scholarly journals Epstein–Barr virus-associated B cell lymphoproliferative disease after non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Milpied ◽  
M Coste-Burel ◽  
F Accard ◽  
A Moreau ◽  
P Moreau ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3158-3158
Author(s):  
Feng Chen ◽  
Wu Depei ◽  
Tao Tao ◽  
Wei Gong ◽  
Chunmei Ye ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Reactivation of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) frequentlyoccurs after allogeneic stem cell transplantation(allo-SCT) andEBV-induced posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease(PTLD) is a potentially fatalcomplication. Our previous study showed that the cumulative incidence of EBV viremia after allo-SCT was 21.3±1.5% ( data based on 892 evaluable patients received allo-SCT from Jun 2011 through Jun 2014 at our institution). As the preemptive treatment for EBV reactivation after allo-SCT, rituximab (anti-CD20) is commonly used, but is associated with the prolonged immunedefect. The question of over-treatment of systematic rituximab has been raised and further studies investigating the minimal doses of rituximab to resolve EBV reactivation and avoid its prolonged B cell impairment are needed. The aimof this single-center study was to evaluate the strategy of weekly low-dose rituximab as the preemptive management of EBV reactivation. Methods 52 patients received allo-SCT from Mar 2014 through Mar 2015 at our institution were enrolled in a prospective study. 38 males and 14 females, median age 25 years (range, 7-57). Patients underwent transplantation for acute leukemia (n=33), CML (n=2), NHL (n=4), MDS (n=5), or SAA(n=8). The type of donors included HLA-haploidentical donors (n=41), HLA-matched unrelated donors (n=8) and HLA-identical siblings (n=3). EBV viral loads of patients were monitored by quantitative PCR for EBV DNA performed on whole-blood samples once a week after allo-SCT. EBV reactivation was defined as a single positive EBV PCR result according to institutional thresholds (above 100 copies per millitre). Eligibility included EBV reactivation and negative hepatitis B surface antigen. Rituximabwas administered weekly at the fixed dose of 100mg after a positive PCR result (>100Cop/mL) and discontinued as soon as a negative PCR result was available. The numbers of circulating CD20+ B cellsand serum gammaglobulin levels were assessed weekly during the study. Results Weekly low-dose rituximab was well tolerated without anyserious adverse event. 52 patients receiving preemptive rituximab treatment showed an 100% cumulative complete remission (CR) rate of EBV reactivation, which resulted in cessation of treatmentas per protocol after the 1st (n=25, 48.1%), 2nd (n=24, 46.1%), or 3rd (n=3, 5.8%) dose. To date, none of the patients have developedan EBV-PTLD.There was no significant persistent B cell dysfunction following weekly low-dose rituximab treatment by assessment of the numbers of circulating CD20+ B cellsand serum gammaglobulin levels. Conclusions Our weekly low-dose rituximab-based approach is a high-efficient and safe preemptive therapy for EBV reactivation after allo-SCT. Furthermore, the use of low-dose rituximab for EBV reactivation may avoid its prolonged B cell impairment due to the over-treatment of 375mg/m2 rituxima. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 972-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost W. J. van Esser ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Ellen Meijer ◽  
Hubert G. M. Niesters ◽  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
...  

Reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) may evoke a protective cellular immune response or may be complicated by the development of EBV-lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-LPD). So far, very little is known about the incidence, recurrence, and sequelae of EBV reactivation following allo-SCT. EBV reactivation was retrospectively monitored in 85 EBV-seropositive recipients of a T-cell–depleted (TCD) allo-SCT and 65 EBV-seropositive recipients of an unmanipulated allo-SCT. Viral reactivation (more than 50 EBV genome equivalents [gEq]/mL) was monitored frequently by quantitative real-time plasma polymerase chain reaction until day 180 after SCT. Probabilities of developing viral reactivation were high after both unmanipulated and TCD-allogeneic SCT (31% ± 6% versus 65% ± 7%, respectively). A high CD34+ cell number of the graft appeared as a novel significant predictor (P = .001) for EBV reactivation. Recurrent reactivation was observed more frequently in recipients of a TCD graft, and EBV-LPD occurred only after TCD-SCT. High-risk status, TCD, and use of antithymocyte globulin were predictive for developing EBV-LPD. Plasma EBV DNA quantitatively predicted EBV-LPD. The positive and negative predictive values of a viral load of 1000 gEq/mL were, respectively, 39% and 100% after TCD. Treatment-related mortality did not differ significantly between TCD and non-TCD transplants, but the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was significantly less in TCD patients. It is concluded that EBV reactivation occurs frequently after TCD and unmanipulated allo-SCT, especially in recipients of grafts with high CD34+ cell counts. EBV-LPD, however, occurred only after TCD, and EBV load quantitatively predicted EBV-LPD in recipients of a TCD graft.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document