITDwt or CEBPA+ AML. Eighty-five patients (GO: n = 32; control: n = 53) received HSCT in first complete remission or after relapse/primary induction failure. Three patients (GO: n = 2; control: n = 1 [received GO as follow-up therapy]) developed VOD/SOS after HSCT or conditioning. Post-transplant survival, non-relapse mortality, and relapse were not different between arms. Results indicate fractionated-dose GO as part of induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML does not induce excess post-transplant VOD/SOS or mortality and thus does not preclude the use of HSCT as consolidation treatment.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijie Cao ◽  
Xiaoning Li ◽  
Ran Zhang ◽  
Zhilei Bian ◽  
Suping Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose We aimed to validate and prove the novel risk score models of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-specific disease risk group (AML-DRG) and AML-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-composite risk (AML-HCT-CR) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT). Methods One hundred twenty-three AML (non-APL) patients underwent AHCT was enrolled in this study. Patients were stratified into 3 AML-DRG and 4 AML-HCT-CR risk groups. Of the 123 patients, 57 (46.3%) were females, and the median age was 31 years (range 12 to 62 years). All patients received myeloablative conditioning. Median follow-up was 46 months (range 1 to 94 months). AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR score models were applied with the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) analysis after the clinical follow-up. Results For the AML-DRG model, the 3-year OS in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups were 65.4%, 34.9% and 8.3%, respectively (p<0.001). The corresponding 3-year PFS were 64.0%, 34.9% and 8.3% (p<0.001). The OS predictive accuracy measured by C-index was 0.680. In the AML-HCT-CR model, the 3-year OS in the low, intermediate, high and very high-risk groups were 65.4%, 52.0%, 11.1% and 8.3%, respectively (p<0.001). The corresponding 3-year PFS were 64.0%, 52.0%, 11.1% and 8.3% (p<0.001). The OS predictive accuracy measured by C-index was 0.705. The AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models significantly predicted cumulative incidence of relapse (p=0.002; p=0.005). But both scores were not associated with NRM (p=0.314; p=0.095). Univariate analysis showed that the AML-DRG model could better stratify AML patients into different risk groups compared to the AML-HCT-CR model. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognostic impact of AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models on post-transplant OS was independent to age, sex, conditioning type, transplant modality, and stem cell source (p<0.001; p<0.001). Conclusions The AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models can be used to effectively predict post-transplant survival in patients with AML receiving AHCT in our center. Compared to AML-HCT-CR score, the AML-DRG score allows better stratification and improved survival prediction of AML patients post-transplant.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3913-3913
Author(s):  
Rebeca Bailen ◽  
Maria Jesus Pascual-Cascon ◽  
Manuel Guerreiro ◽  
Lucía López Corral ◽  
Anabelle Chinea ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: High-dose post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) effectively prevents graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after unmanipulated HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and offer low rates of GVHD in the setting of HLA identical transplant. The objective of our study was to compare the outcomes of haplo vs HLA identical HSCT in patients undergoing HSCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using PTCY. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 229 patients undergoing a first HSCT for AML using PTCY, 130 from an haploidentical donor between 2013 and 2018 (median follow up 62.5 months) and 99 from a matched sibling (MSD) (n=38) or unrelated donor (MUD) (n=61) (median follow up 27 months) between 2013 and 2019, in 20 centers in Spain. Last update of the cohort was performed in March 2021. Results: Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were more patients with active disease at transplant (5% MSD/MUD vs. 20% haplo, p=0.001), high/very high DRI (32% vs. 67%, p=0.000) and prior autologous HSCT (2% vs. 11%, p=0.010) in the haplo group. Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells was the most frequent stem cell source in both groups. Most patients received myeloablative conditioning (55% vs. 64%, p=0.170). All Patients in the haplo group received PTCY days +3+4 followed by a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and MMF from +5. In the MSD/MUD group, 37% received both CNI+MMF, 33% only CNI and 30% PTCY with sirolimus+MMF (this group included only MUD donors). None of the patients received ATG. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery at day 28 was 97% in both groups, with a median of 16 and 17 days respectively (p=0.948). Both 2-year overall survival (OS) (72% vs. 62%, p=0.07) and event-free survival (EFS) (70% vs. 54%, p=0.055) were higher in the MSD/MUD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 1). Multivariate analysis only identified age and pre-transplant status as independent risk factors for OS, and pre-transplant status for EFS. No differences were found in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years (19% vs. 25%, p=0.13) and non-relapse mortality (14% vs. 19%, p=0.145). Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was lower in MSD/MUD (14% vs. 47%, p=0.000, Figure 2), while III-IV aGVHD was similar (4% vs. 9%, p=0.14). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD and moderate-severe cGVHD at 2 years was similar for both groups (42% vs. 33% (p=0.051); 22% vs. 19% (p=0.28)). No differences were found in GRFS (48% vs. 46% (p=0.506)). Most frequent cause of death in the early post-transplant period was non-GVHD related infection in both groups. Conclusions: in our experience, PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis in both MSD/MUD and Haplo transplant in AML using mostly PBSC effectively prevents GVHD and offers similar NRM, relapse and survival rates. Poor control of the disease before transplant was the only factor affecting OS and EFS in this setting. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our results. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bailen: Pfizer, Kite-Gilead, Gilead: Honoraria. Guerreiro: Novartis, Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oarbeascoa: Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3428-3428
Author(s):  
Van Hung Tran ◽  
Florence Persat ◽  
Sophie Gardes ◽  
Jeremy Monfray ◽  
Sophie Ducastelle-Leprêtre ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains an important cause of mortality in immunocompromised acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving induction chemotherapy and in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for hematological malignancies. Early diagnostic is critical and challenging given the efficacy and availability of several new anti-fungal therapies. In this study, we evaluated the performance of different factors in predicting the occurrence of IA, including the Aspergillus antigen galactomannan (GM) detection in sera. Methods We included all AML patients receiving induction chemotherapy and patients undergoing allo-HSCT for any hematological malignancy at our center between April 2006 and April 2014 with available data on Aspergillus antigen GM. Serologic detection of circulating GM fungal biomarker was considered during the 100 days following the first day of induction chemotherapy in AML patients or from the day of allo-HSCT. Usual follow-up included two GM tests per week, only patients with at least three serum GM results were considered. The GM tests have been performed routinely using the ELISA kit (Platelia Aspergillus antigen ELISA, Biorad), giving the results in index values. Demographic, GM index results and diagnostic data were collected. IA cases were classified as proven or probable according to the EORTC criteria. The value of the first antigen test, the delay to positivity, and the slope of the progression of the index value between the first two antigens concentrations were considered as predictors of IA. ROC curves for each predictor and their combination were performed and prognostic scores were established. Results A total of 775 patients were included : i) 292 AML patients, 153 (52%) males with a median age of 62 years (range: 17-79), 15% were classified as favorable, 8% as intermediate I, 18% as intermediate II and 59% as unfavorable according to cytogenetics and molecular markers; ii) 483 allo-HSCT patients, 293 (61%) were males, median age was 48 years (range: 18-70), among them 234 (48%) AML, 66 (14%) multiple myeloma, 46 (10%) Myelodysplastic syndromes, 38 (8%) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and the rest of patients had other hematological disorders; 233 (48 %) patients received reduced intensity conditioning and 250 (52%) myeloablative conditioning. The disease status at allo-HSCT was complete remission (CR) in 366 (76%) patients and the rest of patients were in less than CR. HSC source was peripheral blood in 42.2% (90 identical siblings, 150 10/10 matched unrelated, 54 9/10 mismatched unrelated), bone marrow in 42.6% (105 identical siblings, 162 10/10 matched unrelated, 45 9/10 mismatched unrelated) and cord blood in 15.2%. A total of 877 episodes with 16121 GM serum antigen results was considered (median: 18 GM tests per patient). During the follow-up, we identified 121 episodes with at least one positive GM test with a cumulative incidence at day 100 of 13.8%. We also diagnosed 48 IA (2 proven, 46 probable), with a cumulative incidence at day 100 of 5.5% in total, 7.2% in AML and 4.3% in allo-HSCT, respectively. We then classified the GM positive episodes in 82 false-positive (68%) and 39 true-positive episodes (32%) for IA, respectively. A majority of IA events occurred during the first 30 days of follow up, GM positivity showing a positive predictive value of 41% versus a negative predictive value of 99%. The three IA predicting factors had similar independent effects and their combinations were performed, allowing the establishment of an area under ROC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.89). Cut off values of the first positive GM serum and slope were equal or higher than 1.04 and 0.04, respectively, and delay to positivity equal or less than 15 days. To simplify the practical use in clinical practice, the prognostic score defining the IA risk probability was defined as the number of predictors present (values from 0 to 3). This score was tested on positive follow-up giving values of 0, 1, 2 or higher for 45 (37%), 39 (32%) and 37 episodes (31%), respectively. A score superior or equal to 2 was indicative of IA in 62% of the cases (figure 1). Conclusion As IA has a significant impact on hematology patient's survival, this GM predictive score combining three predictors (value of the first antigen index, delay of positivity and slope of the index values) may help clinicians to conclude about starting an early preemptive IA treatment. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4161-4161
Author(s):  
Yingjun Chang ◽  
Honghu Zhu ◽  
Lanping Xu ◽  
Hao Jiang ◽  
Daihong Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4161 Purpose: The role of HLA-haploidentical related donors (HRD) hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1) for adults with intermediate and poor risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still not clear. Patients and Methods: Totally 428 newly diagnosed AML patients between 15 and 60 years old were studied between Jan 2006 and May 2010. Among 240 patients with intermediate and poor risk cytogenetics, 191patients achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone or HSCT as post-remission treatment. Of these, 141 patients received chemotherapy alone (n=78) or HRD HSCT (n=63) were analyzed. Results: Up to last follow-up time of May 2011, 44 out of 141 patients died (36 died of relapse and 8 died of TRM) and 97 patients are still alive. 49 out of 141 patients experienced relapse and 84 patients are still in continuous CR1. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 4 years was 37.4%±4.4%. Overall survival(OS) and disease-free survival(DFS) at 4 year was 63.8%±5.0% and 55.5%±4.9%, respectively. The CIR of HRD HSCT group was significantly lower than chemotherapy group(12.8%±6.1% vs.57.4%±5.6%, p<0.0001). HRD HSCT improved survival achieved by chemotherapy alone significantly (DFS at 4 years, 71.8%±6.9% v 42.6%±6.1%, p<0.0001;OS at 4 years,75.7% ±7.0% v 54.6%±6.1%, p=0.0014). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed post-remission treatment choice (HRD HSCT or chemotherapy) and high WBC at diagnosis were independent risk factor affecting relapse, DFS and OS. Conclusion: HRD HSCT in CR1 is superior to chemotherapy alone for adults with intermediate and poor risk AML patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5476-5476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harinder Gill ◽  
Albert Kwok Wai Lie ◽  
Yok Lam Kwong ◽  
Anskar Y.H. Leung

Abstract Introduction and aim. Relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major cause of treatment failure and is associated with a poor prognosis. Overall survivals are around 50% at 5 years following allogeneic HSCT in intermediate and high risk AML. Survivals remain less than 20% in poor-risk and very poor-risk patients based on the cytogenetic profile. Thus, prevention of relapse following allogeneic HSCT remains an unmet clinical need. Low-dose azacitidine maintenance post-HSCT has been shown to augment graft-versus-leukemia effect and may prolong survivals. We aim to prospectively evaluate the effect of azacitidine maintenance following allogeneic HSCT in high risk AML and MDS. Method. Consecutive patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in remission following first allogeneic HSCT or second allogeneic HSCT (from the original donor) were recruited. High risk AML in this study comprised patients with poor risk karyotype, secondary AML transformed from underlying MDS, presence of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3 -ITD) and non-remission before HSCT. Azacitidine was administered at 100mg daily for 3 days per cycle every 28 days until progression or a maximum of 8 cycles. The clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics were determined. The occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was determined. DNA chimerism was determined in the bone marrow before the initiation of azacitidine, after 4th and 8th cycles of azacitidine and at 1 year. DNA chimerism was determined by quantification of polymorphic short tandem repeat sequences. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. Thirty-four patients with high-risk AML (N=31) and MDS (N=3) were recruited. The median duration of follow-up was 14 months (range: 2 - 44 months). Twenty-two patients received azacitidine maintenance after first allogeneic HSCT, whereas 12 patients received azacitidine maintenance after a second allogeneic HSCT from the same donor following relapse from a first allogeneic HSCT For patients receiving azacitidine after first HSCT, at a median follow-up of 18.5 months (range: 5- 36 months), the median PFS was not reached, and the median OS was 32 months (95% confidence interval [C.I.]: 24.85-39.15). The 24-month PFS and OS were 66.1% and 73.2% respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 7 (31.8%) and 17 patients (77%). For patients receiving azacitidine after second HSCT, at a median follow-up of 14 months (range: 9 - 46 months), the median PFS and OS were 9 months (95% C.I.:6.94-11.04) and 14 months (range: 11.77 - 16.23 months). The 24-month PFS and OS were 25% and 14% respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 1 (8.3%) and 5 (41.7%) patients respectively. In both groups, 100% donor chimerism was achieved during azacitidine maintenance. Conclusion. Azacitidine maintenance following first allogeneic HSCT resulted in favorable 2-year survivals in selected patients with high-risk AML and MDS. Nevertheless, survivals were poor despite azacitidine maintenance after second allogeneic HSCT from the same donor. Full donor chimerism was maintained during azacitidine maintenance. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document