Effects of Conductive Hearing Loss

1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ira M. Ventry

This paper reviews the empirical evidence implicating conductive hearing impairment as a causal agent in learning disability, language dysfunction, and central auditory problems. From this review one can conclude that there are few, if any, valid data linking conductive hearing impairment to any of these problems. Suggestions for improving research in this area conclude the article.

1988 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Majima ◽  
Kazuhiko Takeuchi ◽  
Yukiyoshi Hamaguchi ◽  
Atsuhito Morishita ◽  
Keisuke Hirata ◽  
...  

Both dynamic viscosity (n′) and elasticity (G′) of middle ear effusion were measured with an oscillating sphere magnetic rheometer and compared with the degree of conductive hearing loss in 65 ears of 40 children. There was a significant correlation between n′ and the magnitude of the air-bone gap at 500 and 1,000 Hz, but there was no significant correlation between G′ and the magnitude of the air-bone gap at 2,000 or 4,000 Hz. No significant correlation was noted between G′ and the magnitude of the air-bone gap at 500,1,000, 2,000, or 4,000 Hz. These results indicate that the n′ of middle ear effusion has an effect on the amount of hearing impairment at frequencies below 1,000 Hz.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1035
Author(s):  
Lok-Yee Joyce Li ◽  
Shin-Yi Wang ◽  
Jinn-Moon Yang ◽  
Chih-Jou Chen ◽  
Cheng-Yu Tsai ◽  
...  

Hearing impairment is a frequent human sensory impairment. It was estimated that over 50% of those aged >75 years experience hearing impairment in the United States. Several hearing impairment–related factors are detectable through screening; thus, further deterioration can be avoided. Early identification of hearing impairment is the key to effective management. However, hearing screening resources are scarce or inaccessible, underlining the importance of developing user-friendly mobile health care systems for universal hearing screening. Mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) act as platforms for personalized hearing screening to evaluate an individual’s risk of developing hearing impairment. We aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of smartphone-based air conduction and bone conduction audiometry self-tests with that of standard air conduction and bone conduction pure-tone audiometry tests. Moreover, we evaluated the use of smartphone-based air conduction and bone conduction audiometry self-tests in conductive hearing loss diagnosis. We recruited 103 patients (206 ears) from an otology clinic. All patients were aged ≥20 years. Patients who were diagnosed with active otorrhea was excluded. Moderate hearing impairment was defined as hearing loss with mean hearing thresholds >40 dB. All patients underwent four hearing tests performed by a board-certified audiologist: a smartphone-based air conduction audiometry self-test, smartphone-based bone conduction audiometry self-test, standard air-conduction pure-tone audiometry, and standard bone conduction pure-tone audiometry. We compared and analyzed the results of the smartphone-based air conduction and bone conduction audiometry self-tests with those of the standard air conduction and bone conduction pure-tone audiometry tests. The sensitivity of the smartphone-based air conduction audiometry self-test was 0.80 (95% confidence interval CI = 0.71–0.88) and its specificity was 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76–0.90), respectively. The sensitivity of the smartphone-based bone conduction audiometry self-test was 0.64 (95% CI = 0.53–0.75) and its specificity was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.62–0.78). Among all the ears, 24 were diagnosed with conductive hearing loss. The smartphone-based audiometry self-tests correctly diagnosed conductive hearing loss in 17 of those ears. The personalized smartphone-based audiometry self-tests correctly diagnosed hearing loss with high sensitivity and high specificity, and they can be a reliable screening test to rule out moderate hearing impairment among the population. It provided patients with moderate hearing impairment with personalized strategies for symptomatic control and facilitated individual case management for medical practitioners.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-76
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahabubul Alam Chowdhury ◽  
Kamrul Hassan Tarafder ◽  
Pran Gopal Datta ◽  
Mostafa Zaman ◽  
Nasima Akhtar ◽  
...  

Background : Hearing impairment is one of the leading causes of disability in Bangladesh. Since half the cases can be prevented through public awareness, early detection and timely management, planning of public health interventions become necessary. To achieve this, a nationwide level of evidence is required. This survey was conducted with the aim of determining the prevalence of hearing impairment in Bangladesh. Materials and methods : The study was a cross-sectional one, conducted between January to May 2013, where a multistage, geographically clustered sampling approach was used. A total of 52 primary sampling units were selected, and from each unit households were selected at random followed by random selection of an individual from each household. In total, 5,220 people were targeted out of which data collection could be completed from 4260 individuals. (82%). Following clinical assessment of study subjects, hearing status was assessed by pure tone audiometry and otoacoustic emission test. Results : The mean age was 32 years among which 58% were females. Among men, there were 29% students, 28% agriculture workers and 14% business men. A major portion of females (63%) were home makers. On clinical examination, 11.5% respondents had impacted ear wax, 6.2% had chronic middle ear infections with eardrum perforation, and 5.3% had otitis media with effusion.On hearing assessment, 34.6% respondents had some form of hearing loss (>25dB in better ear). Conductive hearing loss was found in 12.0%, sensorineural in 4.5% and mixed in 3.8%, where the latter two increased in prevalence with age. Out of the total respondents, 9.6% had disabling hearing loss according to WHO criteria, with a higher prevalence in adults > 60 years(37%). Logistic regression analysis showed age, socioeconomic status, presence of ear wax, chronic suppurative otitis media, otitis media with effusion and otitis externa were significant predictors of disabling hearing loss. Conclusion : The major causes of conductive hearing loss are chronic suppurative otitis media and otitis media with effusion. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.20 (1); January 2021; Page 72-76


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1311-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Allison Moore

The purpose of the study was to investigate the relative contributions of age, gender, ethnic background, and a history of middle ear disease on the amount of conductive hearing impairment among native and non-native audiology patients in the Canadian North. A second goal of the study was to determine risk factors for conductive hearing loss in the patients studied. Three ethnic groups were represented among the 3,094 patients: Inuit, American Indian, and non-native. Loglinear and logit statistical models were applied, and these data were best explained by a 3-way interaction of history of middle ear disease, ethnic group, and hearing loss, and the 2-way interaction of age and hearing loss. The Inuit appear to be at higher risk for conductive hearing impairment than the other ethnic groups. Conductive hearing loss also appears to increase as age increases through the teenage years for all the patients regardless of ethnic group membership. Preschoolers were at the lowest risk for conductive hearing loss. The trend for the amount of hearing impairment to increase throughout childhood suggests that children living in the Arctic may manifest a unique and more serious form of the disease not often observed in audiology patients who are Caucasian in southern Canada or the United States or that they may be exposed to additional risk factors.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 8704-8711 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Moore ◽  
Jemma E. Hine ◽  
Ze Dong Jiang ◽  
Hiroaki Matsuda ◽  
Carl H. Parsons ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1280-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Lee ◽  
S H Jung ◽  
H C Kim ◽  
C H Park ◽  
S M Hong

AbstractObjective:We report three generations of one family suffering from bilateral conductive hearing loss due to a congenital anomaly of the incus and stapes fixation.Case report:All three female patients presented with similar symptoms and findings of hearing impairment since birth. Their computed tomography findings were the same. An abnormally shaped incus, fixed stapes and hanging tympanic portion of the facial nerve were seen at surgery. Stapedotomy could not be performed because the hanging facial nerve blocked the operating field.Conclusion:Although several cases of familial ossicular anomaly have been reported, this is the first report of an incus anomaly and stapes fixation combined with a facial nerve anomaly.


2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S3) ◽  
pp. S188-S188
Author(s):  
Pieter Kemp ◽  
Jiska van Stralen ◽  
Pim de Graaf ◽  
Erwin Berkhout ◽  
Jan Wolff ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 826-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rik C. Nelissen ◽  
Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus ◽  
Cor W. R. J. Cremers ◽  
Myrthe K. S. Hol ◽  
Ad F. M. Snik

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 030006052097228
Author(s):  
Yujie Liu ◽  
Ran Ren ◽  
Shouqin Zhao

The Bonebridge and Vibrant Soundbridge systems are semi-implanted hearing devices, which have been widely applied in patients with congenital conductive hearing loss. However, comparison between these two hearing devices is rare, especially in the same patient. We report a 23-year-old man who underwent successive implantation of Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge devices in the same ear because of dysfunction of the Vibrant Soundbridge. We provide insight on the patient’s experience and compare the audiological and subjective outcomes of satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document