scholarly journals Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish inventories in tropical streams and rivers

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Cantera ◽  
Kévin Cilleros ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Axel Cerdan ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Johnson ◽  
Mohamed Fokar ◽  
Robert D. Cox ◽  
Matthew A. Barnes

Abstract Background Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) research is an emerging field that focuses on the detection of species from their genetic remnants in the air. The majority of studies into airborne eDNA of plants has until now either focused on single species detection, specifically only pollen, or human health impacts, with no previous studies surveying an entire plant community through metabarcoding. We therefore conducted an airborne eDNA metabarcoding survey and compared the results to a traditional plant community survey. Results Over the course of a year, we conducted two traditional transect-based visual plant surveys alongside an airborne eDNA sampling campaign on a short-grass rangeland. We found that airborne eDNA detected more species than the traditional surveying method, although the types of species detected varied based on the method used. Airborne eDNA detected more grasses and forbs with less showy flowers, while the traditional method detected fewer grasses but also detected rarer forbs with large showy flowers. Additionally, we found the airborne eDNA metabarcoding survey required less sampling effort in terms of the time needed to conduct a survey and was able to detect more invasive species than the traditional method. Conclusions Overall, we have demonstrated that airborne eDNA can act as a sensitive and efficient plant community surveying method. Airborne eDNA surveillance has the potential to revolutionize the way plant communities are monitored in general, track changes in plant communities due to climate change and disturbances, and assist with the monitoring of invasive and endangered species.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Richey ◽  
Kirsten V. Kenelty ◽  
Kristina Van Stone Hopkins ◽  
Brittany N. Stevens ◽  
Beatriz Martínez-López ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony T. Robinson ◽  
Yvette M. Paroz ◽  
Matthew J. Clement ◽  
Thomas W. Franklin ◽  
Joseph C. Dysthe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Salter ◽  
Mourits Joensen ◽  
Regin Kristiansen ◽  
Petur Steingrund ◽  
Poul Vestergaard

AbstractEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a powerful approach for studying marine fisheries and has the potential to negate some of the drawbacks of trawl surveys. However, successful applications in oceanic waters have to date been largely focused on qualitative descriptions of species inventories. Here we conducted a quantitative eDNA survey of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in oceanic waters and compared it with results obtained from a standardized demersal trawl survey. Detection of eDNA originating from Atlantic cod was highly concordant (80%) with trawl catches. We observed significantly positive correlations between the regional integrals of Atlantic cod biomass (kg) and eDNA quantities (copies) (R2 = 0.79, P = 0.003) and between sampling effort-normalised Catch Per Unit Effort (kg hr−1) and eDNA concentrations (copies L−1) (R2 = 0.71, P = 0.008). These findings extend the potential application of environmental DNA to regional biomass assessments of commercially important fish stocks in the ocean.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 644-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy M. Ulibarri ◽  
Scott A. Bonar ◽  
Chris Rees ◽  
Jon Amberg ◽  
Bridget Ladell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1049-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Lugg ◽  
Josh Griffiths ◽  
Anthony R. Rooyen ◽  
Andrew R. Weeks ◽  
Reid Tingley

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1291-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam S. Smart ◽  
Andrew R. Weeks ◽  
Anthony R. Rooyen ◽  
Alana Moore ◽  
Michael A. McCarthy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (18) ◽  
pp. 9229-9240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Aylward ◽  
Alexis P. Sullivan ◽  
George H. Perry ◽  
Steig E. Johnson ◽  
Edward E. Louis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document