Impact of age on the vasovagal response provoked by sublingual nitroglycerine in routine tilt testing

2007 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Verheyden ◽  
Janneke Gisolf ◽  
Frank Beckers ◽  
John M. Karemaker ◽  
Karel H. Wesseling ◽  
...  

NTG (nitroglycerine) is used in routine tilt testing to elicit a vasovagal response. In the present study we hypothesized that with increasing age NTG triggers a more gradual BP (blood pressure) decline due to a diminished baroreflex-buffering capacity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of NTG on baroreflex control of BP in patients with distinct age-related vasovagal collapse patterns. The study groups consisted of 29 patients (16–71 years old, 17 females) with clinically suspected VVS (vasovagal syncope) and a positive tilt test. Mean FAP (finger arterial pressure) was monitored continuously (Finapres). Left ventricular SV (stroke volume), CO (cardiac output) and SVR (systemic vascular resistance) were computed from the pressure pulsations (Modelflow). BRS (baroreflex sensitivity) was estimated in the time domain. In the first 3 min after NTG administration, BP was well-maintained in all patients. This implied an adequate arterial resistance response to compensate for steeper reductions in SV and CO with increasing age. HR (heart rate) increased and the BRS decreased after NTG administration. The rate of mean FAP fall leading to presyncope was inversely related to age (r=0.51, P=0.005). Accordingly, patients with a mean FAP fall >1.44 mmHg/s (median) were generally younger compared with patients with a slower mean FAP-fall (30±10 years compared with 51±17 years; P=0.001). The main determinant of the rate of BP fall on approach of presyncope was the rate of fall in HR (r=0.75, P<0.001). It was concluded that, in older patients, sublingual NTG provokes a more gradual BP decline compared with younger patients. This gradual decline cannot be ascribed to failure of the baroreflex-buffering capacity with increasing age. Age-related differences in the laboratory presentation of a vasovagal episode depend on the magnitude of the underlying bradycardic response.

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Rivasi ◽  
Parisa Torabi ◽  
Gianmarco Secco ◽  
Andrea Ungar ◽  
Richard Sutton ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Tilt testing (TT) is recognized to be a valuable contribution to the diagnosis and the pathophysiology of vasovagal syncope (VVS). This study aimed to assess the influence of age on TT responses by examination of a large patient cohort. Methods and results Retrospective data from three experienced European Syncope Units were merged to include 5236 patients investigated for suspected VVS by the Italian TT protocol. Tilt testing-positivity rates and haemodynamics were analysed across age-decade subgroups. Of 5236 investigated patients, 3129 (60%) had a positive TT. Cardioinhibitory responses accounted for 16.5% of positive tests and were more common in younger patients, decreasing from the age of 50–59 years. Vasodepressor (VD) responses accounted for 24.4% of positive tests and prevailed in older patients, starting from the age of 50–59. Mixed responses (59.1% of cases) declined slightly with increasing age. Overall, TT positivity showed a similar age-related trend (P = 0.0001) and was significantly related to baseline systolic blood pressure (P &lt; 0.001). Tilt testing was positive during passive phase in 18% and during nitroglycerine (TNG)-potentiated phase in 82% of cases. Positivity rate of passive phase declined with age (P = 0.001), whereas positivity rate during TNG remained quite stable. The prevalence of cardioinhibitory and VD responses was similar during passive and TNG-potentiated TT, when age-adjusted. Conclusions Age significantly impacts the haemodynamic pattern of TT responses, starting from the age of 50. Conversely, TT phase—passive or TNG-potentiated—does not significantly influence the type of response, when age-adjusted. Vagal hyperactivity dominates in younger patients, older patients show tendency to vasodepression.


2004 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco PICCIRILLO ◽  
Camilla NASO ◽  
Antonio MOISÈ ◽  
Marco LIONETTI ◽  
Marialuce NOCCO ◽  
...  

Autonomic nervous system control in subjects with vasovagal syncope is controversial. In the present study, we used short-term spectral analysis to evaluate autonomic control in subjects with recurrent vasovagal syncope. We assessed the ability of spectral indices of HR (heart rate) variability to predict tilt-test responses. A series of 47 outpatients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and with positive responses to head-up tilt testing underwent a further study of RR variability during controlled breathing at rest and during tilt testing. During controlled breathing, RR interval variability of total power (TPRR; P<0.001), low-frequency power (LFRR; P<0.05), high-frequency power (HFRR; P<0.001) and HF expressed in normalized units (HFnuRR; P<0.001) were all higher, and LF expressed in normalized units (LFnuRR) and LF/HF ratio were lower in subjects with vasovagal syncope than in controls (P<0.001). To assess the ability of spectral components of RR variability to predict tilt-test responses, we prospectively studied 109 subjects with recurrent vasovagal syncope. The two normalized measures, HFnuRR and LFnuRR, determined during controlled breathing alone predicted a positive tilt-test response (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 99%; positive predictive value, 96%; and negative predictive value, 90%). During tilting, subjects with vasovagal syncope had lower SBP (systolic blood pressure; P<0.05), LF component of peak SBP variability (LFSBP) and LFnuRR than controls, and higher TPRR, HFRR, HFnuRR and α HF (P<0.001). These spectral data indicate that vagal sinus modulation is increased at rest in subjects with vasovagal syncope. Spectral analysis of RR variability during controlled breathing, a procedure that predicts tilt-test responses, could be a useful guide in choosing the method of tilt testing.


EP Europace ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S5-S5
Author(s):  
J GUZMAN ◽  
R DILLENBURG ◽  
S CONNOLLY ◽  
C MORILLO

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document