A silk-based high impact composite for the core decompression of the femoral head

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (42) ◽  
pp. 9734-9743
Author(s):  
Jin Wang ◽  
Ruixin Mi ◽  
Guanglei Zhao ◽  
Jingsheng Shi ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
...  

A novel silk based composite as a filling material in core decompression of the femoral head for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Han ◽  
Fuqiang Gao ◽  
Yajia Li ◽  
Jinhui Ma ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
...  

Background. As a pathological process, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is characterized by the avascularity of the femoral head, cellular necrosis, microfracture, and the collapse of the articular surface. Currently, critical treatment for early-stage ONFH is limited to core decompression. However, the efficacy of core decompression remains controversial. To improve the core decompression efficacy, regenerative techniques such as the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were proposed for early-stage ONFH. As a type of autologous plasma containing concentrations of platelets greater than the baseline, PRP plays an important role in tissue repair, regeneration, and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the operation modes, mechanism, and efficacy of PRP for early-stage ONFH treatment. Methods. We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. By searching these electronic databases, the identification of either clinical or experimental studies evaluating PRP, MSC, core decompression, and ONFH was our goal. Results. Seventeen studies of PRP and avascular necrosis of the femoral head were evaluated in our review. Ten studies related to the possible mechanism of PRP for treating ONFH were reviewed. Seven studies of the operation modes of PRP in treating ONFH were identified. We reviewed the efficacy of PRP in treating ONFH systematically and made an attempt to compare the PRP operation modes in 7 studies and other operation modes in past studies for early-stage ONFH treatment. Conclusion. PRP treats ONFH mainly through three mechanisms: inducing angiogenesis and osteogenesis to accelerate bone healing, inhibiting inflammatory reactions in necrotic lesions, and preventing apoptosis induced by glucocorticoids. In addition, as an adjunctive therapy for core decompression, the use of PRP is recommended to improve the treatment of early-stage ONFH patients, especially when combined with stem cells and bone grafts, by inducing osteogenic activity and stimulating the differentiation of stem cells in necrotic lesions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju’an Yue ◽  
Xiaozhong Guo ◽  
Randong Wang ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Qiang Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundTo report the outcomes of the single approach to double-channel core decompression and bone grafting with structural bone support (SDBS) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and define the indications.MethodsOne-hundred-and-thirty-nine hips in 96 patients (79 males, 17 females; mean age 37.53±10.31 years, range 14–58 years; mean body mass index 25.15±3.63 kg/m2) were retrospectively analysed. The Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess hip function, and radiographs were used to assess the depth of femoral head collapse. Treatment failure was defined as the performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The variables assessed as potential risk factors for surgical failure were: aetiology, Japanese Osteonecrosis Investigation Committee (JIC) type, age, and Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage. Complications were recorded.ResultsThe HHS increased from 79.00±13.61 preoperatively to 82.01±17.29 at final follow-up (P=0.041). The average HHS improvement was 3.00±21.86. The combined excellent and good rate at final follow-up (65.6%) was significantly higher than that before surgery (34.5%) (P=0.000). On radiographic evaluation, 103 (74.1%) hips remained stable, while 36 (25.9%) had femoral head collapse or aggravation of ONFH. THA was performed in 18 hips. Thus, the overall femoral head survival rate was 87.05% (121/139). The success rate was adversely affected by JIC type, but not by aetiology, age, or ARCO stage. The only complication was a subtrochanteric fracture in one patient.ConclusionThe SDBS effectively delays or even terminates the progression of ONFH, especially type B and C1. The SDBS is a good option for early-stage ONFH.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Han ◽  
Fuqiang Gao ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Lijun Shi ◽  
Xinjie Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: As a pathological process, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is characterized by the avascularity of the femoral head, cellular necrosis, microfracture, and the collapse of the articular surface. Currently, critical treatment for early stage ONFH is limited to core decompression. However, the efficacy of core decompression remains controversial. To improve the core decompression efficacy, regenerative techniques such as the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were proposed for early stage ONFH. As a type of autologous plasma containing concentrations of platelets greater than the baseline, PRP plays an important role in tissue repair, regeneration, and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the operation modes, mechanism and efficacy of PRP for early stage ONFH treatment. Methods: We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. By searching these electronic databases, the identification of either clinical or experimental studies evaluating PRP, MSC, core decompression and ONFH was our goal. Results: Seventeen studies of PRP and avascular necrosis of the femoral head were evaluated in our review. Ten studies related to the possible mechanism of PRP for treating ONFH were reviewed. Seven studies of the operation modes of PRP in treating ONFH were identified. We reviewed the efficacy of PRP in treating ONFH systematically and made an attempt to compare the PRP operation modes in 7 studies and other operation modes in past studies for early stage ONFH treatment. Conclusion: PRP treats ONFH mainly through three mechanisms: inducing angiogenesis and osteogenesis to accelerate bone healing; inhibiting inflammatory reactions in necrotic lesions; and preventing apoptosis induced by glucocorticoids. In addition, as an adjunctive therapy for core decompression, the use of PRP is recommended to improve the treatment of early stage ONFH patients, especially when combined with stem cells and bone grafts, by inducing osteogenic activity and stimulating the differentiation of stem cells in necrotic lesions.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2108-2108
Author(s):  
Austin Cail ◽  
Kavita Natrajan ◽  
Nadine Barrett ◽  
Latanya Bowman ◽  
Betsy Clair ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2108 Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a common complication of sickle cell disease (SCD) and is estimated to occur in approximately 50% of patients with SCD by age 35. AVN is associated with significant morbidity including debilitating pain and disability. Total hip replacement (THR) is a common intervention for AVN; however, complications of hip replacement such as infections, bone fractures, prolonged healing times, and the need for subsequent revisions begs for an alternate intervention in the young SCD patient population. Core decompression is one such intervention but there has not been a common consensus on its efficacy and few studies have analyzed its role in SCD associated AVN. Our retrospective study analyzes the long term outcomes of core decompression in SCD patients. Records of 100 patients with AVN followed at the Adult Sickle Cell Clinic at Georgia Health Sciences University were reviewed. Twenty-three patients (30 hips) had core decompression (13 female, 10 male). Of these, 21 were Hb SS, 1 was Hb Sβ+ Thalassemia, and 1 was Sβ° Thalassemia. Patient demographics, age at diagnosis, Ficat stage at diagnosis, age at core, Ficat stage at core, symptom relief, THR, time to THR, and duration of follow up were recorded. The age of the patients at the time of the coring procedure ranged from 18–42 years, with a mean age (±SD) of 26.2 ±6.6. Patients had a mean (±SD) follow up period of 10.0±7.2 years after the core decompression. At the time of coring, 6 hips were stage I (x-ray normal, MRI abnormal), 20 hips were stage II (sclerosis and lytic areas on x-ray), 3 hips were stage III (femoral head flattening and crescent sign), and 1 hip did not have data available. 23/29 (79%) hips had symptom relief. Of these, 5/6 stage I, 16/19 stage II (1 hip was only 1 month post-op so was not included), 1/3 stage III, and 1/1 for the hip without the stage information available. Two of these hips that had symptom relief did eventually have THR (71 and 157 months after core). Five of these hips underwent re-coring procedures (4, 6, 6, 7, and 13 years after 1st core) and none of these went on to THR. Of the 6/29 hips that had no relief from the core, 4 went on to THR (range 5–20 months, mean=11.5± 7.2 months median=10.5 months) and 2 have been advised of the need for THR and/or are currently considering it (both currently stage IV). Including the 2 hips that were determined to be successful in relieving symptoms that had THR, there were 6/29 hips that had THR, and the time to THR ranged from 5–157 months, mean=45.7±59.8 months, median= 17.5 months. Our data suggests that core decompression is a practical option for SCD patients with early stage AVN of the femoral head. If our results pan out across multiple Sickle Cell Centers, core decompression can provide significant pain relief and delay the need of THR greatly reducing morbidity from chronic pain and improving functional outcomes. Our data, however, are contrary to the results of a multi-center study of core decompression which compared physical therapy and core decompression to physical therapy alone in 35 patients with SCD in which the follow-up period was only three years. In contrast, the strength of our study is the mean follow-up of ten years. Age range of patients from our study did not differ from that of the multicenter study. Data collection on a larger number of patients from multiple centers, perhaps in the form of a registry or a randomized trial with adequate number of patients to answer the question of the value of core decompression in SCD might be informative in this regard. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Alfonso Guzman ◽  
Masahiro Maruyama ◽  
Seyedsina Moeinzadeh ◽  
Elaine Lui ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Approximately one third of patients undergoing core decompression (CD) for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) experience progression of the disease, and subsequently require total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thus, identifying adjunctive treatments to optimize bone regeneration during CD is an unmet clinical need. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB plays a central role in cell growth and differentiation. The aim of this study was to characterize mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) that were genetically modified to overexpress PDGF-BB (PDGF-BB-MSCs) in vitro and evaluate their therapeutic effect when injected into the bone tunnel at the time of CD in an in vivo rabbit model of steroid-associated ONFH. Methods In vitro studies: Rabbit MSCs were transduced with a lentivirus vector carrying the human PDGF-BB gene under the control of either the cytomegalovirus (CMV) or phosphoglycerate (PGK) promoter. The proliferative rate, PDGF-BB expression level, and osteogenic differentiation capacity of unmodified MSCs, CMV-PDGF-BB-MSCs, and PGK-PDGF-BB-MSCs were assessed. In vivo studies: Twenty-four male New Zealand white rabbits received an intramuscular (IM) injection of methylprednisolone 20 mg/kg. Four weeks later, the rabbits were divided into four groups: the CD group, the hydrogel [HG, (a collagen-alginate mixture)] group, the MSC group, and the PGK-PDGF-BB-MSC group. Eight weeks later, the rabbits were sacrificed, their femurs were harvested, and microCT, mechanical testing, and histological analyses were performed. Results In vitro studies: PGK-PDGF-BB-MSCs proliferated more rapidly than unmodified MSCs (P < 0.001) and CMV-PDGF-BB-MSCs (P < 0.05) at days 3 and 7. CMV-PDGF-BB-MSCs demonstrated greater PDGF-BB expression than PGK-PDGF-BB-MSCs (P < 0.01). However, PGK-PDGF-BB-MSCs exhibited greater alkaline phosphatase staining at 14 days (P < 0.01), and osteogenic differentiation at 28 days (P = 0.07) than CMV-PDGF-BB-MSCs. In vivo: The PGK-PDGF-BB-MSC group had a trend towards greater bone mineral density (BMD) than the CD group (P = 0.074). The PGK-PDGF-BB-MSC group demonstrated significantly lower numbers of empty lacunae (P < 0.001), greater osteoclast density (P < 0.01), and greater angiogenesis (P < 0.01) than the other treatment groups. Conclusion The use of PGK-PDGF-BB-MSCs as an adjunctive treatment with CD may reduce progression of osteonecrosis and enhance bone regeneration and angiogenesis in the treatment of early-stage ONFH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document