The robustness of mean and variance approximations in risk analysis

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Johnson
2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Chadwell-Hatfield ◽  
Bernard Goitein ◽  
Philip Horvath ◽  
Allen Webster

This study examines the impact that capital budgeting considerations has on the average values of various performance measures for a sample of 118 U.S. manufacturing firms. This study also examines whether the variance of performance measures are affected by differing capital budgeting considerations. Results are analyzed with non-paramentric tests for mean and variance differences. The results of this study provide mixed support for conventional financial theory and a sound basis for further investigation into current capital budgeting practices.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Schönebeck ◽  
B Reiter ◽  
O Haye ◽  
D Böhm ◽  
M Ismail ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 60-77
Author(s):  
E. V. Vasilieva ◽  
T. V. Gaibova

This paper describes the method of project risk analysis based on design thinking and explores the possibility of its application for industrial investment projects. Traditional and suggested approaches to project risk management have been compared. Several risk analysis artifacts have been added to the standard list of artifacts. An iterative procedure for the formation of risk analysis artifacts has been developed, with the purpose of integrating the risk management process into strategic and prompt decision-making during project management. A list of tools at each stage of design thinking for risk management within the framework of real investment projects has been proposed. The suggested technology helps to determine project objectives and content and adapt them in regards to possible; as well as to implement measures aimed at reducing these risks, to increase productivity of the existing risk assessment and risk management tools, to organize effective cooperation between project team members, and to promote accumulation of knowledge about the project during its development and implementation.The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1988 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-267
Author(s):  
Kazuo Takaragi ◽  
Ryoichi Sasaki ◽  
Yasuhiko Nagai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document