scholarly journals Petroleum exploration increases methane emissions from northern peatlands

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Strack ◽  
Shari Hayne ◽  
Julie Lovitt ◽  
Gregory J. McDermid ◽  
Mir Mustafizur Rahman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elodie Salmon ◽  
Fabrice Jégou ◽  
Bertrand Guenet ◽  
Line Jourdain ◽  
Chunjing Qiu ◽  
...  

Abstract. In the global methane budget, the largest natural source is attributed to wetlands that encompass all ecosystems composed of waterlogged or inundated ground, capable of methane production. Among them, northern peatlands that store large amounts of soil organic carbon have been functioning, since the end of the last glaciation period, as long-term sources of methane (CH4) and are one of the most significant methane sources among wetlands. To reduce global methane budget uncertainties, it is of significance to understand processes driving methane production and fluxes in northern peatlands. A methane model that features methane production and transport by plants, ebullition process and diffusion in soil, oxidation to CO2 and CH4 fluxes to the atmosphere has been embedded in the ORCHIDEE-PEAT land surface model which includes an explicit representation of northern peatlands. This model, ORCHIDEE-PCH4 was calibrated and evaluated on 14 peatland sites distributed on both Eurasian and American continents in the northern boreal and temperate regions. Data assimilation approaches were employed to optimized parameters at each site and at all sites simultaneously. Results show that, in ORCHIDEE-PCH4, methanogenesis is sensitive to temperature and substrate availability over the top 75 cm of soil depth. Methane emissions estimated using single site optimization (SSO) of model parameters are underestimated by 9 g CH4 m−2 year−1 on average (i.e. 50 % higher than the site average of yearly methane emissions). While using the multi-sites optimization (MSO), methane emissions are overestimated by 5 g CH4 m−2 year−1 on average across all investigated sites (i.e. 37 % lower than the site average of yearly methane emissions).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elodie Salmon ◽  
Fabrice Jégou ◽  
Bertrand Guenet ◽  
Line Jourdain ◽  
Chunjing Qiu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 565-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wania ◽  
I. Ross ◽  
I. C. Prentice

Abstract. For the first time, a model that simulates methane emissions from northern peatlands is incorporated directly into a dynamic global vegetation model. The model, LPJ-WHyMe (LPJ Wetland Hydrology and Methane), was previously modified in order to simulate peatland hydrology, permafrost dynamics and peatland vegetation. LPJ-WHyMe simulates methane emissions using a mechanistic approach, although the use of some empirical relationships and parameters is unavoidable. The model simulates methane production, three pathways of methane transport (diffusion, plant-mediated transport and ebullition) and methane oxidation. A sensitivity test was conducted to identify the most important factors influencing methane emissions, followed by a parameter fitting exercise to find the best combination of parameter values for individual sites and over all sites. A comparison of model results to observations from seven sites resulted in normalised root mean square errors (NRMSE) of 0.40 to 1.15 when using the best site parameter combinations and 0.68 to 1.42 when using the best overall parameter combination.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wania ◽  
I. Ross ◽  
I. C. Prentice

Abstract. For the first time, a model that simulates methane emissions from northern peatlands is incorporated directly into a dynamic global vegetation model. The model, LPJ-WHyMe (LPJ-Wetland Hydrology and Methane), was previously modified in order to simulate peatland hydrology, permafrost dynamics and peatland vegetation. LPJ-WHyMe simulates methane emissions using a mechanistic approach, although the use of some empirical relationships and parameters is unavoidable. The model simulates methane production, three pathways of methane transport (diffusion, plant-mediated transport and ebullition) and methane oxidation. Two sensitivity tests were conducted, first to identify the most important factors influencing methane emissions and secondly to justify the choice of parameters. A comparison of model results to observations from seven sites revealed in general good agreement but also highlighted some problems. Circumpolar methane emissions for the period 1961–1990 were estimated to be between 40.8 and 73.7 Tg CH4 a-1.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire C. Treat ◽  
Miriam C. Jones ◽  
Laura S. Brosius ◽  
Guido Grosse ◽  
Katey Walter Anthony ◽  
...  

<p>The sources of atmospheric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) during the Holocene remain widely debated, including the role of high latitude wetland and peatland expansion and fen-to-bog transitions. We reconstructed CH<sub>4 </sub>emissions from northern peatlands from 13,000 before present (BP) to present using an empirical model based on observations of peat initiation (>3600 <sup>14</sup>C dates), peatland type (>250 peat cores), and contemporary CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in order to explore the effects of changes in wetland type and peatland expansion on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over the end of the late glacial and the Holocene. We find that fen area increased steadily before 8000 BP as fens formed in major wetland complexes. After 8000 BP, new fen formation continued but widespread peatland succession (to bogs) and permafrost aggradation occurred. Reconstructed CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from peatlands increased rapidly between 10,600 BP and 6900 BP due to fen formation and expansion. Emissions stabilized after 5000 BP at 42 ± 25 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> y<sup>-1</sup> as high-emitting fens transitioned to lower-emitting bogs and permafrost peatlands. Widespread permafrost formation in northern peatlands after 1000 BP led to drier and colder soils which decreased CH<sub>4 </sub>emissions by 20% to 34 ± 21 Tg y<sup>-1</sup> by the present day.</p><p> </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document