Benefits of a Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Team: Acute Care Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (13) ◽  
pp. 89-100
Author(s):  
Carmin Bartow ◽  
Nina Collins ◽  
Eugene Kopp ◽  
Oscar Guillamondegui
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 44-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Petry ◽  
Jutta Ernst ◽  
Corinne Steinbrüchel-Boesch ◽  
Jeanine Altherr ◽  
Rahel Naef

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-412
Author(s):  
Mitzi M. Saunders

Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in the United States are trained to diagnose and treat disease and illness, hence, to prescribe. Of the APRN roles, the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) is the least likely to prescribe. Prescribing is one of many advanced care interventions performed by CNSs, but the statutes regarding prescriptive authority are constantly changing. The purpose of this article is to inform and support the new CNS prescriber. The article reviews CNS prescribing, credentialing and privileging, safety strategies, and educational considerations that influence CNS prescribing and offers current recommendations for new CNS prescribers. Clinical nurse specialist prescribing can enhance the patient care experience and fill unmet prescriptive needs for patients. Overall, more reports on the outcomes of CNS prescribing are urgently needed, specifically, publications on CNS prescribing in acute care, where most CNSs practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1137-1144
Author(s):  
Ashleigh L. Barrickman ◽  
Megan Adelman ◽  
Gretchen K. Garofoli ◽  
Jay L. Martello ◽  
Casey Bardsley ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Braithwaite

Stakeholders in acute care experience problems at various levels and in many places. Numerous critics have pointed to flaws in the system such as fragmentation, structural deficiencies, lack of clinical governance, insufficient resources, serendipitous rather than planned outcomes, poor systems and neglect of health promotion, prevention and education, to mention only some.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e0159799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine M. Naylor ◽  
Joseph Descallar ◽  
Mechteld Grootemaat ◽  
Helen Badge ◽  
Ian A. Harris ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1017-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Hurtig ◽  
Rebecca M. Alper ◽  
Karen N. T. Bryant ◽  
Krista R. Davidson ◽  
Chelsea Bilskemper

Purpose Many hospitalized patients experience barriers to effective patient–provider communication that can negatively impact their care. These barriers include difficulty physically accessing the nurse call system, communicating about pain and other needs, or both. For many patients, these barriers are a result of their admitting condition and not of an underlying chronic disability. Speech-language pathologists have begun to address patients' short-term communication needs with an array of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies. Method This study used a between-groups experimental design to evaluate the impact of providing patients with AAC systems so that they could summon help and communicate with their nurses. The study examined patients' and nurses' perceptions of the patients' ability to summon help and effectively communicate with caregivers. Results Patients who could summon their nurses and effectively communicate—with or without AAC—had significantly more favorable perceptions than those who could not. Conclusions This study suggests that AAC can be successfully used in acute care settings to help patients overcome access and communication barriers. Working with other members of the health care team is essential to building a “culture of communication” in acute care settings. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9990962


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document