scholarly journals Subthalamic deep brain stimulation improves sleep and excessive sweating in Parkinson’s disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silje Bjerknes ◽  
Inger Marie Skogseid ◽  
Tuva Jin Hauge ◽  
Espen Dietrichs ◽  
Mathias Toft
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Autonomic Dysfunction ◽  
Sleep Disturbances ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a complex multisystem disorder with motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS). NMS may have an even greater impact on quality of life than motor symptoms. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has been shown to improve motor fluctuations and quality of life, whereas the effects on different NMS have been less examined. Sleep disturbances and autonomic dysfunction are among the most prevalent NMS. We here report the efficacy of STN-DBS on sleep disturbances and autonomic dysfunction. In the parent trial, 60 patients were included in a single-center randomized prospective study, with MDS-UPDRS III and PDQ-39 as primary endpoints at 12 months of STN-DBS. Preplanned assessments at baseline and postoperatively at 3 and 12 months also included Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS); Scopa-Aut; and MDS-UPDRS I, II, and IV. We found that STN-DBS had a significant and lasting positive effect on overall sleep quality, nocturnal motor symptoms and restlessness, and daytime dozing. Several aspects of autonomic dysfunction were also improved at 3 months postoperatively, although at 12 months only thermoregulation (sudomotor symptoms) remained significantly improved. We could not identify preoperative factors that predicted improvement in PDSS or Scopa-Aut. There was a close relationship between improved autonomic symptoms and improved quality of life after 1 year. NMS and especially sleep and autonomic dysfunction deserve more focus to improve patient outcomes further.

Clinical outcomes following awake and asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsinsue Chen ◽  
Zaman Mirzadeh ◽  
Kristina M. Chapple ◽  
Margaret Lambert ◽  
Holly A. Shill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

OBJECTIVERecent studies have shown similar clinical outcomes between Parkinson disease (PD) patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) under general anesthesia without microelectrode recording (MER), so-called “asleep” DBS, and historical cohorts undergoing “awake” DBS with MER guidance. However, few studies include internal controls. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes after globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS using awake and asleep techniques at a single institution.METHODSPD patients undergoing awake or asleep bilateral GPi or STN DBS were prospectively monitored. The primary outcome measure was stimulation-induced change in motor function off medication 6 months postoperatively, measured using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life, measured by the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), change in levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD), stereotactic accuracy, stimulation parameters, and adverse events.RESULTSSix-month outcome data were available for 133 patients treated over 45 months (78 GPi [16 awake, 62 asleep] and 55 STN [14 awake, 41 asleep]). UPDRS-III score improvement with stimulation did not differ between awake and asleep groups for GPi (awake, 20.8 points [38.5%]; asleep, 18.8 points [37.5%]; p = 0.45) or STN (awake, 21.6 points [40.3%]; asleep, 26.1 points [48.8%]; p = 0.20) targets. The percentage improvement in PDQ-39 and LEDD was similar for awake and asleep groups for both GPi (p = 0.80 and p = 0.54, respectively) and STN cohorts (p = 0.85 and p = 0.49, respectively).CONCLUSIONSIn PD patients, bilateral GPi and STN DBS using the asleep method resulted in motor, quality-of-life, and medication reduction outcomes that were comparable to those of the awake method.

scholarly journals Neuropsychological and quality of life assessment in patients with Parkinson's disease submitted to bilateral deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Shenandoa Heluani ◽  
Fábio Henrique de Gobbi Porto ◽  
Sergio Listik ◽  
Alexandre Walter de Campos ◽  
Alexandre Aluizio Costa Machado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Deep Brain

ABSTRACT Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been widely used to control motor symptoms and improve quality of life in patients with Parkinsons disease (PD). Recently, DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has become the preferred target for patients with mixed motor symptoms. Despite resultant motor and quality of life improvements, the procedure has been associated with cognitive decline, mainly in language skills, and also with psychiatric symptoms. Objective: To evaluate the influence of DBS in the STN on cognition, mood and quality of life. Methods: We studied 20 patients with PD submitted to DBS in the STN from May 2008 to June 2012 with an extensive battery of cognitive tests including memory, language, praxis, executive functions and attention assessments; the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), were applied both before and after the surgery. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 and results compared using the paired Student's t test. Results: A total of 20 patients with pre and post-operative assessments were included. A statistically significant improvement was found in total score and on subscales of mobility, activities of daily living and emotional well-being from the PDQ-39 (P=0.009, 0.025, 0.001 and 0.034, respectively). No significant difference was found on the cognitive battery or mood scale. Conclusion: DBS in the SNT improved quality of life in PD with no negative impact on cognitive skills and mood.

217 Clinical Outcomes Following Awake and Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 259-259
Author(s):  
Tsinsue Chen ◽  
Zaman Mirzadeh ◽  
Kristina Chapple ◽  
Margaret Lambert ◽  
Holly Shill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract INTRODUCTION Recent studies show similar clinical outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) under general anesthesia without microelectrode recording (MER), so-called “asleep” DBS, compared to historical cohorts undergoing “awake” DBS with MER guidance. Very few studies, however, include internal controls. This study compares clinical outcomes following globus pallidus interna (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS using awake and asleep techniques at a single institution. METHODS PD patients undergoing awake or asleep bilateral GPi or STN DBS were prospectively followed. The primary outcome measure was stimulation-induced change in motor function 6 months postoperatively, measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III) with the patient off medication. Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life, measured by the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), change in levodopa daily equivalent dose (LEDD), stereotactic accuracy, stimulation parameters, and adverse events. RESULTS >Six-month outcome data were available for 133 patients treated over 45 months (78 GPi [16 awake, 62 asleep] and 55 STN [14 awake and 41 asleep]). UPDRS-III score improvement with stimulation did not differ between awake and asleep groups for GPi (awake = 20.8 points [38.5%], asleeP = 18.8 points [37.5%], P = 0.45) or STN (awake = 21.6 points [40.3%], asleeP = 26.1 points [48.8%], P = 0.20) targets. The percentage improvement in PDQ-39 and LEDD was similar for awake and asleep groups for both GPi (P = 0.80, P = 0.54, respectively) and STN cohorts (P = 0.85, P = 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION In PD patients, bilateral GPi and STN DBS utilizing the asleep method resulted in motor, quality-of-life, and medication reduction outcomes comparable to the awake method.

scholarly journals Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Executive Summary

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 753-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Rughani ◽  
Jason M Schwalb ◽  
Christos Sidiropoulos ◽  
Julie Pilitsis ◽  
Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Level I ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Similar Risk ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract QUESTION 1 Is bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) more, less, or as effective as bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, as measured by improvements in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (UPDRS-III) scores? RECOMMENDATION Given that bilateral STN DBS is at least as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (as measured by improvements in UPDRS-III scores), consideration can be given to the selection of either target in patients undergoing surgery to treat motor symptoms. (Level I) QUESTION 2 Is bilateral STN DBS more, less, or as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in allowing reduction of dopaminergic medication in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION When the main goal of surgery is reduction of dopaminergic medications in a patient with Parkinson's disease, then bilateral STN DBS should be performed instead of GPi DBS. (Level I) QUESTION 3 Is bilateral STN DBS more, less, or as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in treating dyskinesias associated with Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION There is insufficient evidence to make a generalizable recommendation regarding the target selection for reduction of dyskinesias. However, when the reduction of medication is not anticipated and there is a goal to reduce the severity of “on” medication dyskinesias, the GPi should be targeted. (Level I) QUESTION 4 Is bilateral STN DBS more, less, or as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in improving quality of life measures in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION When considering improvements in quality of life in a patient undergoing DBS for Parkinson's disease, there is no basis to recommend bilateral DBS in 1 target over the other. (Level I) QUESTION 5 Is bilateral STN DBS associated with greater, lesser, or a similar impact on neurocognitive function than bilateral GPi DBS in Parkinson disease? RECOMMENDATION If there is significant concern about cognitive decline, particularly in regards to processing speed and working memory in a patient undergoing DBS, then the clinician should consider using GPi DBS rather than STN DBS, while taking into consideration other goals of surgery. (Level I) QUESTION 6 Is bilateral STN DBS associated with a higher, lower, or similar risk of mood disturbance than GPi DBS in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION If there is significant concern about the risk of depression in a patient undergoing DBS, then the clinician should consider using pallidal rather than STN stimulation, while taking into consideration other goals of surgery. (Level I) QUESTION 7 Is bilateral STN DBS associated with a higher, lower, or similar risk of adverse events compared to GPi DBS in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION There is insufficient evidence to recommend bilateral DBS in 1 target over the other in order to minimize the risk of surgical adverse events.  The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/deep-brain-stimulation-parkinsons-disease.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease Treatment: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Rufino Marques Pellegrin ◽  
Arthur Neves Egídio ◽  
Alexandre Jahara Moreira Gomes Teixeira ◽  
Carolina Mendonça Cyranka ◽  
Diogo Abrantes de Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Quality Of Sleep ◽  
Deep Brain

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising adjuvant therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) in intermediate and advanced states, improving motor symptoms and life quality. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of DBS in PD treatment. Design and Setting: Systematic review performed on medical school in Brazil. Methods: A literature review in the MedLine database was conducted using the following descriptors: “Deep Brain Stimulation”, “Parkinson’s Disease” and its variations according to MeSH. Only randomized controlled trials conducted in humans and published in English in the last 10 years were included. The PRISMA statement was used to improve this systematic review’s findings. Results: Three clinical trials that evaluated the effects of DBS in PD’s management were analysed. The main result measurement tools used in the studies were the PDQ-39-SI and UPDRS-III scores. Hacked ML et al. (2018) concluded that drug therapy + DBS was significantly superior to isolated drug therapy (p <0.0002). Schuepbach WMM et al. (2019) found that the experimental group presented significantly better outcomes in comparison to the control group (p <0,05). Birchall EL et al. (2016) suggested that the DBS device implant in the subthalamic nucleus caused significant improvement in depressive symptoms, motor symptoms, quality of sleep (p <0.0001) and quality of life (p=0.0005) in comparison to the control group. Conclusions: DBS has shown to be an efficient therapy for PD, once it promoted better outcomes regarding motor symptoms, depression, quality of life and quality of sleep. However, it is necessary to be aware of eventual side effects in the post-operative period.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease – Impact on Quality of Life

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 ((Suppl.1)) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Toft ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Deep Brain

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is reduced in Parkinson’s disease patients. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for motor problems and motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Three randomised trials were recently conducted to assess the effects of DBS on HRQoL. All studies found improvements in HRQoL after surgery. DBS of the subthalamic nucleus and the globus pallidus interna improved HRQoL to a similar degree. However, in the long-term, such improvements may not be maintained, perhaps because HRQoL is a subjective measure and subjective perceptions of disability may change over time. DBS has proven long-term efficacy on motor symptoms, and the decline in benefit over time may also be explained by progression in the non-motor symptoms of the disease. Several predictors of HRQoL improvements after DBS have been identified, including good levodopa response, young age and good cognitive function.

Motor Symptom Asymmetry Predicts Non-motor Outcome and Quality of Life Following STN DBS in Parkinson's Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Péron ◽  
Philippe Voruz ◽  
Jordan Pierce ◽  
Kévin Ahrweiller ◽  
Claire Haegelen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Motor Symptom ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Healthy Control ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Stn Dbs

Abstract Risk factors for long-term non-motor disorders and quality of life following subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation (STN DBS) have not yet been fully identified. In the present study, we investigated the impact of motor symptom asymmetry in Parkinson’s disease.Data were extracted for 52 patients with Parkinson’s disease (half with left-sided motor symptoms and half with right-sided ones) who underwent bilateral STN and a matched healthy control group. Performances for cognitive tests and neuropsychiatric and quality-of-life questionnaires at 12 months post-DBS were compared with a pre-DBS baseline. Results indicated a deterioration in cognitive performance post-DBS in patients with left-sided motor symptoms. Performances of patients with right-sided motor symptoms were maintained, except for a verbal executive task. These differential effects had an impact on patients’ quality of life. The results highlight the existence of two distinct cognitive profiles of Parkinson’s disease, depending on motor symptom asymmetry. This asymmetry is a potential risk factor for non-motor adverse effects following STN DBS.

scholarly journals The Prevalence of Fatigue Following Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery in Parkinson's Disease and Association with Quality of Life

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benzi M. Kluger ◽  
Veronica Parra ◽  
Charles Jacobson ◽  
Cynthia W. Garvan ◽  
Ramon L. Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Neuropsychological Battery ◽  
One Year ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery ◽  
Deep Brain

Fatigue is a common and disabling nonmotor symptom seen in Parkinson’s disease (PD). While deep brain stimulation surgery (DBS) improves motor symptoms, it has also been associated with non-motor side effects. To date no study has utilized standardized instruments to evaluate fatigue following DBS surgery. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of fatigue following DBS surgery in PD its impact on quality of life and explore predictive factors. We recruited 44 PD subjects. At least one year following DBS placement, we administered the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the UPDRS, and a neuropsychological battery. Fifty-eight percent of subjects had moderate to severe fatigue. Fatigue was significantly associated with quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Depression preoperatively was the only predictive factor of fatigue. Fatigue is common following DBS surgery and significantly impacts quality of life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document