The Production of Gesture and Speech by People With Aphasia: Influence of Communicative Constraints

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 4417-4432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carola de Beer ◽  
Jan P. de Ruiter ◽  
Martina Hielscher-Fastabend ◽  
Katharina Hogrefe

Purpose People with aphasia (PWA) use different kinds of gesture spontaneously when they communicate. Although there is evidence that the nature of the communicative task influences the linguistic performance of PWA, so far little is known about the influence of the communicative task on the production of gestures by PWA. We aimed to investigate the influence of varying communicative constraints on the production of gesture and spoken expression by PWA in comparison to persons without language impairment. Method Twenty-six PWA with varying aphasia severities and 26 control participants (CP) without language impairment participated in the study. Spoken expression and gesture production were investigated in 2 different tasks: (a) spontaneous conversation about topics of daily living and (b) a cartoon narration task, that is, retellings of short cartoon clips. The frequencies of words and gestures as well as of different gesture types produced by the participants were analyzed and tested for potential effects of group and task. Results Main results for task effects revealed that PWA and CP used more iconic gestures and pantomimes in the cartoon narration task than in spontaneous conversation. Metaphoric gestures, deictic gestures, number gestures, and emblems were more frequently used in spontaneous conversation than in cartoon narrations by both participant groups. Group effects show that, in both tasks, PWA's gesture-to-word ratios were higher than those for the CP. Furthermore, PWA produced more interactive gestures than the CP in both tasks, as well as more number gestures and pantomimes in spontaneous conversation. Conclusions The current results suggest that PWA use gestures to compensate for their verbal limitations under varying communicative constraints. The properties of the communicative task influence the use of different gesture types in people with and without aphasia. Thus, the influence of communicative constraints needs to be considered when assessing PWA's multimodal communicative abilities.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansika Kapoor ◽  
Azizuddin Khan
Keyword(s):  

Aphasiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-118
Author(s):  
Susan Edwards ◽  
Christos Salis

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 116-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Salis ◽  
Susan Edwards

Author(s):  
Bruce N. Walker ◽  
Jeffrey Lindsay

If it is not possible to use vision when navigating through one's surroundings, moving safely and effectively becomes much harder. In such cases, non-speech audio cues can serve as navigation beacons, as well as denote features in the environment relevant to the user. This paper outlines and summarizes the development and evaluation of a System for Wearable Audio Navigation (SWAN), including an overview of completed, ongoing, and future research relating to the sounds used, the human-system interaction, output hardware, divided attention, and task effects.


1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Kurt Kraetschmer

The paper discusses problems encountered in counseling and rehabilitating the client who suffers from a speech-language impairment which limits his communicative abilities and skills. The first part addresses questions germane to family counseling and provides insight into the problem of adequate environment for speech-language therapy. The second part propounds a classification of various speech-langulfge disorders which are frequently encountered in the clinical practice. It also describes the characteristic features of these disorders and appropriate intervention strategies. The last part presents two case studies from the clinical practice to show the results of an integrative approach to the rehabilitation of the speech-language impaired client.


1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walton T. Roth ◽  
Karen H. Dorato ◽  
Bert S. Kopell

1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wogan ◽  
Charles D. Kaplan ◽  
Samuel F. Moore ◽  
Richard Epro ◽  
Richard N. Harner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document