scholarly journals Observational identification of a sample of likely recent common-envelope events

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo Khouri ◽  
Wouter H. T. Vlemmings ◽  
Daniel Tafoya ◽  
Andrés F. Pérez-Sánchez ◽  
Carmen Sánchez Contreras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 501 (2) ◽  
pp. 2209-2209
Author(s):  
Luke Chamandy ◽  
Yisheng Tu ◽  
Eric G Blackman ◽  
Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback ◽  
Adam Frank ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 501 (1) ◽  
pp. 676-682
Author(s):  
F Lagos ◽  
M R Schreiber ◽  
M Zorotovic ◽  
B T Gänsicke ◽  
M P Ronco ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The discovery of a giant planet candidate orbiting the white dwarf WD 1856+534 with an orbital period of 1.4 d poses the questions of how the planet reached its current position. We here reconstruct the evolutionary history of the system assuming common envelope evolution as the main mechanism that brought the planet to its current position. We find that common envelope evolution can explain the present configuration if it was initiated when the host star was on the asymptotic giant branch, the separation of the planet at the onset of mass transfer was in the range 1.69–2.35 au, and if in addition to the orbital energy of the surviving planet either recombination energy stored in the envelope or another source of additional energy contributed to expelling the envelope. We also discuss the evolution of the planet prior to and following common envelope evolution. Finally, we find that if the system formed through common envelope evolution, its total age is in agreement with its membership to the Galactic thin disc. We therefore conclude that common envelope evolution is at least as likely as alternative formation scenarios previously suggested such as planet–planet scattering or Kozai–Lidov oscillations.


2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 339-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Pustylnik ◽  
P. Kalv ◽  
V. Harvig ◽  
T. Aas

2021 ◽  
Vol 502 (1) ◽  
pp. L35-L39
Author(s):  
F Dell’Agli ◽  
E Marini ◽  
F D’Antona ◽  
P Ventura ◽  
M A T Groenewegen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Modelling dust formation in single stars evolving through the carbon-star stage of the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) reproduces well the mid-infrared colours and magnitudes of most of the C-rich sources in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), apart from a small subset of extremely red objects (EROs). An analysis of the spectral energy distributions of EROs suggests the presence of large quantities of dust, which demand gas densities in the outflow significantly higher than expected from theoretical modelling. We propose that binary interaction mechanisms that involve common envelope (CE) evolution could be a possible explanation for these peculiar stars; the CE phase is favoured by the rapid growth of the stellar radius occurring after C/O overcomes unity. Our modelling of the dust provides results consistent with the observations for mass-loss rates $\dot{M} \sim 5\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm M}_{\odot }$ yr−1, a lower limit to the rapid loss of the envelope experienced in the CE phase. We propose that EROs could possibly hide binaries with orbital periods of about days and are likely to be responsible for a large fraction of the dust production rate in galaxies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (S323) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsola De Marco ◽  
T. Reichardt ◽  
R. Iaconi ◽  
T. Hillwig ◽  
G. H. Jacoby ◽  
...  

AbstractOne in 5 PN are ejected from common envelope binary interactions butKeplerresults are already showing this proportion to be larger. Their properties, such as abundances can be starkly different from those of the general population, so they should be considered separately when using PN as chemical or population probes. Unfortunately post-common envelope PN cannot be discerned using only their morphologies, but this will change once we couple our new common envelope simulations with PN formation models.


2015 ◽  
Vol 576 ◽  
pp. L15 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Olofsson ◽  
W. H. T. Vlemmings ◽  
M. Maercker ◽  
E. M. L. Humphreys ◽  
M. Lindqvist ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 484 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Schreiber ◽  
B. T. Gänsicke ◽  
J. Southworth ◽  
A. D. Schwope ◽  
D. Koester
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document