Effectiveness of local anaesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan A McNab ◽  
Richard J Simmie
Keyword(s):  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Role of anaesthesia in endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy: A meta-analysis of 3282 cases

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110356
Author(s):  
Alessandro Vinciguerra ◽  
Alessandro Nonis ◽  
Antonio Giordano Resti ◽  
Mohammad Javed Ali ◽  
Mario Bussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Full Text Review ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Type Of Anaesthesia

Distal acquired lacrimal obstruction is a common adulthood pathology whose primary treatment is represented by EXT-DCR and END-DCR. When considering their influencing factors, the role of the type of anaesthesia applied during these surgeries has a major role. The aim of this study is to systematically analyse the influence of general and local/regional anaesthesia on the final success rates of EXT-DCR and END-DCR. Primary EXT-DCR and END-DCR articles published later than 2000 with at least 50 single clinician procedures were selected. Exclusion criteria included acute dacryocystitis, tumours, studies focussing on revision surgeries, surgeries with adjunctive procedures, not clearly demarcated surgeons, mixed cohort study of acquired and congenital disorders. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with MOOSE guidelines; where feasible, a meta-analysis of the collected results was conducted. As a result, 11,445 articles were selected of which 2741 were examined after screening, and 16 included after full text review (0.6% of the initial papers). Among all papers included, the number of EXT-DCR was not enough to provide a solid analysis of the effect of anaesthesia; conversely, a significant difference of success rate was noted between local anaesthesia + sedation (85.1%, IC 77.8%–90.4%), and general anaesthesia (90.8%, IC 88.8%–92.4%) in END-DCR ( p = 0.048). In conclusion, END-DCR performed with general anaesthesia should be considered as the solution of choice; however, local anaesthesia, eventually associated with a sedation, can be used as an alternative in selected cases. No meaningful conclusions could be drawn for EXT-DCR, due to the lack of data.

scholarly journals Randomised, masked study of local anaesthesia administered prior to external dacryocystorhinostomy under general anaesthesia

Eye ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Scawn ◽  
Matthew J. Allen ◽  
Geoffrey E. Rose ◽  
David H. Verity
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Cost-efficiency of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 476-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Anari ◽  
G Ainsworth ◽  
A K Robson
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Lower Success Rate ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Reference Cost

AbstractBackground:In most centres in the United Kingdom, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is currently undertaken as a joint operation between ophthalmologists and otolaryngologists. The addition of an extra surgeon, the use of endoscopic equipment and the relatively lower success rate of this procedure made us compare endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy with regards to costs and income for our hospital.Methods:All 38 primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy cases performed in our centre in 2001–2003 were retrospectively compared with the 49 external dacryocystorhinostomy cases performed in 1993–2000. Cost–income calculations were made based on: rate of local anaesthesia, success rate, rate of day case admission, hospital reference cost for dacryocystorhinostomy, and the income per case extracted from national tariffs (based on the Health Resources Group). Also, the average number of cases per session was used to calculate the income gained per session for each method.Results:The following rates between the endoscopic and the external dacryocystorhinostomy were found: local anaesthesia, 29 vs 6 per cent, respectively; day-case operation, 95 vs 12 per cent, respectively; and success rate, 87 vs 94 per cent, respectively. The average number of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy cases conducted in a single theatre session was twice that of external dacryocystorhinostomy cases. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy generated approximately twice the income of external dacryocystorhinostomy (£6585 vs £3292, respectively).Conclusion:Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is more cost-effective than external dacryocystorhinostomy, despite having a lower success rate and greater usage of resources, as the endoscopic procedure generates more income. This is mainly due to the higher number of cases per session and the higher rates of local anaesthesia and day case operations possible.

Outcome of carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia with respect to the patients’ risk profile

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksic ◽  
Luebke ◽  
Brunkwall
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Hostile Neck ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting

Background: In the present study the perioperative complication rate is compared between high- and low-risk patients when carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is routinely performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Patients and methods: From January 2000 through June 2008 1220 consecutive patients underwent CEA under LA. High-risk patients fulfilled at least one of the following characteristics: ASA 4 classification, “hostile neck”, recurrent ICA stenosis, contralateral ICA occlusion, age ≥ 80 years. The combined complication rate comprised any new neurological deficit (TIA or stroke), myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after CEA, which was compared between patient groups. Results: Overall 309 patients (25%) were attributed to the high-risk group, which differed significantly regarding sex distribution (more males: 70% vs. 63%, p = 0,011), neurological presentation (more asymptomatic: 72% vs. 62%, p = 0,001) and shunt necessity (33% vs. 14%, p < 0,001). In 32 patients 17 TIAs and 15 strokes were observed. In 3 patients a myocardial infarction occurred. Death occurred in one patient following a stroke and in another patient following myocardial infarction, leading to a combined complication rate of 2,9% (35/1220). In the multivariate analysis only previous neurological symptomatology (OR 2,85, 95% CI 1,38-5,91) and intraoperative shunting (OR 5,57, 95% CI 2,69-11,55) were identified as independent risk factors for an increased combined complication rate. Conclusions: With the routine use of LA, CEA was not associated with worse outcome in high-risk patients. Considering the data reported in the literature, it does not appear justified to refer high-risk patients principally to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) when LA can be chosen to perform CEA.

Carotid endarterectomy in patients with foetal-type posterior circle of Willis: Is there an indication for local anaesthesia?

VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-407
Author(s):  
Maras ◽  
Tzormpatzoglou ◽  
Papas ◽  
Papanas ◽  
Kotsikoris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Anatomical Variation ◽  
Anatomical Variations ◽  
Circle Of Willis ◽  
Variable Degree ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ica Stenosis ◽  
Symptomatic Stenosis

Foetal-type posterior circle of Willis is a common anatomical variation with a variable degree of vessel asymmetry. In patients with this abnormality, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may create cerebral hypo-perfusion intraoperatively, and this may be underestimated under general anaesthesia. There is currently no evidence that anatomical variations in the circle of Willis represent an independent risk factor for stroke. Moreover, there is a paucity of data on treating patients with such anatomical variations and co-existing ICA stenosis. We present a case of CEA under local anaesthesia (LA) in a 52-year-old female patient with symptomatic stenosis of the right ICA and coexistent foetal-type posterior circle of Willis. There were no post-operative complications and she was discharged free from symptoms. She was seen again 3 months later and was free from complications. This case higlights that LA should be strongly considered to enable better intra-operative neurological monitoring in the event of foetal-type posterior circle of Willis.

ASSESSMENT OF ANATOMICAL & FUNCTIONAL SUCCESS IN EXTERNAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY BY AIR BUBBLE TEST

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Vikas Tantuway
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Good Tool ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Reliability Indices ◽  
Air Bubble ◽  
Bubble Test ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Anatomical Success

Aim: To assess reliability indices of Air Bubble Test (ABT) for anatomical and functional success in external Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods: Prospective case series of nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent DCR. Functional success defined as Munk score 0 & 1 & anatomical success as free irrigation at followup.ABT performed by putting antibiotic drops into eye& asking patient to exhale while keeping nose & mouth closed. Formation of bubbles at punctum considered as positive test. Specificity, sensitivity, positive & negative predictive values calculated. Results: There were 103 DCR in 97 patients(23 male,74 female)with mean age 45.56 yr. Anatomical and functional success was 99.02% & 98.05%, respectively.ABT showed sensitivity 96.07%, specificity 100% for anatomical success after DCR. Sensitivity and specificity were 97.02% & 100% for functional success. Conclusion: As non-invasive procedure ABT is a good tool to assess success of DCR, though lacrimal syringing remains the gold standard. Keywords: Anatomical, Dacryocystorhinostomy & Air Bubble Test.

Uncomplicated adult inguinal hernia repair under local anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3212-3221
Author(s):  
Naniwadekar R G
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Early Ambulation ◽  
Inguinal Hernias ◽  
Hernia Inguinal ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Multiple researchers have given numerous guidelines in the clinical management of this disorder in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, after comprehensive works on the subject. As a result, a very wide variety of surgical procedures are now available to the surgeon to suit the requirement. There have been numerous advances in the management of inguinal hernia. Inguinal hernias can conveniently be repaired under all kinds of anaesthesia, namely general, spinal and local. Whereas the general anaesthesia requires the services of an experienced anaesthetist and new devices and spinal anaesthesia requires postoperative impairment while local anaesthesia is safe to prescribe, easy and efficient and does not cause postoperative complications. This work consisted of a study group of twenty-five adult patients of uncomplicated inguinal hernias, who after repair of hernias, which after repair of hernias were allowed early ambulation and had a short hospital, stay of one day post operatively. The second control group consisted of similar twenty-five patients who are subjected to conventional delayed ambulation and prolonged hospital stay. The results of repair in the two groups were compared; the available literature on the subject was reviewed. The implementation of ”shortstay surgery” not only relieves the waiting list in hospitals but also offers an economic boost and provides the patient with some social advantages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document